From: "Manuel Wolfshant", Thursday, September 03, 2009 5:39 PM
> I would provide a few more details under the "Virtual Host files can be
> placed in the configuration directory directly or by link." category
> (i.e. about the separate folder with configs and symlinks to
> conf.d/vhost.d).
Do yo
On 09/04/2009 12:12 AM, Ed Heron wrote:
> From: "Filipe Brandenburger", Thursday, September 03, 2009 1:27 PM
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 15:13, Ed Heron wrote:
>>
[1] I am not sure what will happen after a full relabeling of the
system, since the new directory does not
From: "Filipe Brandenburger", Thursday, September 03, 2009 1:27 PM
>Hi,
>
>On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 15:13, Ed Heron wrote:
>>> [1] I am not sure what will happen after a full relabeling of the
>>> system, since the new directory does not exist in the selinux database
>>> (I mean /etc/selinux/targete
From: "Filipe Brandenburger", Thursday, September 03, 2009 12:56 PM
> ...
>Your Wiki page reads "The issue with [using conf.d/] is that, since
>the files in conf.d/ are included with the module configuration files,
>the virtual host definitions would come before other options that
>could effect th
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 15:13, Ed Heron wrote:
>> [1] I am not sure what will happen after a full relabeling of the
>> system, since the new directory does not exist in the selinux database
>> (I mean /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts, part of
>> selinux-policy)
>
> I added a
- Original Message -
From: "Filipe Brandenburger"
To: "Mail list for wiki articles"
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] doc?: TipsAndTricks/ApacheVHostDir
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 14:39, Manuel Wolfshant
wrote:
> On 09/03/
From: "Manuel Wolfshant", Thursday, September 03, 2009 12:39 PM
> On 09/03/2009 07:02 PM, Ed Heron wrote:
>> Are there any other opinions? Questions?
>>
>> Is my suggestion to add ./vhost.d/ to the Apache configuration as a
>> user
>> installable option not acceptable?
>From a technical
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 14:39, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> On 09/03/2009 07:02 PM, Ed Heron wrote:
>> Is my suggestion to add ./vhost.d/ to the Apache configuration as a user
>> installable option not acceptable?
> I still think that it simply duplicates the existing functionality of
> the conf
On 09/03/2009 07:02 PM, Ed Heron wrote:
> Are there any other opinions? Questions?
>
> Is my suggestion to add ./vhost.d/ to the Apache configuration as a user
> installable option not acceptable?
From a technical point of view, your suggestion seems 100% correct,
including the selinux c
Are there any other opinions? Questions?
Is my suggestion to add ./vhost.d/ to the Apache configuration as a user
installable option not acceptable?
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cento
10 matches
Mail list logo
