On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:27:16PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote:
Maybe having it said so publicly and be such a respected Linux community
member may help certain people wake up and smell the coffee.
Respected? I can't recall a single article of his that mentioned CentOS
that wasn't disparaging.
On 03/22/11 19:00, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Vladimir Budnev wrote:
2011/3/22m.r...@5-cent.us
CHOMP
So with 2 4-core Xeons, I don't understand how you can get 3x and 5x.
Could you post some raw messages, either from /var/log/message or
from /var/log/mcelog?
sure
This is not really CentOS-specific - sorry.
On a name server, I would like to log ns queries (specifically, queries
which result with no answer) regarding one domain (for which my ns is
authoritative). Is this possible?
I know you can turn on logging globally using the logging section of
Respected? I can't recall a single article of his that mentioned CentOS
that wasn't disparaging. I find such one-sided and opinionated writings
hard to respect.
Okay, maybe that was an assumption too far in regards to respect.
Perhaps not so one-sided if he had received an email
Many thanks for the rpm's. I had some evolution stored
documents that I really needed. I've applied them to
two systems.
Is it possible that the gnome panel problem is only on CRT's and
not LEDs? Seems like one of my systems fixed itself when
I changed monitors.
--
M Reynolds McClatchey Jr
Is the list dead, or just quiet all of the sudden?
--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux
Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Is the list dead, or just quiet all of the sudden?
I'm going to assume people have stopped whining now that their beloved
5.6 is out. :-)
--
Drew
This started out as a hobby and spun horribly out of control.
-Unknown
___
CentOS mailing list
On 4/20/2011 9:06 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Is the list dead, or just quiet all of the sudden?
--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux
Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
I think they exhausted themselves - all the
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Drew drew@gmail.com wrote:
Is the list dead, or just quiet all of the sudden?
I'm going to assume people have stopped whining now that their beloved
5.6 is out. :-)
--
HAHAH! Ok, that makes sense. For a moment I thought we were all banned from
the
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Is the list dead, or just quiet all of the sudden?
Yep, it's dead, and you didn't read this, either.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Ian Murray murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Okay, maybe that was an assumption too far in regards to respect.
Perhaps not so one-sided if he had received an email reply from the devs
assuming he did indeed send one to KB. To be fair, it does seem pretty lifted
On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote:
Hi,
I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used
ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the
network would sync from it. Since the update I cannot keep the right
time on the machine. This is with / without
://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20110420/c554842d/attachment-0001.bin
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 06:38:50 -0500
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2011:0408 CentOS 4 i386 x86_64 tzdata
Update
To: CentOS
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:06 AM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:27:16PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote:
Maybe having it said so publicly and be such a respected Linux community
member may help certain people wake up and smell the coffee.
Respected? I can't
On 19/04/2011 23:51, Kenni Lund wrote:
Den 19/04/2011 19.42 skrev Matt lm7...@gmail.com
mailto:lm7...@gmail.com:
On a running 64 bit CentOS 5.6 box is it possible to convert from Ext3
to Ext4 to improve performance?
This is entirely from memory, so it might be incorrect and not relevant
Hello,
'yum update' runs into the following error message.
Package libuser-devel-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.i386.rpm is not signed
regards
Olaf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
No. News reporting is about picking up and distilling the sentiment
of what's going on. The article has done that. It doesn't have to be
a complete factual research project with totally fair and balanced
chances for everyone to have their say. If the Devs had responded,
that would
Hi,
I just finished installing a CentOS 5.6 x86_64 system and the first
thing I wanted to do after the install is to apply the software patches.
But I get the following error when I try to run 'yum update':
Package libuser-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.x86_64.rpm is not signed
and yum update exits
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Hi,
I just finished installing a CentOS 5.6 x86_64 system and the first
thing I wanted to do after the install is to apply the
software patches.
But I get the following error when I try to run 'yum update':
Package
Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Hi,
I just finished installing a CentOS 5.6 x86_64 system and the first
thing I wanted to do after the install is to apply the
software patches.
But I get the following error when I try to run 'yum update':
Package
The attitudes against any user who has a question about releases
significantly undermines the project and is a slap in the face to
any user?
Or users who keep repeating again and again the same boring old stuff?
I think that we now all know what to expect and what not to expect from CentOS.
On 04/20/2011 04:53 PM, Andre Charbonneau wrote:
Hi,
I just finished installing a CentOS 5.6 x86_64 system and the first
thing I wanted to do after the install is to apply the software patches.
