That looks like it should work...
window.open('url', 'windowName', 'properties');
The only thing I noticed is the name is pretty long, theDetailWindow,
not sure if it matters but you could try using a shorter name.
Other then that I noticed you have the href set in the link. When I use
a link
Well with CFCONTENT you could use it to send a file to a user, which
would in turn popup a save as box for them to save a file to a certain
location. Something like...
cfsetting enablecfoutputonly=yes
cfcontent file=whatever.txt type=application/ms-download
But there is no way to manipulate
What I have used is the MS Security Took Kit for NT and 2000 server to lock
them down. MS sales people have been giving them out at seminars,
conventions, etc. here in Italy so I have never looked on the web (must be
on the security pages of MS).
dott. John Forrester
Systems e Networking
Hi everyone,
I have two CF sites, one built using CF4.5 the other using CF5. We need to put both
on a laptop for demo purposes. Is it possible to have CF4.5 and 5 on the same machine
or will 5 overwrite 4.5. If so can 4.5 be installed over 5 at a later date.
I know the the site built using
Morning,
I have two CF sites, one built using CF4.5 the other using CF5. We need
to put both on a laptop for demo purposes. Is it possible to have CF4.5 and
5 on the same machine or will 5 overwrite 4.5. If so can 4.5 be installed
over 5 at a later date.
I know the the site built using
Hi guys,
I seem to remember a udf that would pick out a link in a block of text, and
make it a display it on a page as a clickable hyperlink within that text.
Or am I just imagining it? Anyway a cursory search of CFlib turns up
nothing, so can any of you guys help?
Cheers
Will
You can find a custom tag that does it in the components section of
www.coderbox.com
@llan
-Original Message-
From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 12:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: udf to recognise url in a block of text or do i need a regex?
Hi guys,
is it possible i run the SQL statement below in
cfquery?
grant all privileges on table1 to user1
i get an error when i do so.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
Whats the best way to delete files and then the directory they are within?
Is there some sort of recursive delete on one the CF functions?
__
Why Share?
Dedicated Win 2000 Server · PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB
Make sure the user for the connection has the right permissions and that the Restrict
SQL Operations to checkboxes for the datasource in the CF administrator are all
unchecked
Pascal
-Original Message-
From: Mak Wing Lok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: dinsdag 12 maart 2002 12:30
To:
Hi Phil
There is a Customtag cf_directory on the developers exchange that will do it.
If you can't find it, mail me off list. I will send it to you.
Pascal
-Original Message-
From: phumes1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: dinsdag 12 maart 2002 12:48
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Deleteing
Raymond Camden has a nice collection of udfs etc on http://www.cflib.org
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: Will Swain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:28 AM
Subject: udf to recognise url in a block of text or do i need a regex?
Hi guys,
is it possible i run the SQL statement below in
cfquery?
grant all privileges on table1 to user1
i get an error when i do so.
You should be able to.
What's the error you get?
Stephen
__
Get Your Own Dedicated
I've never used fusebox, so I'm wondering if it is worth taking the time to
learn. What are the advantages or disadvantages to it? Are there any good
books/webpages on learning it? What additional stuff do I need on my
server to be able to use it?
Thanks,
T
thanks allan, thats great.
Cheers
Will
-Original Message-
From: Allan Pichler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 March 2002 11:33
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: udf to recognise url in a block of text or do i need a
regex?
You can find a custom tag that does it in the components section
Raymond Camden has a nice collection of udfs etc on http://www.cflib.org
[snip]
Or am I just imagining it? Anyway a cursory search of CFlib turns up
nothing, so can any of you guys help?
Of course I really should take some aspirin for this headache and read
emails more thoroughly too.
Great...thanks
At 12:50 PM 3/12/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Phil
There is a Customtag cf_directory on the developers exchange that will
do it.
If you can't find it, mail me off list. I will send it to you.
