Re: [CentOS-docs] SELinux, Amavis, Clamav
On 28.10.2012 09:52, Harald Oehlmann wrote: Am 27.10.2012 23:33, schrieb Ralph Angenendt: 1) I would put the test chapter after the SELinux chapter Okay. 2) The first sentence in 5.1 suggestes (for me), that the settings for CentOS 5 are not required for CentOS 6. I don't think this is the case. Proposed change: Current phrase: For CentOS 6 a slightly different approach is needed. New phrase: For CentOS 6, additional steps are required. Changed that. 3) Are you shure, this is CentOS 6 specific ? How do you know ? I tested this on CentOS 5 way back when that content was written. :) 4) I personally would add some explanation in 5.1, what this is for. The reason for explanation is, that this scheme may be used for eventual other virus scanners in an analoguous way. Added that, too. 5) I am not shure, if the Harald Oehlmann and the link to the post is very helpful... I just wanted to give credit, where credit is due :) Plus: Your mail has some reasoning as to why that was added, which I don't know if that should belong on that page. I can take that out, if you want. Regards, Ralph ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] install option on wiki homepage
On 03.11.2012 20:40, Karanbir Singh wrote: hi, The install option on the wiki homepage looks a bit odd, is it really meant to point at the generic docs landing page for CentOS-5 ? Especially as I don't think that the sentence surrounding it is true, I don't see anything hindering us (well, except lack of time, maybe) to do exactly that: Create CentOS branded versions of those docs. Ralph ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] SELinux, Amavis, Clamav
All ok, thank you, Harald Am 08.11.2012 23:41, schrieb Ralph Angenendt: On 28.10.2012 09:52, Harald Oehlmann wrote: Am 27.10.2012 23:33, schrieb Ralph Angenendt: 1) I would put the test chapter after the SELinux chapter Okay. 2) The first sentence in 5.1 suggestes (for me), that the settings for CentOS 5 are not required for CentOS 6. I don't think this is the case. Proposed change: Current phrase: For CentOS 6 a slightly different approach is needed. New phrase: For CentOS 6, additional steps are required. Changed that. 3) Are you shure, this is CentOS 6 specific ? How do you know ? I tested this on CentOS 5 way back when that content was written. :) 4) I personally would add some explanation in 5.1, what this is for. The reason for explanation is, that this scheme may be used for eventual other virus scanners in an analoguous way. Added that, too. 5) I am not shure, if the Harald Oehlmann and the link to the post is very helpful... I just wanted to give credit, where credit is due :) Plus: Your mail has some reasoning as to why that was added, which I don't know if that should belong on that page. I can take that out, if you want. Regards, Ralph ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs -- ELMICRON Dr. Harald Oehlmann GmbH Koesener Str. 85 D - 06618 Naumburg Phone: +49 (0)3445 78112 0 Fax: +49 (0)3445 78112 19 www.Elmicron.de German legal references: Geschaeftsfuehrer: Dr. Harald Oehlmann, Jens Oehlmann UST Nr. / VAT ID No.: DE206105272 HRB 212803 Stendal ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
