Hello,
I've been using Xen4CentOS for the last 3 months. It's working fine and
dom0/domUs are stable but the server does a kernel panic when doing a
reboot and the server has to be hard reset manually. It has kernel panic on
the 3 last reboot.
Please stand by while rebooting the system...
INFO:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:17 AM, David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.comwrote:
On 05/03/14 15:09, Karl Johnson wrote:
I've been using Xen4CentOS for the last 3 months. It's working fine and
dom0/domUs are stable but the server does a kernel panic when doing a
reboot and the server has
I don't think it's related to microcode_ctl as my server was rebooting just
fine before switching to Xen4CentOS in December 2013, then the reboot issue
started. Note that it's not only on Dell servers but also Supermicro so I
don't think it's hardware related too.
Karl
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at
Hello,
I am running two dom0s, one on CentOS 5 with Xen 4.1.2 (from Gitco) and the
other one on CentOS 6 with Xen 4.2.4 (from Xen4CentOS). I host one LVM
based domU on both from the same template (CentOS 6 PV) with the same Xen
config (see below). However, the domU on Xen 4.1 reports itself as
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 5:36 AM, George Dunlap dunl...@umich.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Karl Johnson karljohnson...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I am running two dom0s, one on CentOS 5 with Xen 4.1.2 (from Gitco) and
the
other one on CentOS 6 with Xen 4.2.4 (from
Hello,
I have the following error with Xen 4.2.4-33 when stopping xendomains:
Shutting down Xen domains: Domain-0(skip)
xen101(save)..
xen101(save)
xen102(save).
An error occurred while saving domain:
Error: Domain '9' does not exist.
!
(shut).
An error occurred while shutting
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 05:09:56PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
I've got Xen 4.4.2 in virt6-testing. I haven't had a chance to test
it, and won't for another week or two; but if some volunteers can put
it through its
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Sarah Newman wrote:
> I experienced a bug that is likely the same as https://bugs.launchpad.net/
> ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1350373 . Commit
> b7dd0e350e0bd4c0fddcc9b8958342700b00b168 , which is supposed to fix it,
> doesn't appear in this kernel
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Karl Johnson <karljohnson...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Akemi Yagi <amy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Akemi Yagi <amy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 23
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Akemi Yagi <amy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Akemi Yagi <amy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Karl Johnson <karljohnson...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>&g
Hello,
I can also reproduce with Xen 4.8.2-10.el6:
(XEN) d6v0: unhandled page fault (ec=)
(XEN) Pagetable walk from 0028:
(XEN) L4[0x000] =
(XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S: fault at 82d08023d440
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on
> this
> list,
> > and a patch was applied to virt-sig kernel aswell?
> >
> > Call trace looks similar..
>
> Good memory! I'd forgotten about that
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 4:43 AM Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 01:21:01PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:22:19PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I updated my PR: [3
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 2:07 PM Karl Johnson
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 4:43 AM Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 01:21:01PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 04:22:19PM -0500, Karl Johnso
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:44 AM Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:49:30PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 10:35:56PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote:
> > >Hello,
> > >I built 4.9.155
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:13 AM Anthony PERARD
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:12:40PM -0500, Karl Johnson wrote:
> > I built 4.9.161, works for me on el6:
> >
> > [root@node-tmp1 ~]# cat /proc/version
> > Linux version 4.9.161-34.el6.x86_64 (mockbu...@bui
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 1:42 PM Sarah Newman wrote:
> On 3/7/19 10:30 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 9:42 AM George Dunlap wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> We've been on 4.9 for some time now, and while it's still supported, I
> >> think it's time to start thinking about
Hello,
I built 4.9.155 for both el6 and el7, you can test them here:
https://repo.aerisnetwork.com/archive/kernel-4.9.155-34.el6.x86_64.rpm
https://repo.aerisnetwork.com/archive/kernel-4.9.155-34.el7.x86_64.rpm
It works fine for me so far on el6, I'll update my pull request later on
GitHub with
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 1:12 PM George Dunlap wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> This mail has been a long time in coming, but with the upcoming
> expiration of security support for Xen 4.8, it's time to start thinking
> about what our update policy will be for the Xen packages in general.
>
> Citrix is
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 4:56 AM Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hello and Happy 2020!
>
> Do we already have a plan to update the xen-412 branch to recent release
> of Xen 4.12.2 ?
>
> I'm happy to test once the rpms are out.
>
>
>
Anthony built 4.12.2 few weeks ago, see
20 matches
Mail list logo