Pascal
-Original Message-
From: phumes1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
lolno worries steve, take a pill man!!!
I have altered the custom tag from coderbox slightly, so that the links open
in new windows, and it works a treat. I'm sure it would be easy enough to
convert to a UDF if needed.
Cheers
Will
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Moretti
Can open, worms all over the floor!
IMHO - Fusebox is a methodology with a lot of dedicated followers - if you
come to CF from a coders background it's very rare for you to adopt
fusebox (unless you are first taught this way), however if you come to CF
from a programmers background you will take
I just tried it out and it works great except for one thing. I was hoping
the tag would also allow me to delete all the files
within a directory but leave the directory itself. This custom tag seems to
delete all the files and directory. I do need this option but also require
the option to
Nevermind...found one.
At 07:28 AM 3/12/2002 -0500, you wrote:
I just tried it out and it works great except for one thing. I was hoping
the tag would also allow me to delete all the files
within a directory but leave the directory itself. This custom tag seems to
delete all the files and
Shawn,
I don't have an answer but am anxiously awaiting one.
I have a case where in order to get some records into our SQL database I
execute a SP to enter a blank record and then call several SP's to update
different fields in the record with values. I need to wrap this in a
cftransaction
if it is possible, can anyone tell me how to
successfully upload a wordperfect document using cffile?
thanks,
phillip
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe:
Just wanting to know.
IMHO - Fusebox is a methodology with a lot of dedicated followers - if
you
come to CF from a coders background it's very rare for you to adopt
fusebox (unless you are first taught this way), however if you come to
CF
from a programmers background you will take to fusebox
That's my point. That defeats the purpose behind the intent of the
original poster.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 12:48 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFFILE - on server only?
Well with CFCONTENT you could use it to send a
I think the insinuation is that a coder is an HTML- or web-programmer-type
(ASP, PHP, etc.) without OO experience, whereas a programmer is someone
with an OO background.
Just my take on it, I'll reserve my opinion of just how asinine that
statement is.
Pete
- Original Message -
From:
(Shouldn't this be on CF-Community?)
In my world the distinction is not OO based... Object Oriented is a more
advanced programming technique, but you have to remember those who
program in non-Object capable languages (and there are a lot of them).
There were people referred to as Programmers
Can open, worms all over the floor!
IMHO - Fusebox is a methodology with a lot of dedicated followers - if you
come to CF from a coders background it's very rare for you to adopt
fusebox (unless you are first taught this way), however if you come to CF
from a programmers background you will take
I could use some clarification on SSL.
If I create a link with url parameters, are the url parameters SSL
encrypted?
ex: https://www.domain.com/xyz.cfm?x=1234y=5678
I was under the impression that the urls params generated from a link were
not SSL encrypted.
TIA,
Duane
At 09:40 AM 3/12/2002 -0500, you wrote:
(Shouldn't this be on CF-Community?)
In my world the distinction is not OO based... Object Oriented is a more
advanced programming technique, but you have to remember those who
program in non-Object capable languages (and there are a lot of them).
There
Hi,
I want to be able to check to see if any directories exist with c:\temp and
if so, redirect the output
to different templates.
What am I doing wrong below?
cfdirectory directory=c:\test name=MyList
cfif MyListr.name IS . or MyList.name IS ..
cfif MyList.name IS
Duane Boudreau wrote:
I could use some clarification on SSL.
If I create a link with url parameters, are the url parameters SSL
encrypted?
Everything you send over a HTTPS connection is encrypted. This includes
URL parameters.
Jochem
Very well said.
One more Pro:
- It also faclitate developers to work in team. e.g. I will take care of
the login circuit and you will take care of the ShoppingCart circuit.
