Hi,
I have one KVM instance (centos 5) that keeps crashing and i see the message
log with the following:
Oct 14 16:24:48 localhost kernel: psmouse.c: Explorer Mouse at
isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization, throwing 1 bytes away.
Oct 14 16:24:49 localhost kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0
hi guys,
Just wondering if anyone has done any performance testing between kvm
and xen on CentOS-5 ( using centos as host and vm in every case ) ?
Regards,
--
Karanbir Singh
London, UK | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG
I don't have any benchmarks per se just my recent testing of them
I think xen is still on top in terms of performance and featuresnow
having said that my experience in the past with kvm and my latest testing
with 5.5 and KVM I can say that KVM has made great strides with the virtio
On 10/14/2010 07:48 AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
I think xen is still on top in terms of performance and featuresnow
that is indeed what it 'feels' like, but I'm quite keen on putting some
numbers on that.
having said that my experience in the past with kvm and my latest
testing with 5.5 and
When you get the numbers please share, as I for one would be very
interestedI have read some on the web but nothing as of late.I just
don't have the time right now to go benchmark anything
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.orgwrote:
On 10/14/2010 07:48
Hi Karanbir,
On 14 October 2010 19:59, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 10/14/2010 07:48 AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
I think xen is still on top in terms of performance and featuresnow
that is indeed what it 'feels' like, but I'm quite keen on putting some
numbers on that.
I
On Oct 14, 2010, at 1:38 AM, Poh Yong Hwang wrote:
Hi,
I have one KVM instance (centos 5) that keeps crashing and i see the message
log with the following:
Oct 14 16:24:48 localhost kernel: psmouse.c: Explorer Mouse at
isa0060/serio1/input0 lost synchronization, throwing 1 bytes away.
