with keys etc.
>
> If there is a better way to do this then happy to discuss.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew.
> ___
> CentOS-virt mailing list
> CentOS-virt@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
>
--
K
w if that works for
the c4.8large ?
I've asked, a few times, for the CentOS Linux images in AMP to be
enabled for all instance types where the image will work. So if its not
being enabled, there is a chance the image isnt suitable, and we should
find out why.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http:
ll the next CentOS 7 AMI start using NetworkManager instead of
> the traditional ifcfg-* scripts?
would making these changes not break the existing automation that folks
might have in place ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.
Regards
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
ok through the bits and see where we are and get this process
started up. We'd need to get some basic testing done, and then we can
promote it a bit.
is the docker-1.10 stack completely in-place replacement/upgrade from
the existing distro hosted docker ( 1.8.2 ? )
regards
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-2
irections :) However, you
>> ask a reasonable question.
>>
>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>>
>>> On 27/02/16 01:41, Scot P. Floess wrote:
>>> > > From George's original email, I had to:
>>> > >* Instal
stion is - one cant run xen
without the kernel, so why not have the xen package require the xen
kernel as a prereq ?
regards,
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
_
hi,
I just noticed that yum install xen does not pull in the xen kernel on
c7, is this by design ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-virt mailing
>> /usr/lib64/xen/boot/pv-grub-x86_64.gz
>
> FYI I've got a new version that provides symbolic links for backwards
> compatibility which should have hit buildlogs (aka
> centos-virt-xen-testing) two hours ago, but hasn't for some reason...
can you check and let me know - I've lo
now, pointing to the latest xen-XX in each of the centos
repos )
Regards
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
giving permissions to Rafael to build and tag
> packages in ovirt / qemu tree?
best thing to do for new folks is to come to the SIG meeting, and work
through the process that way - also introduce yourself to the other
folks in the SIG, so they have an idea on what you are looking to do and
how th
adoption.
Regards,
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
I'm happy to
> help build an AMI for public use following the instructions if someone
> can point me in the right direction.
>
> Thanks for your help,
let me bring this up with the amp folks and see what they say, i bet the
govcloud needs a lot more paperwork etc to get setup from our side. bu
? Or at least enough of them to replicate something similar?
Thanks,
Jason
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org
mailto:mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 04/14/2015 12:48 PM, Jason Antman wrote:
Hello,
I'm new to this list, but I noticed
environment that are as close as possible to
the official CentOS7 AMIs. I could attempt to reverse-engineer them and
do you need to do much more than qemu-img convert -O vmdk
centos-genericcloud.qcow2 ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http
note that we want git branch, koji builds, release tags and test
project, sign request queue and release process to map to a single
'TAG', will this still work ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
On 13/02/15 19:18, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:15:39PM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
hi guys,
docker 1.5 is now in virt7-testing repos, please test and feedback so we
can move to release..
thanks lokesh!
- KB
Sure thing KB. Also, docker-registry will be ready
, the gluster
rpms will move to mirror.centos.org - and the centos-release-gluster
will move to Extras ( and will then be available for every/all centos
installs on c6/c7 ).
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
On 27/01/15 14:46, Lars Kurth wrote:
Hi all,
at today's call we decided to make the meetings going forward IRC only. If I
don't get any objections by next Tue, I will update invites and wiki
Regards
sounds good,
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com
you open a bugreport for this at bugs.centos.org against the cloud
images please ? in the mean time, I will circle back with AWS folks and
let you know what is going on.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
needs to deal with certain amount of driver
updates to keep the most common hardware working..
are we willing to / able to - patch this into the kernel ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
back,
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
likely enforce that.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
you want to
discuss
Who is planning to join? Raise your hand in the next hour
If I don't get items/participants, I suggest we cancel today's call
I am in the USA this week, can sit in on irc but likely unable to
participate much.
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http
heartbleed come around,
there is a single place we need to update.
- KB
[1]: http://cloud.centos.org/centos/6/devel/
[2] might need to pull in all of libguestfs to make the changes, which
in turn has its own challenges if run inside a virtualised environ.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http
the challenges might be to
enable this support, and then what the options are to deliver this support ?
If we can get the stuff staged up, we can work it during the Distro QA
stages and target ( potentially ) a in-sync release for Xen support when
CentOS7 goes GA
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207
thats
happened as yet. lets workout details in the meeting today
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http
acess should be, imho, tied to git commit access (
since it also gives people the acl to close or delete bug reports ).
