-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:41:22 +0100, Always Learning wrote:
===
Thank you for all the hard dedicated work.
===
I am echoing Always Learning's appreciation. Thank you, Karanbir,
and all the other developers, QA personnel
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote:
To: centos@centos.org
From: Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-5.7 i386 and x86_64
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 00:33 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
We are pleased to announce the immediate
On 09/14/2011 06:59 AM, James A. Peltier wrote:
Yes, I did notice that, just wondered why. It seems more prone to breakage
(creating multiple symlinks vs one)
There are a couple of reasons. I wont go into all, but the 2 that stick
out the most for me are:
1) symlinking a step deeper means we
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 00:33 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5.7 for
i386 and x86_64 Architectures.
Thank you for all the hard dedicated work.
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
Any reason why 5 is not a symlink to 5.7 whereas 4 is a symlink to 4.8? Looks
like the same applies to 6!?!
- Original Message -
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-5.7
| for
| i386 and x86_64
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:24:48PM -0700, James A. Peltier wrote:
Any reason why 5 is not a symlink to 5.7 whereas 4 is a symlink to
4.8? Looks like the same applies to 6!?!
Because the contents of 5/ are symlinks to the 5.7/ directories!?!
On 09/13/11 9:40 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:24:48PM -0700, James A. Peltier wrote:
Any reason why 5 is not a symlink to 5.7 whereas 4 is a symlink to
4.8? Looks like the same applies to 6!?!
Because the contents of 5/ are symlinks to the 5.7/ directories!?!
- Original Message -
| On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 09:24:48PM -0700, James A. Peltier wrote:
| Any reason why 5 is not a symlink to 5.7 whereas 4 is a symlink to
| 4.8? Looks like the same applies to 6!?!
|
| Because the contents of 5/ are symlinks to the 5.7/ directories!?!
Yes, I did
8 matches
Mail list logo