If I understand that paper correctly, HVM+VT-d outperforms PV by quite a
lot (if you have VT-d support on your system).
Thanks for that link. Just to make my criticism of the initial claim more
clear: I don't claim that HVM can never be faster than PV but that you need
to understand when
On 10/20/2010 08:12 AM, Grant McWilliams wrote:
If I understand that paper correctly, HVM+VT-d outperforms PV by quite
a
lot (if you have VT-d support on your system).
Thanks for that link. Just to make my criticism of the initial claim more
clear: I don't claim
On 10/20/2010 12:35 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Being skeptical is the best approach in the absence of
verifiable/falsifiable data. Today or tomorrow I'll get my hands on a new
host system and although it is supposed to go into production immediately I
will probably find some time to do
Ok so I'd like to help, since most folks have Intel Chipsets, I have a AMD
4p(16 core)/32gig memory opteron server that I'm running that we can get
some numbers onbut it would be nice if we could run apples to apples...I
have iozone loaded and can run that but would be nice to run using the
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Tom Bishop bisho...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok so I'd like to help, since most folks have Intel Chipsets, I have a AMD
4p(16 core)/32gig memory opteron server that I'm running that we can get
some numbers onbut it would be nice if we could run apples to apples...I