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
are not changing anything at the code level, i dont think so -
the same setup works for me here as well, how about we push this change
with the next release bump - I presume 4.4 is something we can start
working with soon ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
that are otherwise well isolated; but those changes
are still being executed upstream, no idea when its going to make it
into CentOS and other distro's.
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
://cloud.centos.org/centos/6/devel/CentOS-6-x86_64-xen-pv.bz2
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http
more
community oriented builds and scripts that go with them ( as opposed to
the official release process via AMP ).
please pester if you dont have what you need in the coming week.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org
of this ironed out already. Dario are
you on the centos-virt list ?
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http
to get the 6.5 images online and
an automated pipeline proposed ( hopefully, also adopted ) to get this
image injection speeded up in the future.
Regards
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
Hi,
Here is an interesting one - what can we do about this ?
Great problem to have though, I just want a dom0 128G to start with :)
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
On 01/17/2014 10:31 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
Here is an interesting one - what can we do about this ?
Great problem to have though, I just want a dom0 128G to start
with :)
- KB
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6911
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org
On 11/17/2013 12:57 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 11/15/2013 10:51 PM, JacobV wrote:
Do you just need to update the marketplace listing to support this or is
there more build work and time required.
because of the way we are setup in amp - its upto the amazon guys to
test new instance types
On 12/16/2013 06:33 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013, Karanbir Singh wrote:
hi
who wants to have a stab at the rhel7beta1 kernel ( 3.10 based ) to see
what is needed to enable dom0 support ? I suspect it wont be much, but
is merely a suspicion.
Unfortunately I can't even
On 12/20/2013 08:12 PM, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:35:11PM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
what sort of environ are you installing into ? I've now done a couple of
installs that atleast completed.
Likewise, I haven't tried a dom0 install yet, but I have one RHEL 7
Original Message
Subject: Building Xen on RHEL7
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 18:57:22 +
From: Wei Liu wei.l...@citrix.com
To: centos-virt@centos.org
Hi all
This is a record of how I build Xen on RHEL 7. Hope this is helpful for
people who want to package Xen for the upcoming
hi
who wants to have a stab at the rhel7beta1 kernel ( 3.10 based ) to see
what is needed to enable dom0 support ? I suspect it wont be much, but
is merely a suspicion.
regards,
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org
it and
lets see how best to make it work.
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
that interface in a manner that would allow other
distro's content to be consumed in a sane manner.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS
a reasonable feature spec ).
The CentOS images are not built with it, the CentOS images are build in
a replica install that runs inside the centos buildservices.
Regards
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
they need them. Does that sound reasonable ?
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
to support xapi?
We are working on xapi as well. But that looks to be targetting a
June/early July release. The Xen stack itself is pretty much in the
final rounds of release testing.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org
have a weekly syncup on irc - skipping this week, back next week -
please come along and join the fun. There is plenty of threads still
needing attention.
- Kb
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
On 05/27/2013 06:09 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi,
Here are the AMI's that we would like to push
CentOS-6 (updated to 2013-05-27 )
Also, is there any interest in CentOS-5 AMI's ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http
image; about 90% of
all instantiations failed with a xen/pae kernel error. I'm not sure why
the aki, in this case aki-b6aa75df, seems to get confused about the disk
hosted kernel type. If anyone else also sees this, let me know. for now,
I'm writing this off as a flaky something.
--
Karanbir
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
option.
thoughts ?
- Kb
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
with KVM guests.. however Xen as something called
Tmem that ultimately targets similar goals and works for pv guests
as-is, but needs a Tmem capable kernel in the HVM guest, if they are to
use it as well.
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key
On 02/08/2013 12:18 PM, Nux! wrote:
And FreeBSD doesn't look like it has it ... Thanks for the tip though,
very handy.
thats odd, are you sure ? Remember that FreeBSD runs as a pv guest in Xen.
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key
~ 20th Feb )
Regards
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 02/01/2013 06:11 PM, Michael Militzer wrote:
But the initial question was more than a month ago and instance-backed AMIs
are still not available in AWS MP - so did something go wrong here that
caused the instance-backed AMIs to not get published?
we should have this covered in the next few
wget, but would prefer to use rsync.
Select the repo you want / need, and use reposync. Remember that
anything on people.centos.org is just a personal build. Its not release,
and its not supported, and most likely will get no updates security or
otherwise.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389
for anyone to throw a kickstart at it, and have it deliver a working
image to the AWS ID specified.
Does that help answer your concern ?
