On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 14:03 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
I think that this page needs a TOC:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Nagios
I still think that this wiki is a wiki.
And it is still a Wiki that presents Immutable Page on the Actions
bar to most viewers and
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 11:56 +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Just an idea to throw out there...
It seems that moin is capable of adding forms and mostly sane actions to
the forms. Would that be one route that we might be able to take w.r.t
lowering the bar to entry for contributors into
Max Hetrick wrote:
John wrote:
My opinion I don't find it really an off topic consideration to think
about. I even use it on my laptop. I have clients that use it strictly
for desktop use only and not as a server because they can not afford to
buy Win XP or Vista. Introduce them to K3B,
Marcus Moeller wrote:
Dear Dag,
This is to notify that I have put a screenshot on the FrontPage. It is not
an exciting screenshot, just a simple default desktop with the browser
opened and pointed to the wiki itself.
hmm, is it possible to at least take the screenshot as a *non* root user ?
rolandsun sun wrote:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Dell/Inspiron-1537
wiki name :rolandsun
Presumably you want someone to create the page and give you edit permission?
Per http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute Create a login with a username in
the format FirstnameLastname. An
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
RedShift wrote:
The $rpm is explained in the text, I will replace it with a correct
command in the wiki version. (You could easily assign $rpm to be rpm
--target /target -i in your shell)
Ah, I mistook that for a prompt, I just did a speedparse on the
document. =:)
Created a new HowTo on running your own local mirror:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CreateLocalMirror
Comments and (constructive :-) criticism are invited.
Phil
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 14:24 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
...
It is also a one-liner. For example:
lftp -e 'open http://some.site/centos/ mirror -c --delete 5.3 exit'
will mirror the whole 5.3 under the remote centos/ directory.
Well Duhhh... as my daughter would say. :-)
My work blocks
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 21:31 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
...
I've been rather busy of late so haven't been following the full details
of this discussion (just briefly reading), but the moment you're ready
for us to jump in with some testing, please give us a loud shout and
we'll be there :)
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 17:09 -0400, JohnS wrote:
I would just
mirror base extras updates and addons and not the dvds
I agree - that's why I used:
--exclude isos
and included advice about customizing.
Phil
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 21:35 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
you could potentially replace most of that article with a 2 line script
running reposync. Since we ship it, might be worth talking about it.
Well, hope there is some value to the content about the client side.
Admittedly there are many
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 21:43 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 21:35 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
you could potentially replace most of that article with a 2 line script
running reposync. Since we ship it, might be worth talking about it.
Well, hope there is some value
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 10:36 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
[r...@koala ~]# yum search reposync
Ughhh! Why didn't I think of that? man reposync or reposync --help
would also have demonstrated more cluefullness on my part. Oh well,
should have just gone to bed earlier. :-)
Will check it out and
Mr dave fernandes wrote:
Hello,
My name is Dave Fernandes I'm interested in contributing an article
as a function of feedback I've received on setting up samba on CentOS.
Username is davecgs. The article is really about how to deal with the
iptables and selinux without disabling
A question on authorship and attribution policy for the Wiki. I
originally credited Alan Bartlett for the page content on
HowTos/ConfigureNewVideoCard, but he was not comfortable with that and
the reference got removed in the edit process. I generally do not
include my name on Wiki pages I
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 17:11 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
...
Problem is ... people without edit rights do not see the link.
OOPS - Forgot that.
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Mats Karlsson wrote:
So could we have two alternative text to cover the topic, who can edit
an article?
Currently maintained by: name
Can only be edited by maintainer.
