On 06/16/2014 08:55 PM, Sven Kieske wrote:
> A bridge does not need an ip address
> itself to pass traffic from interface A
> to interface C,
Correct, but...
> so it could look like this:
>
> hw interface a <---> bridge b <---> vm interface c
> 192.168.1.3 none192.168.1.4
Wron
This is wrong.
A bridge does not need an ip address
itself to pass traffic from interface A
to interface C, so it could look like this:
hw interface a <---> bridge b <---> vm interface c
192.168.1.3 none192.168.1.4
Keep in mind that bridging takes place on layer 2:
https://en
SilverTip257 writes:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:42 AM, lee wrote:
>
>> Peter writes:
>>
>> > On 06/12/2014 05:17 PM, lee wrote:
>> >> I knew before I started that network setup would be a PITA because years
>> >> ago, I set up a VM for someone who didn't have a 64bit system to compile
>> >> a
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:42 AM, lee wrote:
> Peter writes:
>
> > On 06/12/2014 05:17 PM, lee wrote:
> >> I knew before I started that network setup would be a PITA because years
> >> ago, I set up a VM for someone who didn't have a 64bit system to compile
> >> a 64bit version of some software.
Peter writes:
> On 06/12/2014 05:17 PM, lee wrote:
>> I knew before I started that network setup would be a PITA because years
>> ago, I set up a VM for someone who didn't have a 64bit system to compile
>> a 64bit version of some software. The network setup being so
>> ridiculously difficult has
