Hi Sam,
When the acting set changes order two chunks for the same object may co-exist
in the same placement group. The key should therefore also contain the chunk
number.
That's probably the most sensible comment I have so far. This document is
immensely useful (even in its current state)
On 01/08/2013 18:42, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Sam,
When the acting set changes order two chunks for the same object may co-exist
in the same placement group. The key should therefore also contain the chunk
number.
That's probably the most sensible comment I have so far. This document
are available ).
Cheers
On 01/08/2013 19:14, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 01/08/2013 18:42, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Sam,
When the acting set changes order two chunks for the same object may
co-exist in the same placement group. The key should therefore also contain
the chunk number.
That's
the position in the acting set and a history of osdmaps is kept, would
this be used when loading the pg from disk to make sure it matches the expected
chunk_id_t ?
Cheers
On 02/08/2013 09:39, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Sam,
I think I understand and paraphrasing you to make sure I do. We may save
Hi Sam,
* snapshots/clones:
I assume we don't want to support snapshots/clones for erasure coded PG.
If automatic tiering is implemented, snaphoting an object would be possible
when a replicated PG is tiered with an erasure coded PG. The erasure coded PG
would be used only for demoted
at 8:10 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Sam,
- coll_t needs to include a chunk_id_t.
https://github.com/athanatos/ceph/blob/2234bdf7fc30738363160d598ae8b4d6f75e1dd1/doc/dev/osd_internals/erasure_coding.rst#distinguished-acting-set-positions
That would be for sanity check ? Since
Hi Sam,
In case you don't get notified, I proposed a few changes to your erasure_coding
document. Basically links to the tickets you created last friday.
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/482
I also reworked the coding tasks of the blueprint
Hi Patrick,
I wrote a transcript of the Erasure coded storage backend (step 2) session at
:
http://wiki.ceph.com/01Planning/CDS/Emperor/Transcript_:_Erasure_coded_storage_backend_%28step_2%29
It may be helpfull to add it as a [transcript] link next to the [video] link.
Listening and reading
Hi Ceph,
During the Emperor summit this week, running and installing teuthology with a
minimum effort was discussed ( see http://youtu.be/hrQuYzyXvVg?t=1h21m49s and
http://pad.ceph.com/p/cds-teuthology ) I've installed it once, back in January
2013 and that was not too difficult but required a
Hi Sage,
During the discussions about continuous integration at the CDS this week (
http://youtu.be/cGosx5zD4FM?t=1h16m05s ) you mentionned that github was able to
keep track of the successive versions of a pull request commit, even in the
case of a rebase. I just tried the following:
a)
Hi,
Trying to use Ubuntu precise virtual machines as teuthology targets ( making
sure they have 2GB of RAM because ceph-test-dbg will not even install with 1GB
of RAM ;-) and installing the key with
wget -q -O- 'https://ceph.com/git/?p=ceph.git;a=blob_plain;f=keys/release.asc'
| sudo apt-key
/fedora/redhat systems.
Hi Dan,
This is Ubuntu and it does work with sudo. It probably is something about how
it's called rather than a system limit.
Cheers
On 08/08/2013 02:52 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi,
Trying to use Ubuntu precise virtual machines as teuthology targets ( making
sure
is the nofile
setting.
On 08/10/2013 01:34 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 10/08/2013 07:35, Dan Mick wrote:
IIRC we had to adjust settings in /etc/security to allow ulimit adjustment
of at least core:
sed -i 's/^#\*.*soft.*core.*0/\*softcore unlimited/g'
/etc/security
/teuthology/pull/27
Cheers
On 07/08/2013 19:25, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Ceph,
During the Emperor summit this week, running and installing teuthology with a
minimum effort was discussed ( see http://youtu.be/hrQuYzyXvVg?t=1h21m49s and
http://pad.ceph.com/p/cds-teuthology ) I've installed
Hi,
When running teuthology from a laptop with the configuration below and
./virtualenv/bin/teuthology --archive=/tmp/teuthology try.yaml
it then fails on
./virtualenv/bin/teuthology-coverage -v --html-output /tmp/html -o /tmp/lcov
--cov-tools-dir $(pwd)/coverage /tmp/teuthology
On 14/08/2013 09:38, Josh Durgin wrote:
On 08/13/2013 10:01 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi,
When running teuthology from a laptop with the configuration below and
./virtualenv/bin/teuthology --archive=/tmp/teuthology try.yaml
it then fails on
./virtualenv/bin/teuthology-coverage -v --html
Hi Sam,
IIRC, a few weeks ago you told me that
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/962b64a83037ff79855c5261325de0cd1541f582/src/osd/ReplicatedPG.cc#L4626
if (mode.wake) {
requeue_ops(mode.waiting);
for (listCond*::iterator p = mode.waiting_cond.begin(); p !=
mode.waiting_cond.end();
Hi,
Although
http://gitbuilder.sepia.ceph.com/gitbuilder-ceph-deb-precise-amd64-gcov/log.cgi?log=26707923b23cb55583a7d6b46ef6deb9591fd165
claims to build packages with coverage ( -gcov in the name ), I can't figure
out where it is nor how it is supposed to be used.