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http
based, which would
solve a lot of issues. Failing that, perhaps we should look at bringing
in cloud-init ourselves ( or a better alternative )
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http
-opennebula.org/2012-December/021196.html
is a link to the announcement upstream, but feel free to either followup
here, on the centos-devel list or on the opennebula-users list.
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax
On 11/23/2012 05:52 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Thu, November 22, 2012 08:31, Karanbir Singh wrote:
hi guys,
So it turns out that Sydney is too new a zone and not in the regular
AWS
image-production-pipeline. Although that should get fixed soon, in the
mean time, should we go ahead
Hi,
On 11/14/2012 12:01 AM, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
Any update on this, please, Karanbir? I'd like to request a
virtualbox image as well, if I may, please.
There are plans for Vagrant images, would that ( minus the puppet / chef
stuff ) be enough for VirtualBox as well ?
--
Karanbir
privately before we start pushing publicly - if anyone can help with
that, please get in touch with me at kbsingh@ project domain or the
domain this email came from.
Thanks,
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax
interest in C-5/32 ? )
Also, whats the best way to publish these images in a way that they can
go away once the test-phase is done ( and ideally we really need them to
go away )
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax
EC2 specifically, so maybe public ami's there
as well.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-virt
On 10/04/2012 03:48 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Have you considered equipping these with cloud-init?
yes
I'm looking at the EPEL packaging today to see if we can base off from
there. For atleast 3 of the large vendors, cloud-init is almost a
must-have.
regards,
--
Karanbir Singh
+44
initially. The overall goal is to produce a
specific set of images, then ensure they are available across as wide a
base as possible ( so, cloud vendors, cloud stacks for public clouds,
various virt technologies and as many different file formats as we can )
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389
On 10/03/2012 05:29 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
As we get ready to start publishing Cloud Images ( or rather images
consumable in various virt platforms, including public and private
clouds ) - it would be great to have a baseline package manifest worked
out.
and.. thoughts on Selinux ? Disable
hate images. Provisioning from fresh is easy enough, fast
enough and manageable enough that images are almost always either the
wrong solution or a by-product requirement from a third party tool that
does not understand provisioning ( hello, all those so-called-cloud
solutions .. )
--
Karanbir Singh
level of trust management based on
that. Keep in mind that you need to have your provisioning happen in a
fairly secure environment itself, if you are going to add trust points
on signatures like this - specially if they are 'generated' on demand.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http
wondering if you really want to retain the 'stick with 6.0
endorsement'
- KB
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
On 01/04/2012 04:18 PM, Digimer wrote:
Just wondering if you really want to retain the 'stick with 6.0
endorsement'
Doh! I meant to remove that with 6.2's release... Fixed. Thank you for
catching that! :)
no worries, thanks for putting this together.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http
Hi,
On 08/31/2011 06:29 AM, Ian B wrote:
Citrix have open sourced their recently acquired cloud management
platform 'Cloudstack'. It apparently supports multiple hypervisors: Xen,
KVM, Vmware ESXi
the cloud.com stack has always been open - and as far as I know, citrix
are actually moving to
hi guys,
just wondering if anyone had feedback about this project :
http://karesansui-project.info/ ; I had a go at setting it up, and it
took about 5 minutes to get going and be productive.
their installer is extremely odd, its a tarball with RPMS ( although
they do provide a yum repo as
On 08/16/2011 11:44 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
I guess the question is how much such an interface buys you compared to
lets say virt-manager?
For me, its partially about the interface - but a lot more about the api
and the management-via-code process that is important. I've been looking
Hi,
On 07/27/2011 01:48 PM, Grant McWilliams wrote:
Or ban Indonesia since that's where it's coming from. I can post a
comment with anyone's email as the reply to address.
Thats a bit silly. If we did something like that, USA would have no
email worth talking about given that most spam
On 07/11/2011 12:50 PM, Matt Paine wrote:
Hope someone can point me in the right direction. I would like to get
into LXC and evaluate its usefulness compared with Linux-VServer. I
notice that LXC is in tech preview upstream, however I am at a dead end
trying to figure out how to get started.
On 10/21/2010 12:01 AM, Grant McWilliams wrote:
So what we're on the verge of doing here is creating a test set... I'd
love to see a shell script that ran a bunch of tests, gathered data
about the system and then created an archive that would then be uploaded
to a website which created graphs.
On 10/20/2010 12:35 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Being skeptical is the best approach in the absence of
verifiable/falsifiable data. Today or tomorrow I'll get my hands on a new
host system and although it is supposed to go into production immediately I
will probably find some time to do
On 10/15/2010 02:00 PM, John L. Magee wrote:
One thing to possibly consider with PostgreSQL performance especially,
is that when using KVM VMs for some applications, PostgreSQL could be
run native. This is a viable approach with KVM that could never work
with Xen.
