On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:28:07AM -0400, Digimer wrote:
Would you mind elaborating on this? If a snapshot is a point-in-time
image of a VM (or even normal FS), why would DB backups be at risk
(assuming things like fsync are used)?
I'm asking in general terms... no idea if this is
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
Would you mind elaborating on this? If a snapshot is a point-in-time
image of a VM (or even normal FS), why would DB backups be at risk
(assuming things like fsync are used)?
I'm asking in general terms... no idea if this is
On 09/03/14 11:52 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
Would you mind elaborating on this? If a snapshot is a point-in-time
image of a VM (or even normal FS), why would DB backups be at risk
(assuming things like fsync are used)?
I'm
On 09/03/14 11:43 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:28:07AM -0400, Digimer wrote:
Would you mind elaborating on this? If a snapshot is a point-in-time
image of a VM (or even normal FS), why would DB backups be at risk
(assuming things like fsync are used)?
I'm asking in
https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=481859#481859
https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=453572#453572
This is a timebomb waiting to strike so many people who like do daily snapshot
backups and keep them for few weeks and not realizing their snapshots are
useless if