A hint would be much
I removed the code in a minimal way instead of removing the data member itself,
as you suggested.
https://github.com/dachary/ceph/commit/2f73eea0b8d7d4633d5887ba725d258ce81f8ac0
On 14/08/2013 12:17, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Sam,
IIRC, a few weeks ago you told me that
https://github.com
Hi Sam,
I've amended https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/414 with
https://github.com/dachary/ceph/commit/66e42d0ec29ffdd2edc225f4090a132a50d9665b#L0R4668
bool locked = is_locked();
if (!locked)
lock();
if (obc-ssc)
put_snapset_context(obc-ssc);
if (object_contexts.empty())
Hi Josh,
From https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/504 I see that your comments persisted
despite a rebase and show as
jdurgin discussed an outdated diff 8 hours ago
I would like to do the same but when I comment inline, it shows differently and
gets trashed by a rebase. I'm curious to learn
Thanks for the tip !
On 16/08/2013 09:01, Josh Durgin wrote:
On 08/15/2013 11:45 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Josh,
From https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/504 I see that your comments
persisted despite a rebase and show as
jdurgin discussed an outdated diff 8 hours ago
I would like
Hi Ceph,
It looks like Google has a github bot harvesting mails from repositories and
fishing for job applicants. I guess every committer got the exact same message
addressed to the mail(s) that show in the commits. There is nothing to be done
about it but it is worth mentioning, in public,
Hi Ceph,
I've implemented a draft of the Erasure Code plugin loader in the context of
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5878. It has a trivial unit test and an example
plugin. It would be great if someone could do a quick review. The general idea
is that the erasure code pool calls something
' }
If however, the chunk B is to be read but is missing it will be:
decode([2], { 1 = 'A', 3 = 'Z' })
= { 2 = 'B' }
Cheers
On 18/08/2013 19:34, Sage Weil wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Ceph,
I've implemented a draft of the Erasure Code plugin loader in the context
in a virtual machine
you need this emulation ...
Cheers Andreas.
From: Loic Dachary [l...@dachary.org]
Sent: 06 July 2013 22:47
To: Andreas Joachim Peters
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CEPH Erasure Encoding + OSD Scalability
Hi Andreas
Hi Sage,
This makes a lot more sense indeed. I updated the
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/5878 description accordingly.
ceph osd pool create poolname erasure-code-dir=/var/lib/ceph/erasure-code
erasure-code-plugin=jerasure erasure-code-m=10 erasure-code-k=3
erasure-code-algorithm=Reed-Solomon
On 19/08/2013 02:01, Sage Weil wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Sage,
Unless I misunderstood something ( which is still possible at this stage ;-)
decode() is used both for recovery of missing chunks and retrieval of the
original buffer. Decoding the M data chunks
Hi Sage,
I created erasure code : convenience functions to code / decode
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/6064 to implement the suggested functions.
Please let me know if this should be merged with another task.
Cheers
On 19/08/2013 17:06, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 19/08/2013 02:01, Sage Weil
Hi Ceph,
Yesterday I implemented a simple erasure code plugin that can sustain the loss
of a single chunk.
https://github.com/dachary/ceph/blob/wip-5878/src/osd/ErasureCodeExample.h
and it works as shown in the unit test
Hi James,
I'm working on adding jerasure as a plugin to Ceph. If I remember correctly the
next version of jerasure was scheduled to be released this month. Although
using jerasure-1.2 ( as found at
http://web.eecs.utk.edu/~plank/plank/papers/CS-08-627.html ) would be perfectly
fine, it may be
on jerasure-1.2A at
https://github.com/dachary/ceph/tree/wip-5879
https://github.com/dachary/ceph/commit/83845a66ae1cba63c122c0ef7658b97b474c2bd2
and I should be done by the end of next week.