Currently maintained by: CentOS-docs mailing list
Can be edited by anyone on the mailinglist.
s/Can/Should/ at least as
Ed Heron wrote:
I'd seen references to hijacking a thread but hadn't realized what that
meant. I've looked at my sent mail headers and found a References: header
item. Hadn't seen that before. Is that what the list uses to tie threads
together? I was naively thinking it was the subject
JohnS wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 13:29 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Seems obvious to me after all this (and previous) discussion that some
more guidance on the Contribute page would help to clarify what is and
is not considered acceptable. Such a statement could be arrived at
either
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 12:58 +0200, Marcus Moeller wrote:
In my opinion a policy like this described somewhere is a mistake. I
prefer we have macro(s) for this. And if the macro is missing, the wiki
provides a default.
I differentiate between a policy that implies strict enforcement, and
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 11:37 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Mats Karlsson wrote:
So could we have two alternative text to cover the topic, who can edit
an article?
Currently maintained by: name
Can only be edited by maintainer.
Not really possible, as everyone in EditGroup is allowed
Flash and Java plugin instructions for 64-bit Firefox.
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/PluginsFor64BitFirefox
Comments are solicited.
Phil
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 18:10 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:45:31PM -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Flash and Java plugin instructions for 64-bit Firefox.
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/PluginsFor64BitFirefox
Comments are solicited.
What's that created
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 12:25 -0700, Sean Gilligan wrote:
...
I noticed this wiki page
(http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CreateLocalMirror) was recently added.
I believe using Cobbler is a valid alternative approach for this,
right?
Please feel free to add a Cobbler summary and/or pointers to
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 21:48 +0200, Marcus Moeller wrote:
Dear Phil,
...
Sorry Phil. I personally cannot accept this HowTo at current state.
That's why I'm asking for feedback! :-)
There is also some cute documentation available in the Deployment
Guide.
Yes - pointed to that in the
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 17:54 -0400, JohnS wrote:
You should not use dd on any active disk raid or not.
That's not what the procedure recommends, at least for the target disk,
and /boot ought to be relatively safe for the source, but it will become
a moot point anyway as that part will disappear
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 18:45 -0400, JohnS wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 14:53 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SoftwareRAIDonCentOS5
---\
After installing a new kernel, repeat Section Three.
That has got to be BS. There has to be a better way and easier way. I
just
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 18:52 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
I think that's what Phil meant also.
Yes - another case of that's what I thought I said, but apparently with
insufficient clarity. This list should qualify as a [technical]
writer's workshop. :-)
Phil
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 10:22 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Phil Schaffner wrote:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SoftwareRAIDonCentOS5
Comments and corrections please.
I dont understand what this line means:
This page created and maintained by PhilSchaffner. Other Wiki
contributors
I have attempted to address all comments:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SoftwareRAIDonCentOS5
Give me your best shot! :-D
Phil
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Ned Slider wrote:...
/remembering my disclaimer/ I'm not a raid/grub expert...
You are too modest. :-) I should put in that disclaimer too!
Presumably Section two is required because grub is installed to the mbr
of /dev/sda so /dev/sdb isn't bootable in the event /dev/sda should fail?
Ned Slider wrote:
...
... I guess even the first part above is unnecessary if grub has already
been correctly installed to the mbr of /dev/sda during installation.
Yes, but it won't hurt and makes the method robust for recovering from a
failed disk.
IMHO I don't think there's a need for
Ed Heron wrote:
From: Ed Heron, Tuesday, April 28, 2009 11:09 AM
Does documentation exist describing how to convert a simple, single disk
non-RAID CentOS 5 system to software RAID1 using the CentOS install CD/DVD
as a rescue disk?
(Assuming not) Is there a need for such?
(Assuming
Ed Heron wrote:
From: Phil Schaffner, Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:31 AM
Having a RAID section in the HowTos page makes sense to me, rather than
cluttering up Misc. Does not require /RAID/ in the directory structure.
How about HowTos/CentOS5ConvertToRAID for a more Wiki-like name
Karanbir Singh wrote:
While articles are being worked on, can we have a policy that says
something like 'must contain a banner on the top indicating its a draft
article'
I see that has been added to the Guidelines.
I put such a notice in my latest draft effort. Is there a way to
Ned Slider wrote:
...
I can't think of a good argument for not having /boot on the raid1.
