On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 11:27 -0500, Scott Dowdle wrote:
There are uses where Xen is much better suited and OpenVZ isn't even a
viable option. But there are other cases where OpenVZ is a better fit
especially with regards to density and scalability. OpenVZ is also
very attractive in those
On 2/20/08, Tim Verhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not see the problems you are having but I have a set of Xen
hosts and by default I limit the memory usage of the dom0 to 512MB
using the dom0_mem option that you mentioned. In my case the dom0's
are not doing anything so why do they
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Allen Tsang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By Paravirtualization, I mean the installation of tools or guest
additions type packages, which present virtual interfaces to the guest OS.
So in VMware, a component of this would mean setting ethernet0.virtualDev =
vmxnet,
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 5:10 PM, David Hláčik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, i am trying to build a custom xen kernel from CentOS source kernel rpm .
What i want to achieve is to have custom domU kernel without modules, which
will boot domU machine without having /lib/modules .
[snip]
Why would
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:31 AM, carlopmart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somebody have tried kvm under centos 5/5.1/5.2?? How stable and usable is
it?? Any tip?? After redhat news about support kvm in the future I think
that software will be more releveant in virtulized environments.
It works
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Justin Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideal when 3.2 xen will be avail for centos?
When the upstream distribution provides it. I am not sure if it is on
their roadmap. Of course, you could also use Xen 3.2 from XenSource,
but that's not supported here.
Take
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Jerry Amundson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Short story:
Would it be possible to get
kernel-debuginfo-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL.x86_64.rpm on di.c.o?
I have a need to run crash on a 2.6.9-67.0.20.ELxenU xm dump-core.
Debuginfo packages are available from:
Hi Farkas,
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Farkas Levente lfar...@lfarkas.org wrote:
after a long time it seems the current packages which needed for kvm on
centos-5 host seems to working (ie. worth to change). my repo:
http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/SRPMS/
contains the