Cheers
On 22/08/2013 18:27, Loic Dachary wrote:
James Plank reply:
My new GF library called GF-complete
Hi James,
I ran:
valgrind --tool=memcheck ./encoder F 2 2 reed_sol_van 8 0 310
compiled from jerasure-1.2A as found at
http://web.eecs.utk.edu/~plank/plank/papers/Jerasure-1.2A.tar
and compiled without modifications except for -g in the makefile to get the
error lines.
==22001== Use of
[cc'ing the mailing list for the record]
On 23/08/2013 18:53, James Plank wrote:
Hi Loic -- I see why valgrind is having issues with that, but it's safe -- I
have double-checked it.
Thanks, I'm reassured :-)
Tell you what, though -- you should change the +10 in line 425 of encoder.c
xattr or leveldb ) to store meta information instead
of creating a file format specifically designed for erasure code.
Cheers
Cheers Andreas.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
mailto:l...@dachary.org wrote:
On 22/08/2013 23:42, Andreas-Joachim
On 24/08/2013 21:41, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 24/08/2013 15:30, Andreas-Joachim Peters wrote:
Hi Loic,
I will start to review
Cool :-)
...maybe you can briefly explain few things beforehand:
1) the buffer management who allocates the output buffers for the
encoding
Hi Sage,
What is the temp collection used for ? Is there a thread / document I could
read to learn about it or a piece of code that is mainly about it ?
Cheers
On 29/08/2013 22:40, Sage Weil wrote:
Here's what I'm thinking:
Above the ObjectStore, we clear everything from temp on restart
Hi James,
The first version of the jerasure 1.2A plugin for Ceph is complete at
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/538#commits-pushed-763275e
This commit introduces the main part:
ErasureCodeJerasure: base class for jerasure ErasureCodeInterface
Hi,
I've explored the idea to use jenkins as a remplacement for the queue + archive
mechanism of teuthology. It turns out to be jenkins weak point. As Robert
Colins ( who recently wrote a HOWTO on how to replicated the CI infrastrcture
of OpenStack and is confident someone could do the same
-infra where all these tools are discussed and will
try to understand more about gear.
Cheers
On 06/09/2013 15:07, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi,
I've explored the idea to use jenkins as a remplacement for the queue +
archive mechanism of teuthology. It turns out to be jenkins weak point. As
Robert
life as a
developer easier? Thanks! Jim
--
On Aug 30, 2013, at 4:20 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi James,
The first version of the jerasure 1.2A plugin for Ceph is complete at
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/538#commits-pushed-763275e
This commit introduces the main part
: I want my own teuthology! ;-) It will be timeboxed to
one hour max and the communication channel ( mumble, phone conference ... )
will be announced on #ceph-devel half an hour before ( my nick is loicd ).
Cheers
On 13/08/2013 14:56, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Ceph,
Teuthology was successfully
Hi,
Ceph ( http://ceph.com/ ) relies on a custom implementation of Paxos to provide
exabyte scale distributed storage. Like most people recently exposed to Paxos,
I struggle to understand it ... but will keep studying until I get it :-) When
a friend mentionned Raft (
less than a ms ?
I suggest you start a separate thread for this, chances are your question will
not be noticed otherwise.
Cheers
Cheers, Andreas.
From: Loic Dachary [l...@dachary.org]
Sent: 25 August 2013 13:49
To: Andreas Joachim Peters
While reading the Raft paper today and remembering the Paxos implementation in
Ceph, I was amazed that it looked so similar. Thanks to your explanation I now
understand why ;-)
On 14/09/2013 18:48, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi
Hi David,
You're welcome to join the next teuthology meeting. It's going to happen
thursday 19th september (i.e. tomorrow from where I stand ) at 6pm paris time (
CEST ). The location ( mumble, irc ... ) will be announced at 5:30pm paris time
( CEST ) on irc.oftc.net#ceph-devel .
Cheers
On
Hi,
The meeting will use irc.oftc.net#ceph-devel and the mumble server at
mumble.upstream-university.org . You don't need any authorization to connect.
If you pick the same nickname as IRC you will minimize the risk of a name clash
:-)
Cheers
On 13/09/2013 13:44, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi
Hi,
Today 6pm paris time / CEST was the first teuthology meeting. The general idea
of these meetings is to get together developers using teuthology ( or willing
to use teuthology ) outside of Inktank and people using it inside inktank. The
goal is to help transition from an internal tool to
Hi Andreas,
Great work on these benchmarks ! It's definitely an incentive to improve as
much as possible. Could you push / send the scripts and sequence of operations
you've used ? I'll reproduce this locally while getting rid of the extra copy.