Can you expand on this a
On 10/15/2010 10:56 PM, compdoc wrote:
I think he's right. Run PostgreSQL on the centos host directly, rather than
from within a guest. The vm guests could access the database over the
virtual lan, so speed of access for guests on the same server wouldn't be an
issue.
I don't understand why
hi guys,
Just wondering if anyone has done any performance testing between kvm
and xen on CentOS-5 ( using centos as host and vm in every case ) ?
Regards,
--
Karanbir Singh
London, UK | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG
On 10/14/2010 07:48 AM, Tom Bishop wrote:
I think xen is still on top in terms of performance and featuresnow
that is indeed what it 'feels' like, but I'm quite keen on putting some
numbers on that.
having said that my experience in the past with kvm and my latest
testing with 5.5 and
On 09/01/2010 09:18 PM, David Knierim wrote:
I am investigating building a live CD image to be used as KVM host
and then putting that image on a USB key (to end up with a environment
similar to ESXi). I see tools in in Fedora for both tasks, but I
have not seen them in CentOS.
Are these
On 01/22/2010 12:40 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4042
This one I can fix :)
--
Karanbir Singh
London, UK| http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
on bugs.c.o - it should not be more than a few hours / week
in terms of commitment.
Thanks for considering.
--
Karanbir Singh
London, UK| http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
or just plain minicom. I only have 2 such 'cross wired console
pairs' of machines now ( so 4 in all ). Most of the rest have proper
lights out management and I run a private management network ( or try to
anyway )
--
Karanbir Singh
London, UK| http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com
time to
invest in a null-modem cable and get serial console redirection setup
between pairs of machines. :)
--
Karanbir Singh
kbsi...@karan.org | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
On 28/09/09 17:37, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
So what i do since then is to use lvm in the domU as well and add a new
xvd block device to the domU (aka a new LV on the dom0) and then the
traditionnal pvcreate/vgextend/lvextend. Working correctly for all my
domU's ..
how are you able to add a new
On 07/27/2009 02:15 PM, Dennis J. wrote:
Hi,
What is the best way to deal with I/O load when running several VMs on a
physical machine with local or remote storage?
have you looked at :
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/ioband/
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
On 06/29/2009 07:59 AM, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
That's not on the dom0 side, but directly in the w2k3 domU .. : you'll
get *bad* performances (at IO and network level) if the xenpv drivers
for Windows aren't installed .. Unfortunately you will not be able to
find them for CentOS. (While
On 06/29/2009 10:30 AM, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
I will definitely look at such an option, but I do not want to go custom
with my CentOS implementation, and I am only going to use the windows
2k3 domU as domain controller and print server, so if it does not
negatively impact speed of other PV
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
My suggestion is to go install
http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/lfarkas.repo in your
/etc/yumconfig.d folder and run yum install virt-manager
Whats wrong with the virt-manage etc already included in CentOS ?
- KB
mattias wrote:
Thanks
But way will not the included ramdisk and kernel not work?
as has already been pointed out to you, your issue is no longer CentOS
specific and you should ask on the Ubuntu forums / lists.
- KB
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
; rest of the steps you
mentioned are ignorable / local site policy driven, have no implications
with the issue.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/
GnuPG Public Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt
Michael Kress wrote:
As far as I gathered from different sources, RHEL 5.3 will be in Testing
Phase until begin of January. Shortly after, we could expect RHEL 5.3 to
be released and then again shortly after we could expect CentOS 5.3 to be
released in about February/March. Am I right?
We
and there is plenty of docs and help around to
help when you need it.
Fix the problems you come up against, and if one of them needs an
upgrade out of the distro packages - consider it at the time.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED
, for switches routers, but I can't get Cacti to graph
an individual VM on the server.
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all
Can someone please tell me how to monitor each VM's traffic
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I'm looking for something similar to Cacti / MRTG - but something that
can graph traffic for each IP / VM on a server
humm... Cacti or mrtg would work fine if it targets the interface and
the resources on the inside of the vm. for all purposes it should not
matter if the
Guys FYI,
A couple of people from VirtualIron got in touch with me following on
from the flexiscale donation (we have a few i386/x86_64 VM's hosted
there, we == CentOS Project, that the QA guys are looking at using to do
some of their work in )
Over the next few days, the Virtual Iron guys
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