But I get the following error when I try to run 'yum update':
Package
Package libuser-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.x86_64.rpm is not signed
You could use --nogpgcheck but this is really weird that some packages
are not signed.
It may mean that the package is not from the trusted source, so you
should not use --nogpgcheck on a serious environment.
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
Package libuser-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.x86_64.rpm is not signed
You could use --nogpgcheck but this is really weird that some packages
are not signed.
It may mean that the package is not from the trusted source, so you
should not use --nogpgcheck on a serious
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:37:28PM -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Ummm, Cacti and I'm sure Opsview use rrdtool to generate there graphs.
In fact, my post was to ask for a more friendly tool as Cacti graphs
get un ruley.
'Unruly' graphs? Not sure what you mean. The data presentation
is
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Filipe Rosset rosset.fil...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/20/2011 04:53 PM, Andre Charbonneau wrote:
Hi,
I just finished installing a CentOS 5.6 x86_64 system and the first
thing I wanted to do after the install is to apply the software patches.
But I get the
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Filipe Rosset rosset.fil...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 04/20/2011 04:53 PM, Andre Charbonneau wrote:
Hi,
I just finished installing a CentOS 5.6 x86_64 system and the first
thing I wanted to do after the install is to apply the software
Another option is to exclude it on the command line
yum -x libuser update
/Marcel
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Andre Charbonneau
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 1:16 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re:
These packages are quite new (only a few hours old). They must have been
accidentally not signed. Skip them for the time being.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Marcel Beerli m.bee...@awid.com wrote:
Another option is to exclude it on the command line
yum -x libuser update
/Marcel
Ah, yes. One note is that adding a * ( libuser* ) is recommended
because libuser-devel is also not signed. :(
Akemi
On Wednesday, April 20, 2011 03:29:07 PM Ian Murray wrote:
My big beef has always been that the website and project name suggest one
thing
(i.e. enterprise ready), when the reality is quiet different.
[sigh]
CentOS is simply a community-available rebuild of the upstream Enterprise OS;
Tom H wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:06 AM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:27:16PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote:
Maybe having it said so publicly and be such a respected Linux community
member may help certain people wake up and smell the coffee.
Respected?
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 01:34:54PM -0400, Tom H wrote:
I don't think that I've ever read an article of his before but respect
isn't earned by praising a distribution or criticizing another.
I have read some of his articles in the past and I speak from the point
of knowledge of his past
On 4/13/2011 7:35 AM, Mailing List wrote:
Hi,
I have upgraded my Dell C151 to the latest 5.6. I have always used
ntp to sync this machine and then the rest of the machines in the
network would sync from it. Since the update I cannot keep the right
time on the machine. This is with /
Is there anything else relevant to add?
___
Yeah, please can someone fix the front-page to better reflect the distribution
for what it is, rather than the sales pitch that is there now. Not everyone has
read about it ad nausem on this list.
On Wednesday, April 20, 2011 05:51:46 PM Ian Murray wrote:
Is there anything else relevant to add?
Yeah, please can someone fix the front-page to better reflect the
distribution
for what it is, rather than the sales pitch that is there now. Not everyone
has
read about it ad nausem on
- Original Message
From: Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Wed, 20 April, 2011 21:32:35
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
On Wednesday, April 20, 2011 03:29:07 PM Ian Murray wrote:
My big beef has always been that the website and
On 04/20/11 2:51 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
Is there anything else relevant to add?
___
Yeah, please can someone fix the front-page to better reflect the distribution
for what it is, rather than the sales pitch that is there now. Not everyone
has
On 4/20/2011 5:45 PM, Rick Thomas wrote:
Have you tried installing the adjtimex package? If your system clock
is running reliably fast under the 5.6 kernel, maybe adjtimex can turn
that reliability into reliable time sync for you?
Rick
No I haven't, I will look into it. Thank you for
But to allude to
him as a respected industry member is greatly stretching things when
every article that mentions CentOS is disparaging and I can't recall any
article even ending on a positive note.
Try google: http://lwn.net/Articles/123934/
(For the record, I couldn't find any
- Original Message
From: John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Wed, 20 April, 2011 23:04:50
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
On 04/20/11 2:51 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
Is there anything else relevant to add?
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100
Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start
going public in about 8 - 12 hours ( this is [a-l]*.src.rpm ). The rest
I'll move in first thing on Wednesday morning.
