Ed Heron wrote:
...
I think so. I use rsync to synchronize samba shares and web sites between
servers so I've gotten used to using it for other things. It also looks
more like a copy, which might be easier to understand for those less
familiar. I was considering adding the tar option.
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 08:20:07AM -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Ed Heron wrote:
...
Thanks. Writing documentation is always a balancing act between not
putting enough detail in because it seems intuitive to the person who does
it every day and putting too much in with the effect of it
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 09:02:00AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
Often, I find the difference between BSD docs and Linux docs, the
difference between something written for the busy sysadmin and something
written for the hobbyist who has all day to go searching around for the
missing pieces.
From: Phil Schaffner, Wednesday, May 13, 2009 6:20 AM
It just works. I habitually use rsync for incremental updates across
directories or systems, but tar is often more robust for this type of
job, just because of things like needing to remember to use -H. Both
rsync and cpio will work if
Ed Heron wrote:
From: Phil Schaffner, Wednesday, May 13, 2009 6:20 AM
It just works. I habitually use rsync for incremental updates across
directories or systems, but tar is often more robust for this type of
job, just because of things like needing to remember to use -H. Both
rsync
From: Ralph Angenendt, Wednesday, May 13, 2009 9:42 AM
What happens when you set --xattrs in rsync, too? Their manual page does
not mention SELinux, though.
That's the X that I added to the rsync command. It does not successfully
copy SELinux attributes. That's why I had to set the relabel
From: Ed Heron, Tuesday, May 05, 2009 2:16 PM
My first draft of http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CentOS5ConvertToRAID is
complete.
Please, give it a once or thrice over and let me know what you think.
I didn't go into too much detail with some steps. If you think a
specific
step needs
haven't yet, but will do so later today. And if nobody complains, hey,
it probably is a good article :)
Ralph
Either that or I've hit a target nobody is interested in...
OK. It's a great article and nobody has any suggestions or problems...
I'm batting 1000... yeah, that.
Thanks.
Ed Heron wrote:
Has anybody had a chance to look at this?
Moving it up on my to-do list...
When cloning the root partition need to add H to the rsync flags to
preserve hard links. Don't think /boot uses hard links, but wouldn't
hurt to use it there also. An often-recommended alternative
From: Phil Schaffner, Tuesday, May 12, 2009 2:11 PM
Ed Heron wrote:
Has anybody had a chance to look at this?
Moving it up on my to-do list...
Thanks.
When cloning the root partition need to add H to the rsync flags to
preserve hard links. Don't think /boot uses hard links, but
On 05/12/2009 11:11 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Ed Heron wrote:
Has anybody had a chance to look at this?
Moving it up on my to-do list...
When cloning the root partition need to add H to the rsync flags to
preserve hard links. Don't think /boot uses hard links, but wouldn't
11 matches
Mail list logo