Presumably performance isn't an issue as the contents of /boot gets read
once at system boot (other than maybe fast booting performance, but
that's not really going to be an issue for a server running
Phil Schaffner wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
...
Perhaps what we need is a complete section in the howto's page that
talks about storage devices and management of these ( need better phrase ).
That sounds like a good idea, and more general than the
recently-suggested RAID section. How
R P Herrold wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
There's always going to be an argument about whether to put /boot and swap
on RAID. It's all about performance most of the time being slightly better
versus stability in the event of device failure.
I can't think of a good
Ed Heron wrote:
Please, how would I create a colored area with fixed space text to emulate
computer response?
Ralph and Akemi have already given good (polite!) answers, but one way
to get going on Wiki editing is to find a page that is an example of the
way you want yours to look and under
Sean Gilligan wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
...
Maybe someone with a bit better java background than I have would like to
chime in?
Ned-style disclaimer, I am not a Java expert; OTOH, I have
built/rebuilt-from-SRPM a lot of Java packages over the years using the
HowTo or variations
Lalit Dhiri wrote:
Good afternoon,
I'd like to write a Wiki article for the Dell XPS M1530 laptop which
will include additional mods eg installation of Nvidia driver, WiFi
firmware, laptop hard disk Load Cycle control etc. Can someone get me
started?
Username: LalitDhiri
Thanks
Hay,
Lalit Dhiri wrote:
Good morning,
Would anyone with CentOS Wiki experience consider giving feedback on
the state of my draft article at?
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Dell/XPS_M1530
I will be adding info ref Nvidia graphics card driver, hard drive
Load Cycle and hope to have the
Lalit Dhiri wrote:
...
I could not get the Ethernet to work when I first installed 5.2 on
the XPS M1530 so I chose to use the same route and made use of WiFi.
I will try Ethernet with out making changes with 5.3 to see if things
get going if not this is probably still the easiest route imho.
Ed Heron wrote:
Has anybody had a chance to look at this?
Moving it up on my to-do list...
When cloning the root partition need to add H to the rsync flags to
preserve hard links. Don't think /boot uses hard links, but wouldn't
hurt to use it there also. An often-recommended alternative
Vladislav Rastrusny wrote:
Created a draft. Any comments?
Please don't top-post. Would also be good to do a new post with a
descriptive title like:
Subject: Draft TipsAndTricks/InstallWebminRepo page
That would better capture attention than one buried in a long thread.
Will have a look at
Ed Heron wrote:
...
I think so. I use rsync to synchronize samba shares and web sites between
servers so I've gotten used to using it for other things. It also looks
more like a copy, which might be easier to understand for those less
familiar. I was considering adding the tar option.
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Vladislav Rastrusny wrote:
...
And also I would like to contribute automated RPM forge repository
installation script:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=20222forum=38post_id=76525#forumpost76525
after it will be checked by forum users and found
Apropos http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/InstallWebminRepo
Suggested changes (mostly nit-picky :-) ...
Change:
Webmin is a web-based interface ...
to:
[http://www.webmin.com/index.html WebMin] is a web-based interface
Scott Robbins wrote:
...
Again, it was a generalization--there are plenty of excellent Linux man
pages and obscure BSD man pages.
... and virtually all of them are better than MS pages that all too
frequently end up by advising the admin looking for answers: Ask your
administrator. :-P
Phil
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Phil Schaffner wrote:
Apropos http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/InstallWebminRepo
Suggested changes (mostly nit-picky :-) ...
Just brief look at the page, can do with some grammar checks I think
Dag Wieers wrote:
...
I don't see anything compelling on the CentOS website frontpage that is
worth going to from the Wiki.
How about the links to the mirror network, IRC Chat, Mailing Lists,
Forums, FAQ, and Commercial support all within 2 lines; Descriptions of
all the major releases with
Patrice Guay wrote:
I created both English and French release notes pages for the upcoming
CentOS LiveCD
5.3:
Patrice,
Not essential, but it would be nice to add a note about what you had to
cut out from the 5.2 package set to make things fit (emacs, scribus, and
k3b IIRC) and the ease of
Alan Bartlett wrote:
...