Yet one more Con:
- FB is nasty if your clients need reporting on their website. Since FB
always goes thru index.cfm
To take away your con, we use SES urls (search engine safe). Erik V made a
tag that changes a url from
index.cfm?fuseaciont=something.somethinghere=there to
index.cfm/fuseaction/something.something/here/there/index.html . Not only
will this help with the crappy search engines that aren't google,
correct, if you are referring to them being visible to the person following the links.
however, they are sent through an encrypted pipe, so those sniffing the network see
the encrypted version.
christopher olive
cto, vp of web development, vp it security
atnet solutions, inc.
410.931.4092
Check out your cfif. You are testing if MyListr.name IS . or MyList.name
IS .. and then if that is true, you are testing if MyList.name IS ,
which CANNOT be true, since you know that MyListr.name IS . or MyList.name
IS ..
Your original email seems to have a typo. Do you want to see if there
Based on my understanding, OO is just as old as
Procedural Programming.
Oh, I don't think so. While they've both been around for quite a while,
procedural programming still predates OO by decades, I'd guess. It's worth
noting that, from a CS point of view (and I'm not a CS grad, so you'll
There's also an ISAPI filter that does this which we use:
http://www.pstruh.cz/help/urlrepl/library.htm
-Original Message-
From: Robert Everland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 March 2002 15:28
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Fusebox pros and cons
To take away your con, we use
There were people referred to as Programmers long before the concept of
Object Oriented development came along.
Actually, I think you mean long before the concept of Object Oriented
programming was put into practice. Based on my understanding, OO is just
as old as Procedural
Subject: OT: What's the difference between a coder and
a programmer??
Just wanting to know.
Coder is a slang term for programmer, that's all. There's no difference. I
think that the original poster was using the slang term to imply sloppyness,
or lack of precision.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig
With webtrends, i've never had trouble with urls. For instance,
http://www.sitename.com/index.cfm?page=home; is counted separate from
http://www.sitename.com/index.cfm?page=news; The only problem is that you can't tell
(from webtrends) how popular certain applications are if you use url
Bien merci/Thank you very much!
Duane
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Olive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 10:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SSL Question
correct, if you are referring to them being visible to the person following
the links. however,
Coder/Programmer is synonymous. There is no difference - they both write
code.
The difference probably should be designer vs. coder/programmer, where
designers can cope with flat stuff, but generally have no idea how to
structure applications. Writing HTML is hardly coding - its only a complex
I was under the impression that OO methodology is relatively new
(mid-late 80s) and became very popular when Bjorn Strausstroup (sp?)
came out with his C for Classes (better known as C++)
- Matt Small
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March
Because of this reason I decided not to go with it. Many clients have
standard Web Stats packages already installed.
- Original Message -
From: Donny Ng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 10:27 AM
Subject: RE: Fusebox pros and cons
Very well
At 10:36 AM 3/12/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Check out your cfif. You are testing if MyListr.name IS . or MyList.name
IS .. and then if that is true, you are testing if MyList.name IS ,
which CANNOT be true, since you know that MyListr.name IS . or MyList.name
IS ..
Your original email seems to have
I want to take a query output, format it as HTML page and save it as a downloadable
HTML document. I don't need to display the page in the browser window.
1) Would CFSilent hide the HTML from view?
2) How would I create the HTML file, in other words:
There's a $50 fusebox log tool available from www.secretagents.com for
online reporting...basic, but its pretty powerful,
Jb.
-Original Message-
From: Frank Mamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 March 2002 15:48
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Fusebox pros and cons
Because of
Use cfhttp to send the page the vars and run the page and then use cffile to
create a file with the generated output.
HTH
Clint
-Original Message-
From: Mark Leder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Creating a file from a web page
I
I don't mean to be a fusebox shil here, but...
One advantage of FB is that all URL, FORM and ATTRUBUTE scoped vars are converted to
attributes scope. So, you could have a url/stats safe page such as:
www.mysite.com/shop/viewitem.cfm which contains only the code:
cf_ShoppingApp
I would create the page in a variable as if it were an html page on its
own and then use cffile to store the variable in a file. Place a link
to it on the page that the user sees and inform them to
right-click-save target as-... or whatever works in their case.