Hmmm - it's 10 days on
On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100
Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start
going public in about 8 - 12 hours ( this is [a-l]*.src.rpm ). The rest
I'll move in first
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:26:51 -0700
Don Krause dkra...@optivus.com wrote:
On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100
Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
Also, the first batch of srpms is now on the seed machine, should start
going public
On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:26:51 -0700
Don Krause dkra...@optivus.com wrote:
On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Bob Hepple wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:58:43 +0100
Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
Also, the first batch of srpms is now on
On 21/04/11 5:26 AM, Olaf Mueller wrote:
Hello,
'yum update' runs into the following error message.
Package libuser-devel-0.54.7-2.1.el5_5.2.i386.rpm is not signed
I got this too, there's two ways around it:
1) Wait until the package is signed and then update.
2) Run: yum update
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:31:04PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote:
Seriously, just skip over my posts. I am not forcing you to read them. I'll
finish when I am good and ready... not when *you* decide.
How about I write you a check to just go away?
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:08 PM, John Beranek j...@redux.org.uk wrote:
That's not quite true, you can force files on a partition to be
re-created using extents with something like the below:
find /home -xdev -type f -print0 | xargs -0 chattr +e
find /home -xdev -type d -print0 | xargs -0
(someone) wrote:
Why does the website say something so different, then?
Seriously? Are people really this retarded?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ian Murray murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Seriously, just skip over my posts. I am not forcing you to read them. I'll
finish when I am good and ready... not when *you* decide.
I'm trying to figure out why someone who, apparently, hates the CentOS
distribution so
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Brian Mathis
It doesn't matter if you provide something for free, because it's
not free. Everyone who uses CentOS invests significant time and
energy into it.
How so? By installing it?
--
RonB -- Using CentOS 5.6
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Ian Murray murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
My big beef has always been that the website and project name suggest one
thing
(i.e. enterprise ready), when the reality is quiet different. I think Zonker
got
that one spot on. My suggest to the devs is to change the
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:18:21AM -0400, Brian Mathis wrote:
No. News reporting is about picking up and distilling the sentiment
of what's going on. The article has done that. It doesn't have to be
a complete factual research project with totally fair and balanced
chances for everyone to
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:29:07PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote:
I have it black and white in a private email from JH that he would never give
me
sufficient information to start a competing rebuild.
Information needed to rebuild is, and has been for quite some
time, in the
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:25:06PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote:
Try google: http://lwn.net/Articles/123934/
I've read the articles; I've no need to re-read them.
(For the record, I couldn't find any previous disparaging comments from
him... I
stopped at page 6)
You didn't look very hard.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 07:01:22PM -0500, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:31:04PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote:
Seriously, just skip over my posts. I am not forcing you to read them. I'll
finish when I am good and ready... not when *you* decide.
How about I write you a
On 4/21/11, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
The only sentiment picked up on was that of a loud, minuscule and
irrelevant fraction of the user base from this and the -devel mailing
lists. He went with the loudest group of whiners he could find.
Perhaps only a small handful keep
On 04/20/2011 09:18 AM, Brian Mathis wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Ian Murray murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Okay, maybe that was an assumption too far in regards to respect.
Perhaps not so one-sided if he had received an email reply from the devs
assuming he did indeed send one to
On 04/20/2011 02:29 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
I have it black and white in a private email from JH that he would never give
me
sufficient information to start a competing rebuild.
Why would anyone give another entity all the things required to replace
them? Red Hat does not give us nearly the
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:19:12PM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
Perhaps only a small handful keep whining about the situation.
However, the same idea that 95% of CentOS users never post to the ML
is also applicable to the complainer population. For every complainer,
there are probably 9
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin
centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps only a small handful keep whining about the situation.
However, the same idea that 95% of CentOS users never post to the ML
is also applicable to the complainer population. For every complainer,
there
On 04/20/2011 11:52 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/20/2011 02:29 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
I have it black and white in a private email from JH that he would never
give me
sufficient information to start a competing rebuild.
Why would anyone give another entity all the things required to
This begs the question:
Why are you still here? No, really. Why? You've nothing good to say.
Ever. Do you honestly think that the continue crap spewing off your
fingers endears you to the CentOS team? Do you think they care? Do you
think you're important to them? Let me disabuse you
On 4/20/11 8:53 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
The only sentiment picked up on was that of a loud, minuscule and
irrelevant fraction of the user base from this and the -devel mailing
lists. He went with the loudest group of whiners he could find.
