Max Hetrick wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Can the article not be made more Arch agnostic ?
Sure, why not if that's something the EditGroup decides on. Why couldn't
we just put x86 and x86_64 is the titles?
no, thats a really bad idea - if someone is looking for info on a
specific
Karanbir Singh wrote:
Btw, where should I look for editorial notes ? I just looked and failed
at finding anything.
If you tell me what you mean by that I might help you looking.
Although that might be the Orval from last night still doing the
rounds in my head.
Augustiner Beer does the
S.Tindall wrote:
1) Add the wiki reference, which contains clarification of many points
not addressed sufficiently in the documentation.
http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net/
Done.
2) Also, a bug report contains corrective measures for the 64-bit
installation.
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 13:55 -0500, Max Hetrick wrote:
S.Tindall wrote:
5) A section addressing backing up Macs would be very helpful (to me).
The official documentation is very lacking in that area.
Do you have edit rights on the wiki? If so, feel free to add to or edit.
Nope. Maybe
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Filipe Brandenburger
filbran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
By the way, I was planning on giving feedback on my experiences with
the BackupPC RPM in CentOS for a long time, but I didn't know where to
do it. I'm sorry I ended up hijacking this thread with this, since
Max,
Wow. Thanks for the BackupPC guide. I've looked at BackupPC a few times over
the last couple of years but haven't gotten around to actually trying to deploy
it yet because something always got bumped up in front of as being a more
important task... mainly because the modest
S.Tindall wrote:
Nope. Maybe someday.
So you're asking me to apply something to a guide which you want, but
yet to you don't want to offer time to add to the document yourself?
My view of a HowTo's purpose is to make the described service useful to
a wide audience. You don't interact with
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 15:18 -0500, Max Hetrick wrote:
S.Tindall wrote:
That being said, I'm personally done discussing this. You don't seem to
be very appreciative to others volunteering any kind of time to the Wiki.
Yes, I agree. Our discussion is concluded.
Steve
Akemi Yagi wrote:
Of course, missing l is important (in fairy). :-D
We have fairies now too on the wiki? Cool! :-D
Max
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
William L. Maltby wrote:
I read the thread the same as you. Maybe Max was stressed and misread
the intent of Steve.
You are correct William, I did misread what Steve was trying to say, and
I didn't mean to sound harsh. I also explained in my reply back to Akemi
why I felt Windows was
10 matches
Mail list logo