- Matt Small
-Original
At 10:39 AM 3/12/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Based on my understanding, OO is just as old as
Procedural Programming.
Oh, I don't think so. While they've both been around for quite a while,
procedural programming still predates OO by decades, I'd guess.
Anyone know when the first Procedural
You can see my other post. First OO language was in the early 70s;
however I can't find anything statement when OO concepts came into play.
At 10:52 AM 3/12/2002 -0500, you wrote:
I was under the impression that OO methodology is relatively new
(mid-late 80s) and became very popular when
Coder = Someone who can work predominately with Mark Up languages
Programmer = Someone who can work predominately with lower level languages
Just terms we use here when invoicing clients.
J
-Original Message-
From: Matthew R. Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12,
I agree ( and would add, based on another post that I already deleted )
that...
Working in a team is not unique to fusebox. I can still work with other
programmers in a team, even if I do not code with fusebox.
I would argue to the below that converting URL / FORM / ATTRIBUTE
Try this
cfdirectory action=LIST directory=#dir# name=qName sort=type ASC, name DESC
cfset bDir = 0
cfloop query=qName
cfif qName.type IS dir AND NOT(ListFind(.,..,qName.name))
cfset bDir = 1
cfbreak
cfelseif qName.type IS file
cfbreak
/cfif
/cfloop
cfif bDir
One advantage of FB is that all URL, FORM and ATTRUBUTE
scoped vars are converted to attributes scope.
I'm not so sure that's an advantage. It might be useful in places, but when
I'm writing a program, I usually want to know where the inputs for that
program come from.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig
I'm trying to write my first Cold Fusion Stored Procedure.
And I have run into a problem. Can someone help explain
what this error means: NULL Interface Ptr? I've looked in
the online help documentation, and on Macromedia/Allair's
web site and there is absolutely no reference to this error,
Currently in the ColdFusion Administrator you can tell
it to purge data for clients that remain unvisited for
X number of days. Is it possible to go from days to
hours, or even possibly minutes?
To the best of my knowledge, no, you can't do that. However, you can
disconnect that data from
If anyone's got this UDF and is using the optional parameter, please
download the new version which fixes a bug in the Mastercard number
validation.
Thanks to Troy Pullis for spotting it.
Nick
__
Why Share?
Dedicated Win
provider=SQLOLEDB
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 March 2002 16:15
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Stored Procedure Help
I'm trying to write my first Cold Fusion Stored Procedure.
And I have run into a problem. Can someone help explain
what this
Mark,
I do a similar thing all the time. What you do is put your HTML output into
a variable, then you write the contents of the variable to a file.
CFSET temp =
CFOUTPUT QUERY=myQuery
CFSET temp = ListAppend(temp, HTMLHEADTITLE#myPageTitle#/TITLE,
^)
CFSET temp = ListAppend(temp,
It works great.
Thanks Pascal
At 05:14 PM 3/12/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Try this
cfdirectory action=LIST directory=#dir# name=qName sort=type ASC,
name DESC
cfset bDir = 0
cfloop query=qName
cfif qName.type IS dir AND NOT(ListFind(.,..,qName.name))
cfset bDir = 1
cfbreak
True, but it's not as complete as standard packages like LiveStats for
example.
There's no doubt about the advantages, but IMHO the abstraction causes other
issues.
- Original Message -
From: John Beynon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 10:48
I would have to say that it would be an advantage when desigining
sub-applications or modules that can be called as custom tags. As far as
knowing where inputs come from, that would be a documentation issue. Just
my $.02 worth.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL
I know that some people are going to disagree with me.. but I hate using the
storedproc tag.
Try running this through cfquery and see what happens...
cfquery name=YestPayments datasource=Paragon
execute sp_ktChgsPmtsByDate sdate='#sdate#',Edate='#edate#'
/cfquery
My 2cents
Clint
CFSET
There haven't really been too many innovations in the core concepts of
programming for a very long time.
