Re: [CentOS-virt] Getting guest to detect new drive without reboot

2011-09-20 Thread Ian Forde
Partprobe Sent from my iPad On Sep 19, 2011, at 21:51, Emmanuel Noobadmin centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote: I've got a CentOS 5.6 guest running on 6.0 host. Using virsh attach-disk, I attached a new raw file as vdc However, the guest does not detect this new disk. In the past, I've used the

Re: [CentOS-virt] Getting guest to detect new drive without reboot

2011-09-20 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/20/11, Ian Forde ianfo...@gmail.com wrote: Partprobe Thanks for pointing this out, although due to time pressure I did the nasty in the end, kicked everybody off and rebooted the server. But I'll keep this in mind the next time I need to do this again, probably sooner than later.

[CentOS-virt] Network traffic control/shaping of guest interfaces

2011-09-20 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
I've been using tc/htb for network control previously to control bandwidth available to different services running on their own IPs on a unvirtualized host. Now, I have put them into their own guest VM. I would like to be able to do something similar to ensure the more crucial service gets more

Re: [CentOS-virt] Network traffic control/shaping of guest interfaces

2011-09-20 Thread Nenad Opsenica
On 09/20/2011 08:20 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: I can't put the restrictions within the guest because I don't want the individual VM admins to be able to stop the script from running. On my new host, I have bridged networking with br0, eth0 and guests running off vnetn. I've tried

Re: [CentOS-virt] Network traffic control/shaping of guest interfaces

2011-09-20 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/21/11, Nenad Opsenica ne...@panline.net wrote: I would convert bridged setup on host to the routed one. Then you will have several separate interfaces on host, each one used for communication with only one guest and it will be easy to attach tc to them. In other words, there's no

Re: [CentOS-virt] Network traffic control/shaping of guest interfaces

2011-09-20 Thread Nenad Opsenica
On 09/20/2011 08:44 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: On 9/21/11, Nenad Opsenicane...@panline.net wrote: I would convert bridged setup on host to the routed one. Then you will have several separate interfaces on host, each one used for communication with only one guest and it will be easy to

Re: [CentOS-virt] Network traffic control/shaping of guest interfaces

2011-09-20 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/21/11, Nenad Opsenica ne...@panline.net wrote: You can combine bridged and routed setup - for example, use bridging for storage, routing for internet and user access. Using routed setup have one more advantage - you can use firewall on host to filter guests' traffic. Thanks for the

Re: [CentOS-virt] KVM CO 5.6 VM guest crashes running iSCSI

2011-09-20 Thread Momonth
It was resolved by re-installing the KVM host with CentOS 6.0, unfortunately there is not official CentOS 5.6 - CentOS 6.0 upgrade path. Vladimir On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Momonth momo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I'm running KVM host on CentOS 5.6 x64, all of my guests are CO 5.6 x64