Anyone know how to respool mail in CFMX? Care to share?
I tried removing the Undelievered_ prefix from the filename and place back
in the spool directory with no luck.
Thanks,
Nelson
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with
**
WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL
Please refer to the disclaimer beneath this message
**
Hi,
I am trying to put more structure into my CF code. My idea is to
Stephen,
I usually like to set things either true or false. (or 1 or 0). The true or
false is a little more visual, I think -- so to use your example, I would do it like:
cfif myQuery.RecordCount EQ 0
cfset QueryResults = false
cfelse
cfset QueryResults = true
/cfif
cfif
Any opionions on:
CFSET QueryResults = IIF(myQuery.RecordCount EQ 0, DE(False),
DE(True))
?
Cheers, Hugo
-
Hugo Ahlenius E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project Officer Phone: +46 8
Hi,
Does anyone on this list use VIM as their main CF editor (like me?). I am
trying to find an updated syntax/highlightning file that supports CFSCRIPT
(my only grip about using VIM at the moment), and the maintainer of that
file is not responding to my mail...
Read more about VIM here:
Looks cleaner, but isn't it slower?
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Ahlenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 July 2002 11:31
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Writing efficient CFIF statements
Any opionions on:
CFSET QueryResults = IIF(myQuery.RecordCount EQ 0, DE(False),
DE(True))
?
**
WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL
Please refer to the disclaimer beneath this message
**
Yep it does look a lot cleaner than what I have been doing, but I do have to
I don;t think you can do it directly with cfsearch - I'm sure someone will
correct me if I'm wrong :-)
One way you might be able to achieve what you want is to make use of the
custom1 and custom2 fields when indexing the collection. You may then have
to add each file individually to the
IIF is slower. Couldn't you just do:
cfset QueryResults = myQuery.Recordcount
If recordcount is 0, it would be false anyway
- Original Message -
From: Adrian Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 6:36 AM
Subject: RE: Writing efficient CFIF
Using IIF() is slower.
http://www.corfield.org/coldfusion/codingStandards.htm
At 11:43 AM 7/16/2002 +0100, you wrote:
**
WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL
Please refer to the disclaimer beneath this message
**
WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL
Please refer to the disclaimer beneath this message
**
Yeah, I like that idea. Thanks I think I'll try and use it.
Cheers.
Looks cleaner, but isn't it slower?
Any opionions on:
CFSET QueryResults = IIF(myQuery.RecordCount EQ 0, DE(False),
DE(True))
IIF is supposed to be a little inefficient, but its like all these things.
Its probably take a couple of milliseconds longer, so it really makes no
I just tested it on MX and it works the same.
Tim P.
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Moretti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:05 AM
Subject: Re: Writing efficient CFIF statements
Looks cleaner, but isn't it slower?
Any
Why set anything? If you're down to this simple of a decision (0 or 1), I
would run the query, then use the variable RecordCount in my output since it
already exists. Like so...
cfif QueryName.RecordCount IS 0
do stuff
cfelse
don't do stuff
cfif
Tony Gruen
sfnetworks
Clean and fast:
cfset QueryResults = (myQuery.RecordCount gt 0)
Patrick
__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
This thread is odd. As Tim pointed out earlier, any non-zero value evaluates
as TRUE so you can just say cfif myQuery.RecordCount and be done with it.
That's far cleaner for the eye.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick McElhaney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Is the attribute scope available to CFCs?
I am getting an error that says my form fields are not available to CFCs via the
attribute scope (im using FB3, thus the attribute scope and not form scope).
Ideas? Should I explicitly pass them in using the cfargument tag?
Michael Tangorre
MillenniuM
I would recommend explicitly passing arguments into a CFC method (or even
a custom tag or UDF ) for various reasons, mainly code reusability. To
pass values into a CFC method, you can use either cfinvokeargument or list
them individually in the cfinvoke tag (just like sending variables into
Thanks Jeff..
Works good.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 8:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFCs and Attribute scope.
I would recommend explicitly passing arguments into a CFC method (or even
a custom tag or UDF )
If QueryResults is supposed to be a boolean, isn't
it better to make it a boolean? Doesn't that make
it easier to understand the intent of the code?
cfset QueryResults = myQuery.RecordCount
The above statement tells me that QueryResults holds
the number of records in the query. If I output
the
I have something I've been struggling with for a little while now, and
while after exhaustive research I think I'm on the right path I'm not sure
I understand quite what the actual solution is.
I have a members only website. I use session variables to allow users to
move around within the
Nelson,
This issue includes several known bugs with CFMAIL in CF MX. The first is
the type in Undelievered_. The second is that if you move the file to
the spool directiory, it won't be resent until you restart the CF MX
server. The third issue is that if it can't be resent, it is again
One way you might be able to achieve what you want is to
make use of the custom1 and custom2 fields when indexing
the collection. You may then have to add each file
individually to the collection using cfindex
action=update... and you'd need to write a recursive
function to find all the
Is is possible to get the file size and date last modified
for results using CFSEARCH?
I don't think there's any way to get that information directly from Verity,
but there's nothing to stop you from finding the information on the
filesystem after you've retrieved a set of matching files from
Has this always worked?