It would be useful to capture that into a script
of hint would be welcome :-)
Cheers
On 20/09/2013 17:36, Sage Weil wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Great work on these benchmarks ! It's definitely an incentive to improve as
much as possible. Could you push / send the scripts and sequence of
operations you've used
Hi Dan,
It will be exciting to see the next jerasure release integrate the
optimizations from gf-complete. It should happen before the end of the year :-)
Cheers
On 21/09/2013 07:22, Dan Mick wrote:
At SDC this week, Ethan Miller presented about some work he has done along
with others
Hi Andreas,
It's probably too soon to be smart about reducing the number of copies, but
you're right : this copy is not necessary. The following pull request gets rid
of it:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/615
Cheers
On 20/09/2013 18:49, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi,
This is a first attempt
encoding all blocks, then CRC32C on all blocks.
Cheers Andreas.
From: Loic Dachary [l...@dachary.org]
Sent: 21 September 2013 17:11
To: Andreas Joachim Peters
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CEPH Erasure Encoding + OSD Scalability
Hi Andreas,
Very inefficient implementation indeed :-) I've integrated your change in
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/619
Cheers
On 23/09/2013 01:00, Andreas Joachim Peters wrote:
alignment = k*w*packetsize*sizeof(int);
in_length += (alignment - (in_length%alignment);
--
Loïc
Hi,
Unless I'm mistaken, ceph_crc32() is currently used in master via the crc32c()
method of bufferlist to:
* encode_with_checksum/decode_with_checksum a PGLog entry
* Message::decode_message/Message::encode_message a message via calc_*_crc
*
Hi Eric Patrick,
Yesterday morning Eric suggested that organizing a ceph user meetup would be
great and proposed his help to make it happen. Although I'd be very happy to
attend a france based meetup, it may make sense to also organize a Europe wide
meetup. For instance it would be great to
Hi Andreas,
It looks like this code would be useful as a standalone program instead of
being integrated within unit tests. There are a few support program of that
kind. The unit tests are probably not the best place for benchmarks. What do
you think ?
Cheers
Note: got the updated file ;-)
does not see the
benefit ( yet ;-)
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Eric Patrick,
Yesterday morning Eric suggested that organizing a ceph user meetup would be
great and proposed his help to make it happen. Although I'd be very happy to
attend
On 25/09/2013 20:33, Andreas Joachim Peters wrote: Yes, sure. I actually
thought the same in the meanwhile ... I have some questions:
Q: Can/should it stay in the framework of google test's or you would prefer
just a plain executable ?
A plain executable would make sense. An simple
Hi,
Today 8pm paris time / CEST was the second teuthology meeting. The general idea
of these meetings is to get together developers using teuthology ( or willing
to use teuthology ) outside of Inktank and people using it inside inktank. The
goal is to help transition from an internal tool to
as to tell me what is confusing in the
description ?
Cheers Andreas.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
mailto:l...@dachary.org wrote:
On 25/09/2013 20:33, Andreas Joachim Peters wrote: Yes, sure. I actually
thought the same in the meanwhile
will change an
may require a different strategy.
Cheers
Thanks Andreas.
From: Loic Dachary [l...@dachary.org]
Sent: 26 September 2013 21:18
To: Andreas Joachim Peters
Cc: Ceph Development
Subject: Re: CEPH Erasure Encoding + OSD Scalability
-
De: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
À: Dan van der Ster d...@vanderster.com
Cc: Patrick McGarry patr...@inktank.com, ERIC MOURGAYA VIRAPATRIN
eric.mourgaya-virapat...@arkea.com, Ceph Development
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 25 Septembre 2013 17:27:37
Objet: Re: Ceph users
Hi David,
In
int FileStore::lfn_open(coll_t cid,
const ghobject_t oid,
bool create,
FDRef *outfd,
IndexedPath *path,
Index *index)
{
assert(get_allow_sharded_objects() ||
.
From: Loic Dachary [l...@dachary.org]
Sent: 27 September 2013 11:40
To: Andreas Joachim Peters
Cc: Ceph Development
Subject: Re: CEPH Erasure Encoding + OSD Scalability
On 26/09/2013 23:49, Andreas Joachim Peters wrote: Sure,
this text is clear
Hi Ross Patrick,
During tonight talk about teuthology I suggested that, if you think it's
appropriate, you could say a word during your talk in London next week.