I guess this depends on your definition of the core concepts of
programming. Sure nothing has changed; we still set variables do
conditionals and throw in some loops...it's simple. But the
I'm not so sure that's an advantage. It might be useful in
places, but when
I'm writing a program, I usually want to know where the
inputs for that
program come from.
The new fusedocs really are a nice touch to the current methodology - they
specifically map out what's coming in and
I know that some people are going to disagree with me.. but I
hate using the
storedproc tag.
well, both ways of calling SPs have their pros and cons
with cfstoredproc you can retrieve multiple recordsets - a really useful
way of encapsulating your SQL queries and maintaining efficiency
At 10:53 AM 3/12/2002 -0500, you wrote:
There haven't really been too many innovations in the core concepts of
programming for a very long time.
I guess this depends on your definition of the core concepts of
programming. Sure nothing has changed; we still set variables do
conditionals and
What about COLDFUSION being one,
surely its a step in the direction of black box programming,
If a tagged language could replace Javascript would it be an innovation?
For beginners of JavaScript yes,
because once they tackled a traditional programming language after learning
it,
they would see
In my experience, this would be better done in a single stored procedure
call (which would then call any other required stored procs). SQL Server
supports nested transactions, so each of your 'child' stored procs can also
use transactions if required.
If you are writing this from scratch, put
Hear hear - reminds me of a conversation I had with a Java programmer who
told me that JSP conveniently converted all URL and FORM variables to the
same request scope. Which would pretty much break a lot of my form
programming g. I like being able to specify scopes and keep items
logically
CF isn't a new way or concept of developing applications. Not like the
encapsulation and inheritance properties of OO. For me the most recent new
step was Java and the way the code is executed by JVM's across multi
providers. the other was the introduction of OLEDB as a datasource
connectivity
I'm not so sure that's an advantage. It might be useful
in places, but when I'm writing a program, I usually
want to know where the inputs for that program come from.
The new fusedocs really are a nice touch to the current
methodology - they specifically map out what's coming in
Coder = Someone who can work predominately with Mark Up languages
coder != someone who can work with markup languages
That's not coding. It's authoring, or formatting. I worked with markup
languages (primarily as a technical writer) long before HTML became popular,
and I was never a coder or a
... from a CS point of view (and I'm not a CS grad, so
you'll have to take this with a grain of salt) there
haven't really been too many innovations in the core
concepts of programming for a very long time.
I guess this depends on your definition of the core concepts
of
I'm late in this thread as always (PST time and Starbucks Coffee that's my
excuse). The greatest advantage of Fusebox from my experience is that it
enables non ColdFusion savvy developers and designers to get up to speed
quickly in CF. It gives them a structured set of reference points, it is
At 04:58 PM 3/12/2002 +, you wrote:
CF isn't a new way or concept of developing applications. Not like the
encapsulation and inheritance properties of OO. For me the most recent new
step was Java and the way the code is executed by JVM's across multi
providers.
I agree with you on
Can I ask for examples?
XML.
It doesn't change programming, but it sure changes the landscape.
btw my guess at first OO language would be Simula (1967)
Nick
__
Why Share?
Dedicated Win 2000 Server · PIII 800 / 256 MB
I like being able to specify scopes and keep
items logically separated.
Fusebox doesn't destroy the original scope or alter it in any way, it just
makes the data available in the attributes scope should you have a desire to
reference it that way.
Ken
At 09:11 AM 3/12/2002 -0800, you wrote:
I'm late in this thread as always (PST time and Starbucks Coffee that's my
excuse). The greatest advantage of Fusebox from my experience is that it
enables non ColdFusion savvy developers and designers to get up to speed
quickly in CF. It gives them a
Sorry for the off topic post.
