On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.comwrote:
On 02/15/2013 02:27 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:44 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am setting up bind this time around (just rebuilt my test machine via
Kickstart) without chroot.
I
Yes. I had things a bit wrong here.
On 02/18/2013 12:46 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.comwrote:
On 02/15/2013 02:27 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:44 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am setting up bind this
On 02/15/2013 10:44 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am setting up bind this time around (just rebuilt my test machine via
Kickstart) without chroot.
I have a fair number of includes for named.conf; I have two views and
other odds and ends. My thoughts are to make a directory; /etc/named.d
to put
On 02/15/2013 12:31 PM, Jay Leafey wrote:
On 02/15/2013 10:44 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am setting up bind this time around (just rebuilt my test machine via
Kickstart) without chroot.
I have a fair number of includes for named.conf; I have two views and
other odds and ends. My
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:44 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am setting up bind this time around (just rebuilt my test machine via
Kickstart) without chroot.
I have a fair number of includes for named.conf; I have two views and
other odds and ends. My thoughts are to make a directory;
On 02/15/2013 02:27 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:44 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am setting up bind this time around (just rebuilt my test machine via
Kickstart) without chroot.
I have a fair number of includes for named.conf; I have two views and
other odds and
6 matches
Mail list logo