If he had wanted to be really critical he would
On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 03:47 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/09/2011 12:04 PM, compdoc wrote:
A similar incident was reported during the QA. Look at the .xml file.
If it says type='raw', change it to type='qcow2' and restart libvirtd.
Would that fix the problem ?
Akemi
Thank you.
On 4/20/11 11:52 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I have it black and white in a private email from JH that he would never
give me
sufficient information to start a competing rebuild.
Why would anyone give another entity all the things required to replace
them?
Why? Because nearly all the
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 23:25 +0100, Ian Murray wrote:
But to allude to
him as a respected industry member is greatly stretching things when
every article that mentions CentOS is disparaging and I can't recall any
article even ending on a positive note.
Try google:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/20/11 11:52 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I have it black and white in a private email from JH that he would never
give me
sufficient information to start a competing rebuild.
Why would anyone give another entity
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Craig White craigwh...@azapple.com wrote:
I think that the apologist point of view for is pretty much worthless
because the intent is to stifle those who are genuinely concerned about
the timeliness now.
Yeah, genuinely concerned. And that concern is
Hello all,
Thank you very much for viewing the letter. This is Haowei (English
name: Cyrus Evans) from China, who is a professiona IT editor and English
interpretor. As I have gained more than 3 years' experience of localizatioin
work and so much experience opensource software (including
Am 20.04.11 18:01, schrieb Cyrus Evans:
I hope that anyone lead this work here could contact me?
Timothy: I think you two should talk :)
Cheers,
Ralph
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
Dear Haowei,
Thanks for your offer! :) I've added you to my gmail chat account to
further discuss the matter. In case you haven't yet done so, please
create a wiki account (see Section 3 in http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute )
Regards,
Timothy
___
-- 转发的消息 --
发件人：Cyrus Evans haowei...@gmail.com
日期：2011-4-21 上午8:38
主题：Re: [CentOS-docs] Application for joining Chinese (simplified) Team
收件人：Timothy Lee timothy.ty@gmail.com
Hi Timothy. I am currently keeping online on my another gmail for daily
work. Would you like to meet
Dear Ralph,
Can you give HaoweiLee (wiki account) permission to change all Chinese
pages. Thanks! He'll be working on the simplified Chinese translations. :)
Regards,
Timothy
On 04/21/2011 03:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Am 20.04.11 18:01, schrieb Cyrus Evans:
I hope that anyone lead
Hi Ralph,Timothy,
Besides giving me edit access on wiki,I would also want to apply for
translating centos website with Timothy as there is only English version. Would
you please also let me know how could we do that? Thank you vary much.
BTW,as I have talked with Timothy,we will keep working on
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory CEBA-2011:0450
xorg-x11 bugfix update for CentOS 4 i386 and x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0450.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing
to the mirrors:
i386:
xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.EL.68.i386.rpm
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0216
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0216.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
95a33840c4dfdafde335b03093c5c678
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0033
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0033.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
57ba15e655580a4ec5f4834252696c98
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0394 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0394.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
1048f9bb172cfbde8557d39828ae580f
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0172
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0172.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
a8fdf362618bf70866b33adb98edf180
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0394 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0394.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
6876b352f595b24bb20dfd4c86325dea
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0456
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0456.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
5f929a401b6af7ed81f5a205d59dc0d3
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0457
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0457.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
0184a9e755eb3b7711b837c9d6971b88
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0170 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0170.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
88a7e1acd85ddce6762e0e522555ff49
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0457
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0457.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
7cf77dcf53cfd03319dabc67f557b47b
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0388
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0388.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
a8d2a3f43d3f0e5c825eca9db830e07f
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0170 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0170.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
88a7e1acd85ddce6762e0e522555ff49
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0456
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0456.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
b1b260549c8275cbc546a55f27408603
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0033
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0033.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
ba0f8423b6557f8eea242acfad07c36b
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0172
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0172.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
c41f3d8277d5cd6dc378e276e0c57a88
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0216
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0216.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
f95e008550abd457c7e3ef2692c83f4e
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0142
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0142.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
9e50042207d4355c083c328e1fbb2321
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0142
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0142.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
90669f45e7e939841444095a6a9ce1f5
93 matches
Mail list logo
