On 28-03-2017 8:12, Kevin Stange wrote:
On 03/27/2017 04:03 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:
On 03/25/2017 02:35 PM, Sarah Newman wrote:
On 03/16/2017 04:22 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:
I still can't rest assured the NIC issue is fixed, but no 4.4 or
4.9
server has yet had a NIC issue, with some being up
On 03/27/2017 04:03 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:
> On 03/25/2017 02:35 PM, Sarah Newman wrote:
>> On 03/16/2017 04:22 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:
>>
I still can't rest assured the NIC issue is fixed, but no 4.4 or 4.9
server has yet had a NIC issue, with some being up almost a full month.
It
On 03/25/2017 02:35 PM, Sarah Newman wrote:
> On 03/16/2017 04:22 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:
>
>>> I still can't rest assured the NIC issue is fixed, but no 4.4 or 4.9
>>> server has yet had a NIC issue, with some being up almost a full month.
>>> It looks promising! (I'm knocking on all the wood
On 03/16/2017 04:22 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:
>> I still can't rest assured the NIC issue is fixed, but no 4.4 or 4.9
>> server has yet had a NIC issue, with some being up almost a full month.
>> It looks promising! (I'm knocking on all the wood everywhere, though.)
>
> I'm ready to call this
On 02/24/2017 11:51 AM, Kevin Stange wrote:
> On 02/21/2017 05:32 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:
>> On 02/21/2017 11:50 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 02/21/2017 11:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Kevin,
Please try the 4.9.11-22 kernel that I just released for CentOS-6 (along
On 02/21/2017 05:32 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:
> On 02/21/2017 11:50 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 02/21/2017 11:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Kevin,
>>>
>>> Please try the 4.9.11-22 kernel that I just released for CentOS-6 (along
>>> with the newer linux-firmare packages and xfsprogs).
On 02/21/2017 11:50 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 02/21/2017 11:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>>
>> Kevin,
>>
>> Please try the 4.9.11-22 kernel that I just released for CentOS-6 (along
>> with the newer linux-firmare packages and xfsprogs).
>>
>> If you enable the xen-testing repository in your
On 14-02-2017 5:08, Kevin Stange wrote:
On 02/12/2017 05:07 PM, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
[...]
Thanks for the heads-up Kevin, appreciated. One thing I need to
clarify,
though: what kernel was this machine running at the time?
Kernel running at the time was the Virt SIG's 3.18.44-20 kernel.
As
On 02/12/2017 05:07 PM, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
> On 11/02/17 06:29, Kevin Stange wrote:
>> On 01/30/2017 06:41 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:
>>> On 01/30/2017 06:12 PM, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
On 31/01/17 10:49, Kevin Stange wrote:
> You said 3.x kernels specifically. The kernel on Xen Made Easy now
On 11/02/17 06:29, Kevin Stange wrote:
On 01/30/2017 06:41 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:
On 01/30/2017 06:12 PM, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
On 31/01/17 10:49, Kevin Stange wrote:
You said 3.x kernels specifically. The kernel on Xen Made Easy now is a
4.4 kernel. Any chance you have tested with that one?
On 01/30/2017 06:41 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:
> On 01/30/2017 06:12 PM, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
>> On 31/01/17 10:49, Kevin Stange wrote:
>>> You said 3.x kernels specifically. The kernel on Xen Made Easy now is a
>>> 4.4 kernel. Any chance you have tested with that one?
>>
>> Not yet, however the
On 31/01/17 21:00, Jinesh Choksi wrote:
On 30 January 2017 at 22:17, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
May I chip in here? In our environment we're randomly seeing:
Jan 17 23:40:14 xen01 kernel: ixgbe :04:00.1 eth6: Detected Tx
Unit Hang
Someone in this thread:
On 30 January 2017 at 22:17, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
> May I chip in here? In our environment we're randomly seeing:
>
> Jan 17 23:40:14 xen01 kernel: ixgbe :04:00.1 eth6: Detected Tx Unit
> Hang
>
Someone in this thread: https://sourceforge.net/p/e1000/bugs/530/#2855
On 01/30/2017 06:12 PM, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
> On 31/01/17 10:49, Kevin Stange wrote:
>> You said 3.x kernels specifically. The kernel on Xen Made Easy now is a
>> 4.4 kernel. Any chance you have tested with that one?
