On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 11:10 -0400, Chris Mauritz wrote:
> John wrote:
> > I just skimed through reading it. I would like to know if you can do
> > this install on CentOS 5.1 pulling all the packages from the centos yum
> > repos? Watch out that install of Python2.4.5. A user may have both
> > versi
On 09/04/2008, Daniel de Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Which is a bad idea anyway, since it defies the goal of an enterprise
> distribution. If there is a serious need for this (e.g. because a
> major application requires it), we should consider looking into
> providing Python packages that ca
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Alan Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 09/04/2008, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My second problem is with the source build of all those packages.
> > Building from source is something that we strongly advocate against in
> > all other suppo
On 09/04/2008, Ralph Angenendt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
wrote:
>
> My second problem is with the source build of all those packages.
> Building from source is something that we strongly advocate against in
> all other support venues (irc, mailing lists, probably also forums).
>
> And
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> alternative methods to get the desired program/software. There are,
> however, situations in which compiling from the source is the only
> way. In this case, I will try to make sure the procedure does not
> touch a
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Mauritz wrote:
> My second problem is with the source build of all those packages.
> Building from source is something that we strongly advocate against in
> all other support venues (irc, mailing lists, probably
John wrote:
I just skimed through reading it. I would like to know if you can do
this install on CentOS 5.1 pulling all the packages from the centos yum
repos? Watch out that install of Python2.4.5. A user may have both
versions installed at once. /usrbin/python2.4.4
and /usr/bin/python2.4.5 sud
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Mauritz wrote:
> > Building from source wasn't my preference either, but there aren't any up
> > to date packages available. Anyhow, I modified the document for my own use
> > in case I need to do it again. If y
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 08:32 -0400, Chris Mauritz wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > Chris Mauritz wrote:
> >> Daniel de Kok wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've modified/updated an existing HowTo (for RHEL) I found on the net
> det
Chris Mauritz wrote:
> Building from source wasn't my preference either, but there aren't any up
> to date packages available. Anyhow, I modified the document for my own use
> in case I need to do it again. If you'd like to exclude it for the
> "compiled from source" reason alone, that's fine
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Chris Mauritz wrote:
Daniel de Kok wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've modified/updated an existing HowTo (for RHEL) I found on the net
detailing how to install the following on a "virgin" CentOS 5.1 install:
Can the ori
Chris Mauritz wrote:
> Daniel de Kok wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I've modified/updated an existing HowTo (for RHEL) I found on the net
>>> detailing how to install the following on a "virgin" CentOS 5.1 install:
>>
>> Can the original HOWT
Daniel de Kok wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've modified/updated an existing HowTo (for RHEL) I found on the net
detailing how to install the following on a "virgin" CentOS 5.1 install:
Can the original HOWTO can be redistributed, preferably
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Chris Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've modified/updated an existing HowTo (for RHEL) I found on the net
> detailing how to install the following on a "virgin" CentOS 5.1 install:
Can the original HOWTO can be redistributed, preferably under the
Creative Co
Chris Mauritz wrote:
> I've modified/updated an existing HowTo (for RHEL) I found on the net
> detailing how to install the following on a "virgin" CentOS 5.1 install:
>
> Python 2.4.5
> Python Imaging Library 1.1.6
> Zope 2.10.5
> Plone 3.0.6 Content Management System
>
> Do I just email it to th
15 matches
Mail list logo