Pedantically and ignoring the RAID aspect, just looking at the
equations scientifically, I would say that only the first one is wrong
as (64K / 4K) = 16, not 16K. It should be expressed as (64 / 4)K =
16K.
The other two lines do read correctly but, in the spirit of
Gerald and P.J.,
I just finished setting up VNC services following
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/VNC-Server
and have a few comments.
2.3. Edit the server configuration
The last line should be corrected from
VNCSERVERARGS[1]=-geometry 800x600
to
VNCSERVERARGS[3]=-geometry 800x600
2.4.
JohnS wrote:
...
Hmm I think I have a script somewhere that will do that. Pretty nice.
Would be a good addition if you would care to contribute.
What's the reason for fat16? Why not ext2,3? Just curious.
None that I know of. Just a choice made by the guy on the CentOS Users
ML - John Doe -
Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 06/19/2009 11:54 AM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
...
right, you can just copy the isos to the usb key, and run a normal HDD
install process.
True, and would be glad to note that, but having it all on the USB key
is what caught my attention when I saw the original post.
hans...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm currently testing a process very similar to that found here:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey
And would like to update that doc with my observations once confirmed.
Would be glad to work with you on the USB install procedure[s]. Sounds
like
hans...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Thanks for the offer Phil. Sorry I'm a noob to the process, specifically
how do you suggest we work together on this documentation? Are you
proposing we email back and forth, and if so, do you mean here within
the list or privately?
If the CentOS wiki works
JohnS wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 09:48 +0700, hans...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Phil Schaffner philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov
Do you like the idea of suggesting the LiveCD image rather than the
net install? Lots of advantages and no disadvantages that I can think
of. . .
---
hans
Phil Schaffner wrote:
JohnS wrote:
...
Sorry I neglected to remove the *SPAM* tag. Something about your post
made our filters unhappy. Tried editing this Subject: as an experiment.
Phil
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http
Eric Schewe wrote:
Thanks! I believe I've completed my page. Feel free to let me know
what I've done wrong :)
On the repo config - I'd suggest creating a separate CentOS-Testing.repo
rather than adding to the existing CentOS-Base.repo, and no need to
specify the editor (vim) and risk getting
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Phil Schaffner wrote:
...
Thanks, please also consider changing the title. Nothing about it tells
you that the instructions are for first time install only. Perhaps
adding instructions for switching to console during install time will
reinforce that fact
Brian Mathis wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Phil
Schaffnerphilip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov wrote:
... but left /dev/sda and /dev/sdb in
place as changing to /dev/sdX|Y looked very awkward to me.
...
Phil
That's exactly the point of using something like X/Y. It stands out
and looks
lostson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 23:39 -0400, JohnS wrote:
...
[1] http://wiki.centos.org/HardwareList/Nvidia_Graphics
JohnStanley
I was reading yours over today and yes they are very similar, hopefully
i can get edit permissions soon and we can get it all squared away.
Might want to
Ned Slider wrote on 09/14/2009 01:23 PM:
...
Do we need to decide what the official (or preferred) CentOS Way is for
this? Or do we just present all the options without prejudice?
There are (to my knowledge) the Nvidia binary installer, dkms driver
from rpmforge, kmdl package from ATrpms,
Ned Slider wrote on 09/16/2009 06:12 AM:
...
That tends to change as the drivers move forward over time, older cards
become legacy and are no longer supported by the latest driver.
For a list of cards supported by the latest driver, the user is better
off referring to nvidia's
lostson wrote on 09/16/2009 08:23 AM:
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 07:50 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
...
In the doc we have been toying with the finding the correct driver is
in there.
Yes, I see it in the draft - just suggesting ideas to beef it up.
Phil
P.S. [soapbox]Trimming quotes
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 16:25 -0700, Steve Bonds wrote:
As requested on http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute, here is my info:
# your FirstnameLastname username [SteveBonds]
# the proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s) [Personal Page]
# the proposed location of your Wiki contribution(s)
Ralph Angenendt wrote on 10/05/2009 04:40 AM:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Dag Wieers d...@wieers.com wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Could it be that entry to collaborate is not low enough to make it work ? If
you have too many rules, people might be afraid/unable to make
Artem Zhirkow wrote on 10/09/2009 10:53 AM:
Hello,
Why do you includes bluez-utils in each release? I pretty sure what centos is
server distro, not desktop-oriented. If some hacker will use centos on his
desktop or laptop he will install bluez from repository without any problem.
That's a
On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 23:19 +0100, Lucian @ lastdot.org wrote:
...
Oh, and as the live CD will also be released close to the distribution
itself, the 5.4 live CD pages are also already there.
...
Will it support a persistent install on a flash drive?
No, not yet. Check the centos-devel list
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 09:47 -0700, Artem Zhirkow wrote:
Is this kind of advertisment? Dropbox isnt centos or opensource
project, so why did we received it?
Looks like spam to me.
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote on 10/14/2009 09:51 PM:
Hey
And it is this time of the month again when we are about to release a
new Newsletter (#0906).
Please could people start checking spelling and contribute their parts.
The deadline is the 19th of Oct as we don't want to release on a
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 00:29 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Am 16.10.09 22:48, schrieb Phil Schaffner:
Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote on 10/14/2009 09:51 PM:
If someone is interested in helping please contact me.
Seems to be too well protected.
I guess that's why ... see above :)
Well
Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote on 10/19/2009 04:00 PM:
Hey
Unfortunately I have to delay the Newsletter for a day as I still have
no Interview. Could I also remind people to proof read it.
Sorry about this.
Cheers Didi
Added some media links. Didn't see anything to recommend changing on
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote on 01/21/2010 06:26 AM:
Phil Schaffner ha scritto:
2. The command to create /etc/mdadm.conf will result in an extra line
spares=1 while the array is still syncing. Adding | head -1 to
the command to create it fixes the problem.
May I suggest to add | grep -v
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 09:24 +0300, Lev Shamardin wrote:
Some later thoughts go below.
On 01/21/2010 01:50 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
1. The user should be instructed to start rescue mode with networking in
order to be able to retrieve the patch for mkinitrd.
The mkinitrd instructions
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 08:57 +0300, Lev Shamardin wrote:
On 01/21/2010 01:50 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
4. It is not necessary to change LABEL=... to /dev/md_d0... in
/etc/fstab and /boot/grub/grub.conf.
Have you tested this? I'm not quite sure, but it seems to me that this did not
work
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 18:37 -0600, donavan nelson wrote:
I suspect if you tried with 6G you would significantly less than 5.1G
used post install.
Agreed, as previous tests showed. Doesn't help much with estimating the
minimum requirement if the OS won't install, and a practical system
needs
R P Herrold wrote on 03/03/2010 04:23 PM:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Added an entry to http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General :
23. How do I provide appropriate information about my system when asking
questions?
Comments, corrections, and other (constructive :-) ) criticisms
Ned Slider wrote on 03/04/2010 11:21 AM:
...
Which is exactly the point of bringing it to this list for discussion,
so what started life as a (suggestion for a) tool to assist forum
community members/helpers may also be considered by helpers in other
community support channels (i.e, IRC and
Marcus Moeller wrote on 04/30/2010 02:45 AM:
Dear Phil.
Thanks for the feedback. Will have a look when I get time, which may not be
soon with 5.5 QA heating up. I was actually thinking about depreciating
that procedure and recommending UNetbootin which is a lot simpler to use. I
created
Just updated the subject page
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General/RebuildReleaseProcess
based on Karanbir's comment on centos-devel:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2010-May/005545.html
Is there better material available to replace the erroneous content, or
should the page be
Karanbir Singh wrote on 05/21/2010 12:54 PM:
Hi,
On 05/21/2010 05:30 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
OK, thanks - but begs the question - What is the current process?
