On 07/24/2017 03:05 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:
> On 07/20/2017 03:14 PM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Kevin Stange wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/20/2017 05:31 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/20/2017 03:14 PM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Kevin Stange wrote:
>
>> On 07/20/2017 05:31 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>
On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
On 21/07/2017 18:26, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/21/2017 06:06 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I will happily create a test kernel with SLAB .. what is your config
file diff?
I have just choosed SLAB allocator in menuconfig.
It has implied several other
On 07/21/2017 06:06 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> I will happily create a test kernel with SLAB .. what is your config
>> file diff?
>
> I have just choosed SLAB allocator in menuconfig.
> It has implied several other internal configurations
On 07/21/2017 06:06 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> I will happily create a test kernel with SLAB .. what is your config
>> file diff?
>
> I have just choosed SLAB allocator in menuconfig.
> It has implied several other internal configurations
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I will happily create a test kernel with SLAB .. what is your config
file diff?
I have just choosed SLAB allocator in menuconfig.
It has implied several other internal configurations changes.
Overall differencess (config file patch) is in
On 07/20/2017 03:14 PM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Kevin Stange wrote:
>
>> On 07/20/2017 05:31 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>
On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Kevin Stange wrote:
On 07/20/2017 05:31 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Are the testing
On 07/20/2017 05:31 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6,
with the one config file change) working
On 2017-07-19 02:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6,
with the one config file change) working for everyone:
(turn off: CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM)
Hello.
Maybe it's not the most
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
But one has changed much between 4.9.13 and 4.9.25: kernel size and
configuration.
4.9.13 size was 6MB and 4.9.24 is 7.1MB. Many modules have been
compiled into kernel, here is shortened, but
On 07/19/2017 09:23 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6,
>>> with the one config file change) working for everyone:
>>>
>>> (turn off:
On 07/19/2017 04:27 AM, Piotr Gackiewicz wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6,
>> with the one config file change) working for everyone:
>>
>> (turn off: CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM)
>
> Hello.
> Maybe it's not
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Are the testing kernels (kernel-4.9.37-29.el7 and kernel-4.9.37-29.el6,
with the one config file change) working for everyone:
(turn off: CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM)
Hello.
Maybe it's not the most appropriate thread or time, but I have been
signalling
On 07/17/2017 09:47 AM, Kristián Feldsam wrote:
> Hello, is this kernel usable also for KVM or is only for XEN?
>
>
It certainly will work with KVM (I use it on my KVM test server and my
xen test server.
But a better kernel probably for KVm is here:
On 07/17/2017 09:47 AM, Kristián Feldsam wrote:
> Hello, is this kernel usable also for KVM or is only for XEN?
This kernel is intended for the Xen repos. None of us are testing it
with KVM to my knowledge, but it may work. The KVM-related virt SIG
repos don't include a custom kernel.
This
Hello, is this kernel usable also for KVM or is only for XEN?
S pozdravem Kristián Feldsam
Tel.: +420 773 303 353, +421 944 137 535
E-mail.: supp...@feldhost.cz
www.feldhost.cz - FeldHost™ – profesionální hostingové a serverové služby za
adekvátní ceny.
FELDSAM s.r.o.
V rohu 434/3
Praha 4 –
18 matches
Mail list logo