Although teuthology is still rough around the edges, it's definitely useable
and useful, even outside inktank. If you could invite
Hi,
Today 8pm paris time / CEST was the thrid teuthology meeting. The general idea
of these meetings is to get together developers using teuthology ( or willing
to use teuthology ) outside of Inktank and people using it inside inktank. The
goal is to help transition from an internal tool to
Hi Ceph,
Binding ceph to cinder and glance using puppet requires three steps:
* Deploy ceph ( with ceph-deploy, puppet, chef ... )
* Follow the ceph documentation instructions ( valid for both cinder and glance
)
http://ceph.com/docs/next/rbd/rbd-openstack/
* Part of the above instructions
- 75009 Paris
Web : www.enovance.com - Twitter : @enovance
On October 8, 2013 at 4:18:00 PM, Loic Dachary (l...@dachary.org) wrote:
Hi Ceph,
Binding ceph to cinder and glance using puppet requires three steps:
* Deploy ceph ( with ceph-deploy, puppet, chef ... )
* Follow the ceph
://framadate.org/studs.php?sondage=iyawpvvq76omrh5p
Greetings from the London Ceph days : it has been fantastic :-)
http://cephdaylondon.eventbrite.com/
Cheers
On 03/10/2013 20:00, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi,
Today 8pm paris time / CEST was the thrid teuthology meeting. The general
idea
and recorded that I can attend any of the proposed times.
I'm so glad it happened despite our ( Christophe and myself ) failure to attend
:-D
I'll wait 48h before announcing the next meeting.
Cheers
Thanks,
Mike Dawson
Co-Founder, Cloudapt LLC
On 10/9/2013 2:09 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
On 08/10/2013 15:47, Sébastien Han wrote:
Hi Loïc,
Actually they are some steps that might be automated such as:
* set the virsh secret
* create both glance and cinder pools
Where do you think it might already
On 08/10/2013 16:20, Don Talton (dotalton) wrote: Hi Loic,
We utilize stackforge's puppet modules to do our heavy lifting, including
p-openstack, p-cinder, p-glance. There are dependency chains so that services
will be restarted after configuration changes are made. Since many of our
On 09/10/2013 22:46, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 08/10/2013 16:20, Don Talton (dotalton) wrote: Hi Loic,
We utilize stackforge's puppet modules to do our heavy lifting, including
p-openstack, p-cinder, p-glance. There are dependency chains so that
services will be restarted after
:59, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 09/10/2013 20:25, Mike Dawson wrote: Loic,
Zack, Tamil, and I were on the call. I started experimenting with Teuthology
this week, so most of the meeting covered topics around attempting to gather
and analyze performance metrics associated with Teuthology test
Hi Ceph,
What about we discuss the state of Ceph deployment in the context of puppet and
/ or OpenStack ? If nothing else, it will be a good opportunity for all people
actively working in this area to touch base. The proposed agenda is to list and
possibly clarify the existing methods and
Hi James,
Please meet François Helt who is best know for his work on image processing in
the movie industry. It has been suggested that there may be interesting
intersections between Homomorphism and Erasure Coding. Do you have an opinion
on this topic ? It is entirely possible that my
US/Canada: +1.866.432.9903
United Kingdom: +44.20.8824.0117 India: +91.80.4350. Germany:
+49.619.6773.9002 Japan: +81.3.5763.9394 China: +86.10.8515.5666
Room code: 208324756
Access code: 208324756
On 11/10/2013 16:47, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi Ceph,
What about we discuss the state of Ceph
and probably Salt,
Ansible etc. I've not done any research in this area though. Don't you think it
deserves a separate discussion ?
Cheers
On 11 October 2013 16:18, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
mailto:l...@dachary.org wrote:
Someone kindly pointed out that I did not mention the day
Hi,
Today I wrote a script ( http://dachary.org/wp-uploads/2013/10/micro-osd.txt )
to quickly configure and spawn a ceph cluster for test purposes ( under 5
seconds ). The details are explained at http://dachary.org/?p=2374 . It could
be useful for the ceph related work done with
Hi Dan,
I'm looking for the path of least resistance to add rbd support to
https://github.com/CiscoSystems/openstack-installer/ Being unfamiliar with the
data oriented approach it would be great to get your advice on the following.