I published this a while back :
http://www.karan.org/stuff/c5-release-plan.jpeg ; which if you look at -
reflects the same
Proposed new page for comment:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/InstallFromGRUB
Phil
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Manuel Wolfshant wrote on 05/27/2010 08:22 AM:
...
My example is adequate (and used) for remote upgrades (hence the
upgradeany from the kernel line) rather than fresh installs.
I don't doubt that it works, but still wonder if the root= is a NOP.
___
Ed Heron wrote on 05/27/2010 04:27 PM:
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:30 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Proposed new page for comment:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/InstallFromGRUB
Phil
I suggest adding links to some supporting documentation. For example,
you could add a prerequisites
Ned Slider wrote on 07/29/2010 04:24 PM:
...
I agree 100%
IMHO discussion should best take place on this docs discussion mailing
list, not within the docs themselves.
Let me add my 100% agreement. Queries and comments within the Wiki
articles will only confuse and frustrate Wiki readers.
R P Herrold wrote on 07/29/2010 06:32 PM:
Time to get rid of some wiki cruft
An excellent and constructive idea.
Phil
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Santanu Das wrote on 08/19/2010 08:19 AM:
that's fine; as you think it's better for the community.
OK - Pending other comments, we need to await Ralph to grant access.
Phil
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
Ralph Angenendt wrote on 08/20/2010 05:10 PM:
Am 19.08.10 16:11, schrieb Phil Schaffner:
Santanu Das wrote on 08/19/2010 08:19 AM:
that's fine; as you think it's better for the community.
OK - Pending other comments, we need to await Ralph to grant access.
Hmmm. Hmmm. Shouldn't that go
On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 07:07 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
(hoping this is the right way to submit updates for wiki pages.)
Made your recommended changes.
Thanks,
Phil
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
Robert P. J. Day wrote on 10/07/2010 07:51 AM:
...
ok, since i don't have edit access to the wiki, do i simply post
proposed changes to this list in terms of precisely what text should
be replaced by newer text?
Perhaps it is time to remedy that situation. Have you created a
WikiName
Robert P. J. Day wrote on 10/07/2010 05:25 PM:
BTW, i do have a wiki username: RobDay. i simply don't have edit
rights.
Perhaps Ralph will now be willing to remedy that.
Phil
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
Although CentOS 3 EOL was announced by Tru on Nov 3, 2010 it is still
listed on the home page with no indication of the EOL status. This has
been the source of some confusion already.
Phil
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
Ralph Angenendt wrote on 01/15/2011 03:40 PM:
...
Maybe a word on adding non loaded modules would be fine at this point :)
Please do feel free to provide that. I neglected to add my usual
invitation for others to edit the page, but consider it, in the
traditional Wiki spirit, as a blanket
Ralph Angenendt wrote on 01/15/2011 03:39 PM:
...
To me the article looks good, if you can incorporate it into the current
wiki article (and not just replace that).
I beg to differ. The current Wiki article contains a lot of confusing
and obsolete information, and in trying to cover a
Manuel Wolfshant wrote on 01/15/2011 07:59 PM:
I took advantage of you invitation to complete/correct the page and
fixed a minor typo + added a reference to the xenblk module
Thanks. Instructions on adding other modules would be good to add too,
when someone gets a Round Tuit.
Phil
Jasper Siepkes wrote on 01/16/2011 07:30 AM:
...
If anyone is interested I could put up a wiki page outlining the steps
to create RPM's with JPackage ?
Very much so, particularly your spec mods and details on your
alternatives configuration, which seems to cover more bases than I have
done in
Per Alan's suggestion:
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/EmulateFixedAddressByDHCP
Comments please.
Phil
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
