Fri 2/19/2010 Kenni Lund ke...@kelu.dk
Do your own testing if in doubt.
OK.
Hosts:
Centos 5.4 with kvm, and latest (yum) updates. The switch is
a 3com gigabit switch. These are production servers and each
has guests doing actual work, but the servers' cpus are idle
most of the time.
Guests:
2010/2/20 S.Tindall tindall.sat...@brandxmail.com:
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 02:41 +0100, Kenni Lund wrote:
2010/2/18 compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com:
I would also just use the e1000 emulation. Theres nothing
better about the virtio devices...
...other than lower CPU utilization and higher
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 14:10 +0100, Kenni Lund wrote:
2010/2/20 S.Tindall tindall.sat...@brandxmail.com:
Are you using test-signed drivers or do you have a redistributable
source for release-signed drivers (that chain to a microsoft root)?
I don't think that anyone are talking about
2010/2/18 compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com:
I would also just use the e1000 emulation. Theres nothing
better about the virtio devices...
...other than lower CPU utilization and higher throughout? Since these
are CentOS/RHEL guests, I wouldn't even consider using e1000, I would
just go for
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 02:41 +0100, Kenni Lund wrote:
2010/2/18 compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com:
I would also just use the e1000 emulation. Theres nothing
better about the virtio devices...
...other than lower CPU utilization and higher throughout? Since these
are CentOS/RHEL guests, I
Hi all,
I need to move ten CentOS/RHEL 5.4 vmware guests from a vmware ESXi 4 host to
a
CentOS 5.4 KVM host (fully patched). But I have two doubts.
First: all these guests have two e1000 network drivers defined as a eth0,eth1
and
modprobe.conf file is the same on all:
alias eth0 e1000