* assume ceph has already been installed without cephx which
On 14/10/2013 08:31, Dan Bode wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
mailto:l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Dan,
I'm looking for the path of least resistance to add rbd support to
https://github.com/CiscoSystems/openstack-installer/ Being
On 14/10/2013 19:34, Dan Bode wrote:
On 14/10/2013 08:31, Dan Bode wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
mailto:l...@dachary.org mailto:l...@dachary.org
mailto:l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Dan,
I'm looking
code: 208324756
Cheers
On 11/10/2013 17:18, Loic Dachary wrote:
Someone kindly pointed out that I did not mention the day :-) Here are the
complete informations:
Tuesday 15th October 2013
16:30-17:00 UTC / 12:30-13:00 US-Eastern / 10:30-11:00 US-Mountain
09:30-10:00 US-Pacific / 18:30-19
Hi Ceph,
How about creating
https://github.com/ceph/puppet-ceph
to federate the development efforts for a puppet module exclusively focused on
deploying / maintaining a Ceph cluster ? It looks like we are at a point in
time where the fragmentation of the work created a desire for a central
-and-simplify
If you have any questions about the code, ask me since I didn't update
the documentation to reflect the new code yet.
Regards,
Danny
Am 15.10.2013 17:39, schrieb Loic Dachary:
Hi,
The call was rescheduled one hour later. It is now:
17:30-18:00 UTC / 13:30-14:00 US-Eastern
Hi Lluís,
David Zafman and Samuel Just are working to re-architecture the core of Ceph so
that and ErasureCodedBackend can be implemented. You can browse their commits
to see what they are up to. The transcript of the last CDS summit will also
give you a general view of the direction in which
Hi,
Wednesday 16th, Ocotber 2013 8pm paris time / CEST was the fifth teuthology
meeting. The general idea of these meetings is to get together developers using
teuthology ( or willing to use teuthology ) outside of Inktank and people using
it inside inktank. The goal is to help transition from
Hi,
It would be great if we could discuss Ceph deployment and share our experience
accross configuration tools. The work in progress for the new puppet module (
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Puppet-openstack/ceph-blueprint ) shows that
it's worth discussing to find simple solutions. For
Hi Ceph,
In the context of the ceph puppet module (
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Puppet-openstack/ceph-blueprint ) I tried to
think about what should be provided to deal with disks / OSDs when they are
removed or moved around.
Here is a possible scenario:
* Machine A dies and contains OSD
it will continue working
properly even if moved to a different box.
Cool.
That makes it real simple from the point of view of tools like puppet :-)
Cheers
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Ceph,
In the context of the ceph puppet module (
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Puppet-openstack/ceph-blueprint ) I tried to
think about what
On 22/10/2013 19:26, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
On 21/10/2013 18:49, Gregory Farnum wrote:
I'm not quite sure what questions you're actually asking here...
In general, the OSD is not removed from the system without explicit
:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
On 21/10/2013 18:49, Gregory Farnum wrote:
I'm not quite sure what questions you're actually asking here...
In general, the OSD is not removed from the system without explicit
admin intervention. When it is removed, all
had in the past
for those of us in North America. Does that still work for the rest of you?
Cheers,
Mike
On 10/24/2013 6:30 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi,
Wednesday 23th, Ocotber 2013 8pm paris time / CEST was the sixth teuthology
meeting. The general idea of these meetings is to get
-solutions.com
To: James Plank pl...@cs.utk.edu
CC: Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org
Hello
a quick reaction.
The papers are interesting indeed.
Let me do a rough summary of what I understand and the application requirements
I foresee
A Client C is entrusting precious and large data to a Server S
://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/v0.61.9/src/upstart/ceph-osd.conf#L29 ) ?
Cheers
On 23/10/2013 15:45, Loic Dachary wrote:
Hi,
As a conclusion to this thread and also because I realized that most people
are unaware of the level of automation provided by ceph / udev, I just posted
a quick summary
Hi Patrick,
I wish Inktank was able to base its strategy and income on Free Software. Like
RedHat does, for instance. In addition, as long as Inktank employs the majority
of Ceph developers, publishing Calamari as a proprietary software is a conflict
of interest. Should someone from the
On 02/11/2013 08:03, Sage Weil wrote:
Hi!
On Sat, 2 Nov 2013, Xing Lin wrote:
Free allocated memory before return because of NULL input
Signed-off-by: Xing Lin xing...@cs.utah.edu
---
src/osd/ErasureCodePluginJerasure/jerasure.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1
Hi,
Wednesday 30th, Ocotber 2013 8pm paris time / CEST was the seventh teuthology
meeting (with some DST confusion on my part). The general idea of these
meetings is to get together developers using teuthology ( or willing to use
teuthology ) outside of Inktank and people using it inside
1 - 100 of 1157 matches
Mail list logo