>
> Not yet, however the future Xen nodes we'll deploy will run CentOS 7 and
>
On 31/01/17 10:49, Kevin Stange wrote:
You said 3.x kernels specifically. The kernel on Xen Made Easy now is a
4.4 kernel. Any chance you have tested with that one?
Not yet, however the future Xen nodes we'll deploy will run CentOS 7 and
Xen with kernel 4.4.
Did you ever try without
On 01/30/2017 04:17 PM, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
> On 28/01/17 05:21, Kevin Stange wrote:
>> On 01/27/2017 06:08 AM, Karel Hendrych wrote:
>>> Have you tried to eliminate all power management features all over?
>>
>> I've been trying to find and disable all power management features but
>> having
On 01/30/2017 02:15 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 01/30/2017 12:59 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:
>> On 01/30/2017 03:18 AM, Jinesh Choksi wrote:
Are there other kernel options that might be useful to try?
>>>
>>> pci=nomsi
>>>
>>>
On 01/30/2017 12:59 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:
> On 01/30/2017 03:18 AM, Jinesh Choksi wrote:
>>> Are there other kernel options that might be useful to try?
>>
>> pci=nomsi
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1521173/comments/13
>
> Incidentally, already found that one and
On 01/30/2017 03:18 AM, Jinesh Choksi wrote:
>>Are there other kernel options that might be useful to try?
>
> pci=nomsi
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1521173/comments/13
Incidentally, already found that one and I'm trying it currently on one
of the boxes. So far
>Are there other kernel options that might be useful to try?
pci=nomsi
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1521173/comments/13
On 27 January 2017 at 18:21, Kevin Stange wrote:
> On 01/27/2017 06:08 AM, Karel Hendrych wrote:
> > Have you tried to
On 01/27/2017 06:08 AM, Karel Hendrych wrote:
> Have you tried to eliminate all power management features all over?
I've been trying to find and disable all power management features but
having relatively little luck with that solving the problems. Stabbing
the the dark I've tried different ACPI
To: centos-virt@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-virt] NIC Stability Problems Under Xen 4.4 / CentOS 6 /
Linux 3.18
Has anyone experienced similar issues with this configuration, and if so,
does anyone have tips on how to resolve the issues?
Honeslty I would email Intel and see if they can help
;> card. Hope that helps!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Xlord
>>>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>>>> From: CentOS-virt [mailto:centos-virt-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
>>>>>>> Kevin
>>
gt; Xlord
>>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>>> From: CentOS-virt [mailto:centos-virt-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
>>>>>> Kevin
>>>>>> Stange
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 1:04 AM
>>>>>
entOS-virt [mailto:centos-virt-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
>>>>> Kevin
>>>>> Stange
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 1:04 AM
>>>>> To: centos-virt@centos.org
>>>>> Subject: [CentOS-virt] NIC Stability Problems Under Xen
t;>> Stange
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 1:04 AM
>>>> To: centos-virt@centos.org
>>>> Subject: [CentOS-virt] NIC Stability Problems Under Xen 4.4 / CentOS 6 /
>>>> Linux 3.18
>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> Has a
C
>>> card. Hope that helps!
>>>
>>> Xlord
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: CentOS-virt [mailto:centos-virt-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Kevin
>>> Stange
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 1:04 AM
>>> To: centos-virt@cen
ginal Message-
>> From: CentOS-virt [mailto:centos-virt-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Kevin
>> Stange
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 1:04 AM
>> To: centos-virt@centos.org
>> Subject: [CentOS-virt] NIC Stability Problems Under Xen 4.4 / Cen
g] On Behalf Of Kevin
> Stange
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 1:04 AM
> To: centos-virt@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS-virt] NIC Stability Problems Under Xen 4.4 / CentOS 6 /
> Linux 3.18
>
> I have three different types of CentOS 6 Xen 4.4 based hypervisors (by
> hardware)
I have three different types of CentOS 6 Xen 4.4 based hypervisors (by
hardware) that are experiencing stability issues which I haven't been
able to track down. All three types seem to be having issues with NIC
and/or PCIe. In most cases, the issues are unrecoverable and require a
hard boot to
30 matches
Mail list logo