Does anyone know where I can find a definitive description of the
differences (i.e. what will and won't work / html display differences
etc...) between IE 5+ and Netscape 4.7 +
TIA
Ryan Edgar
Certified Coldfusion 5 Developer
www.biznet-solutions.com
Is it just me or does it looks like the debug output for CF show the
templates in alphabetical order instead of by execution sequence? I am
talking about the output below Execution Time.
Is there a way to change this?
Dave
__
You still get your FORM and URL vars with Fusebox. If you don't want to read
them from the attributtes scope, you don't have to!
- Original Message -
From: Mark A. Kruger - CFG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hear hear - reminds me of a conversation I had with a Java programmer who
told me that JSP
XML is an implementation of SGML, which has been around for decades.
- Original Message -
From: Nick de Voil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 10:17 am
Subject: Re: OT: OO vs procedural (was: What's the difference...)
Can I ask for examples?
XML.
It doesn't
One of the original ideas for C++ was to have a virtual machine as
well. So that concept is very old as well.
Face it, us computer people are terribly uncreative :)
- Original Message -
From: Andy Ewings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:58 am
Subject: RE: OT: OO vs
Hope this helps!
http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/reference/browser_chart/
Paul Giesenhagen
QuillDesign
http://www.quilldesign.com
SiteDirector - Commerce Builder v2.0
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Edgar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002
Friends...
I am as shocked as you are at the speed of the Developer Exchange and am
painfully aware of the effects that the new speed have had in your daily work.
I wanted to let you know that we were not going to take this lying down.
I have formulated a plan to reintroduce a lag into the
Is it just me or does it looks like the debug output for
CF show the templates in alphabetical order instead of by
execution sequence? I am talking about the output below
Execution Time.
Yes, that's correct.
Is there a way to change this?
No, I don't think you can. I suspect they're
http://www.w3c.org
might be a good place to start..
Steven Lancaster
Barrios Technology
NASA/JSC
281-244-2444 (voice)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Edgar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: Netscape VS IE
Sorry
Yes, that's all well and good. However, my original point,
which I didn't
make clear enough, is that when I write a program, that program should
explicitly accept specific inputs from specific locations.
This isn't a
documentation issue, it's a program design issue.
Specific inputs? yes.
Ah.. well, thanks for putting me straight on that.
-Original Message-
From: stas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:23 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Fusebox pros and cons
You still get your FORM and URL vars with Fusebox. If you don't want to read
them from the
Wasn't it Bernard Shaw that said creativity is the ability to cleverly mask
one's sources.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:23 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: RE: OT: OO vs procedural (was: What's the difference...)
Correct,
There is no way to fix this (in CF 4 or 5!...).
-mk w
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:30 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Alphabetical Order for executed templates?
Is it just me or does it looks
XML is an implementation of SGML, which has been around for decades.
Yes indeed.
But I was giving an example of something changing the landscape.
We now have a universally accepted, simple, mostly logical, standard for
structuring data in a self-describing format that's both portable and
Dave, at the end of the day it boils down to semiology - ye may as well call
them ducks and dogs - we differ our billing around whether someone could
(for example) buy a magazine, install a free dreamweaver trial and build a
web page (duck/coder/muppet/whatever) and someone who can write (for
At 12:17 PM 3/12/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Can I ask for examples?
XML.
It doesn't change programming, but it sure changes the landscape.
It's just a change of implementation details, not necessarily
programming concepts; but I understand what you are saying.
btw my guess at first OO
Yes, that's all well and good. However, my original point,
which I didn't make clear enough, is that when I write a
program, that program should explicitly accept specific
inputs from specific locations. This isn't a documentation
issue, it's a program design issue.
Specific
Do any of you out there know how to capture return code from a CFEXECUTE
call?
TIA!
--
SCOTT VAN VLIET
SENIOR ANALYST
SBC SERVICES, INC
Tel: 858.886.3878
Fax: 858.653.6763
Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo