Am 13.02.2011 14:25, schrieb Bruce Ferrell:
so far all the mirrors I've checked have 3.9 in the directory for 3.x
Can anyone tell me how to get back versions? I'm looking for 3.4 or 3.5
Thanks in advance
Bruce Ferrell
http://vault.centos.org/
Alexander
I have several CentOS5 hosts in a VMware ESX 3.5.0 226117 environment
using iSCSI storage. Recently we've begun to experience journal aborts
resulting in remounted-read-only filesystems as well as other filesystem
issues - I can unmount a filesystem and force a check with fsck -f and
occasionally
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Lamar Owen wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 64 bit php 5.2 huge problem
On Saturday, February 12, 2011 07:03:59 pm Peter Ivanov wrote:
My mysql.so is about 50K .. is that nornal
No; the ones
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011, Peter Ivanov wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Peter Ivanov boksi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 64 bit php 5.2 huge problem
Thnaks Again,
i guess i wont update the server until i find more info...
i am happy it works now
Personally
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
I have several CentOS5 hosts in a VMware ESX 3.5.0 226117 environment
using iSCSI storage. Recently we've begun to experience journal aborts
resulting in remounted-read-only filesystems as well as other
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
I have several CentOS5 hosts in a VMware ESX 3.5.0 226117 environment
using iSCSI storage. Recently we've begun to experience journal aborts
resulting in remounted-read-only filesystems as well as other
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Bruce Ferrell bferr...@baywinds.org wrote:
so far all the mirrors I've checked have 3.9 in the directory for 3.x
Can anyone tell me how to get back versions? I'm looking for 3.4 or 3.5
Thanks in advance
Bruce Ferrell
Bruce, *why*? Given that RHEL 3 was
Did somebody can give me some advises on hardware for building a Centos linux
server?
---
Michel Donais___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michel Donais said the following on 13/02/11 16:26:
Did somebody can give me some advises on hardware for building a Centos linux
server?
What will you put on that server?
Ciao,
luigi
- --
/
+--[Luigi Rosa]--
\
I used to wish the universe were
On 02/13/2011 10:26 AM, Michel Donais wrote:
Did somebody can give me some advises on hardware for building a Centos
linux server?
Look for vendors that specifically list Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 as a
supported operating system. Most major vendors should offer servers with
this support.
If
what about looking in the archives? You are really not the first person
asking this.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011, Keith Roberts wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Keith Roberts ke...@karsites.net
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 64 bit php 5.2 huge problem
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011, Lamar Owen wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Lamar Owen
On 13.2.2011 01:50, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Feb 12, 2011, at 7:28 PM, Peter Ivanov wrote:
PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library
'/usr/lib64/php/modules/mysql.so' - libmysqlclient.so.15: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0
Run
ldd
Does any one know how to, if at all possible currently, to export a
block device via eSATA? i.e. how do I do something like iSCSI, but
over eSATA?
I have a cheat ($15 probably?) media player at home (Egreat EG-M31B
Network Media Tank - awesome little machine) that runs some flavor of
Debian and
On 02/13/11 10:53 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Does any one know how to, if at all possible currently, to export a
block device via eSATA? i.e. how do I do something like iSCSI, but
over eSATA?
I have a cheat ($15 probably?) media player at home (Egreat EG-M31B
Network Media Tank - awesome little
At Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:00:39 -0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On 02/13/11 10:53 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Does any one know how to, if at all possible currently, to export a
block device via eSATA? i.e. how do I do something like iSCSI, but
over eSATA?
I have a cheat
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
At Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:00:39 -0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On 02/13/11 10:53 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Does any one know how to, if at all possible currently, to export a
block device via eSATA?
Setting:
We are setting up a low usage server for an alfresco km/collaboration system
It is a low-end server with a pair of 1.5 TB disks we will be mirroring
The server comes with Intel's on-board 'fake raid/ low-end RAID' capability
and for price reasons we have not selected a mainstream RAID
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:07 PM, David Hornford d...@qillaq.com wrote:
Setting:
We are setting up a low usage server for an alfresco km/collaboration system
It is a low-end server with a pair of 1.5 TB disks we will be mirroring
The server comes with Intel's on-board 'fake raid/ low-end RAID'
People usually suspend their laptop, so that they can continue their work
when they open the laptop. OK!
Two choices [GNOME]:
1 - Menu -gt; Shut Down -gt; Suspend
in this case, the gnome-screensaver locks the PC. but the gnome-screensaver is
just a normal process, and it could be killed
Hi
Also seeing this issue with CentOS 5.4 and 5.5 with NFS shared storage,
according the the VMware knowledge base article this should have been resolved
in v5.1 update??.
Does changing the vm.min_free_kbytes value apply CentOS v.5.4 and 5.5 as well
to resolve the issue?
On 13 Feb 2011, at
At Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:58:11 +0200 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
At Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:00:39 -0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On 02/13/11 10:53 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Does
At Sun, 13 Feb 2011 13:07:09 -0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Setting:
We are setting up a low usage server for an alfresco km/collaboration system
It is a low-end server with a pair of 1.5 TB disks we will be mirroring
The server comes with Intel's on-board 'fake
On 02/13/11 12:28 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
it is no different than with
USB or Firewire devices. There is the 'host' side and there is the
'device' side. They are different.
actually, firewire is a peer to peer bus, like ethernet. there's no
'host' or 'device', there is just firewire.
On 2/13/11 1:58 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Sure, I understand what you're saying, but the question is: If they
can do it with a cheap device like this, then surely one should be
able todo it with a normal / server motherboard? Obviously they won't
tell us their secrets, so I need to dig around to
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/13/11 1:58 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Sure, I understand what you're saying, but the question is: If they
can do it with a cheap device like this, then surely one should be
able todo it with a normal / server
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 12:26 PM, erikmccaskey64
erikmccaske...@zoho.com wrote:
People usually suspend their laptop, so that they can continue their work
when they open the laptop. OK!
Two choices [GNOME]:
1 - Menu - Shut Down - Suspend
in this case, the gnome-screensaver locks the PC. but
On 02/13/11 1:21 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I'm trying to build a dense eSATA enclosure with say 16 or 24 drives :)
thats a stunningly bad way to go about it.
A) if you want JBOD, use a SAS/SATA enclosure with a SAS host card, as
SATA doesn't support multichannel multiplexing.
or
B) if you want a
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:35 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 02/13/11 1:21 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I'm trying to build a dense eSATA enclosure with say 16 or 24 drives :)
thats a stunningly bad way to go about it.
A) if you want JBOD, use a SAS/SATA enclosure with a SAS host
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 13:22 -0800, Mark wrote:
There is a third option, hibernation, which you did not mention, but
essentially they are all more or less equally secure - they all
require login password authentication to resume operation once the
computer is brought back.
This is definitely
Before any possible answer can be given, the first question must be: What
do you plan to do with it?
You'r right, but I have to begin somewhere.
This hardware is intended to be a terminal server for at least 40 users
driven with LTSP.for BBx Pro-5 and Bbj applications
Need fast and huge
2011/2/14 Michel Donais don...@telupton.com:
Before any possible answer can be given, the first question must be: What
do you plan to do with it?
You'r right, but I have to begin somewhere.
This hardware is intended to be a terminal server for at least 40 users
driven with LTSP.for BBx Pro-5
On 02/13/11 2:42 PM, Michel Donais wrote:
I checked recently for an ASUS S775 P5Q-VM G45 PCIE MOTHERBOARD with an
INTEL CORE 2 QUAD Q9550 2.83G/1333/12M/S775 with SATA hard disc no Raid
I doesn't seem to be a server board and I'm not shure of that choice.
thats desktop hardware. no ECC
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 09:40 -0500, Kwan Lowe wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
I have several CentOS5 hosts in a VMware ESX 3.5.0 226117 environment
using iSCSI storage. Recently we've begun to experience journal aborts
resulting in
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 20:28 +, Keith Beeby wrote:
Also seeing this issue with CentOS 5.4 and 5.5 with NFS shared
storage, according the the VMware knowledge base article this should
have been resolved in v5.1 update??.
Does changing the vm.min_free_kbytes valu apply CentOS v.5.4 and 5.5
undetected creeping bit errors due to lack of ECC would
be, in my book, unacceptable.
Where can one find info or studies on this sort of thing? I use non-ecc ram
in several servers, and of course most ppl use it in their desktops.
Wouldn't bit errors result in crashes or data corruption? Or
On 2/13/11 7:55 PM, compdoc wrote:
undetected creeping bit errors due to lack of ECC would
be, in my book, unacceptable.
Where can one find info or studies on this sort of thing? I use non-ecc ram
in several servers, and of course most ppl use it in their desktops.
Wouldn't bit errors
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:55 PM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
undetected creeping bit errors due to lack of ECC would
be, in my book, unacceptable.
Where can one find info or studies on this sort of thing? I use non-ecc ram
in several servers, and of course most ppl use it in their
ECC allows for single bit errors to be corrected and multiple bit
errors to be noticed.
I know what it is and I've used it in the past, but I just don't see many
errors going on in desktop computers and servers that use non-ecc ram.
___
CentOS
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 19:21 -0700, compdoc wrote:
ECC allows for single bit errors to be corrected and multiple bit
errors to be noticed.
I know what it is and I've used it in the past, but I just don't see many
errors going on in desktop computers and servers that use non-ecc ram.
I
On Feb 13, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:35 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 02/13/11 1:21 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I'm trying to build a dense eSATA enclosure with say 16 or 24 drives :)
thats a stunningly bad way to go about
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:01 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 02/13/11 2:42 PM, Michel Donais wrote:
I checked recently for an ASUS S775 P5Q-VM G45 PCIE MOTHERBOARD with an
INTEL CORE 2 QUAD Q9550 2.83G/1333/12M/S775 with SATA hard disc no Raid
I doesn't seem to be a server
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 13, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Bruce Ferrell bferr...@baywinds.org wrote:
so far all the mirrors I've checked have 3.9 in the directory for 3.x
On 02/13/11 7:06 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
It's also possible to save the budget, buy *two* similarly powerful
used systems with much lesser hardware specs, and have genuine
failover instead of the shared vulnerability of one expensive server
with high-availability components as you
By doubling the hardware, you still do not overcome the potential corruption
that could occur with non-ecc memory. If this is truly a mission critical
application then it really does not serve much of a purpose to short change
yourself with substandard hardware.
-Original Message-
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:23 PM, David Brian Chait dch...@invenda.com wrote:
By doubling the hardware, you still do not overcome the potential corruption
that could occur with non-ecc memory. If this is truly a mission critical
application then it really does not serve much of a purpose to
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:23 PM, David Brian Chait dch...@invenda.com wrote:
By doubling the hardware, you still do not overcome the potential corruption
that could occur with non-ecc memory. If this is truly a mission critical
application then it really does not
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Rob Kampen rkam...@kampensonline.com wrote:
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Pleae, name a single instance in the last 10 years where ECC
demonstrably saved you work, especially if you made sure ti burn in
the ssytem components on servers upon their first bootup...
On 2/14/2011 12:29 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Rob Kampenrkam...@kampensonline.com
wrote:
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Pleae, name a single instance in the last 10 years where ECC
demonstrably saved you work, especially if you made sure ti burn in
the ssytem
On 02/13/2011 07:07 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 13, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Bruce Ferrell bferr...@baywinds.org
wrote:
so
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 13, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:35 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 02/13/11 1:21 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I'm trying to build a dense eSATA
On 02/13/2011 09:27 AM, Nataraj wrote:
Is there a simple way to directly install a vm on an lvm (or proably
seperate LVM's for root and swap)? For example something like:
lvcreate -L 10G -n testvm_root vg_myvg
lvcreate -L 1G -n testvm_swap
Then somehow setup the VM to be able to directly
On 02/13/2011 12:18 PM, Kenni Lund wrote:
2011/2/13 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de:
On 02/13/2011 09:27 AM, Nataraj wrote:
Is there a simple way to directly install a vm on an lvm (or proably
seperate LVM's for root and swap)? For example something like:
Use a volume group as a
On 02/13/2011 10:21 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Could you then pause the virtual machine and safely take an LVM
snapshot, continue the VM and then mount the snapshot on the host and do
a backup?
Probably not. If you pause the guest then the filesystem on it might be in
an inconsistent
On 02/13/2011 02:30 PM, Nataraj wrote:
On 02/13/2011 10:21 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Could you then pause the virtual machine and safely take an LVM
snapshot, continue the VM and then mount the snapshot on the host and do
a backup?
Probably not. If you pause the guest then the
55 matches
Mail list logo