I'm sure I tried it in an earlier version of cf (4.5) I think, and it
didn't work.
Can anyone confirm this?
Thanks
Kola
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 July 2002 13:25
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Writing efficient CFIF
Come to an intensive class on Fusebox in Rockville Maryland. Classes
limited to 12 students each so that you can be sure to get your own
questions answered! Sign up today to guarantee a place at
http://www.teratech.com/training/
- Michael Smith, TeraTech, Inc
Class list
**
Sat 7/20/02
Has anyone gotten this:
err.io.short_read
I get it while using the following code:
request.loginerror = 1;
getPageContext().forward(index.cfm);
Michael Tangorre
MillenniuM Information Systems
1101 Wilson Blvd, Suite 1200
Arlington, Virginia 22209
(703) 341-1438
Dave,
FYI
You can add custom1 and Custom 2 when doing an indexing operation on a
file. I do this with an intranet ap that tracks manufacturing runs. The
users upload PDF drawings of revisions on a design and I add the primary
key and product line to custom 1 and 2. Then, when I do a full
Has this always worked?
I'm sure I tried it in an earlier version of cf (4.5) I think,
and it didn't work.
Can anyone confirm this?
If by this, you mean the fact that CF evaluates non-zero values as true
and zero as false, yes, that's worked in every version of CF back to at
least 3.
The setup...CFMX, Oracle 8, Solaris.
The problem...retrieving WDDX packets created in CF 4.5
Code is attached. It takes a CF structure, CFML2WDDX packets it, inserts it into a
CLOB column, retrieves it and WDDX2CFMLs it.
If I run this on CFMX its fine. But, if I create the WDDX on CF 4.5 and
You can add custom1 and Custom2 when doing an indexing
operation on a file.
Thanks! I didn't know that. I don't think it worked in CF 4.x, but it's nice
to know that it works now.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444
We have to protect an entire directory and it's subdirectories with CF.
We'd like to use CF to process our logins.. but can't have people directly
linking to JPGs and MPGs etc under neath.. since CF can't really protect
these individual files unless called through a CFM page, we've run into a
Are there any reliable alternatives for using CFHTTP on Unix (in my case,
Solaris, but migrating to Linux in the near future)? I need to pass large
WDDX packets to a Python server extensively, and CFHTTP is just not an
adequate, scalable solution. Time is also a big factor, so rolling my own
Tangorre, Michael wrote:
Has anyone gotten this:
err.io.short_read
Google returns about 25 hits which should give you some idea of what is
going on.
I get it while using the following code:
request.loginerror = 1;
getPageContext().forward(index.cfm);
Yeah...
I did that before I posted to the list :-)
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 9:58 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Error
Tangorre, Michael wrote:
Has anyone gotten this:
err.io.short_read
Google returns
Jochem,
Welcome to the wonderful world of using java libraries within CFMX...
http://www.macromedia.com/v1/tipsubmission/tip_detail.cfm?tipid=144
Tangorre, might want to see if you're passing any variables on that
forward and you might want to check out the above link and read what
Charles
CF5 allows for ?RequestTimeout=X to be tacked on to any URL to override the
CFADMIN timeout. Does anyone know if there is any way to do this in CFMX? It
seems to ignore this param as far as I can tell.
I want 99.999% of my templates to have a timeout as a protection, but be able to
run some
I looked at the code for the custom tag, lots of error checking in there and what
not its basically just a tag to save on typing.
If I figure out my error I will share on the list..
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16,
You can set the value using a new attribute of cfsettting,
requesttimeout.
===
Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo IM : morpheus
My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it
CF5 allows for ?RequestTimeout=X to be tacked on to any URL to override
the
CFADMIN timeout. Does anyone know if there is any way to do this in CFMX?
It
seems to ignore this param as far as I can tell.
I want 99.999% of my templates to have a timeout as a protection, but be
able to
run some
Well, one of the things that I notice, is that Gecko is simply alot slower
than IE and since AOL now is a Gecko loving ISP your visitors may see some
slow down. I have several sites that run fine on IE and crawl a bit on Gecko,
and keep in mind that some of them do not even use session vars.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jochem,
Welcome to the wonderful world of using java libraries within CFMX...
http://www.macromedia.com/v1/tipsubmission/tip_detail.cfm?tipid=144
Thanx for the heads up. I had read that it was possible but got a bit
jumpy when the .cfm case it wasn't in the docs
CFMX no longer supports the RequestTimeOut attribute on URL. You can use
the following:
CFSETTING RequestTimeOut=#url.RequestTimeOut#
Is stated on the Migrating ColdFusion 5 Apps doc that came in the CFMX
box.
[]'s
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL
Did I mention that I was using the FB3 architecutre for this application that is
throwing the weird error?
Thought maybe that might be important...
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:26 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:50:24 -0400, Dave Carabetta
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there any reliable alternatives for using CFHTTP on Unix (in my case,
Solaris, but migrating to Linux in the near future)? I need to pass large
WDDX packets to a Python server extensively, and CFHTTP is just not an
but it IS a boolean. 1 and 0 are boolean yes and no (in most languages).
chris olive
-Original Message-
From: Patrick McElhaney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 8:59 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Writing efficient CFIF statements
If QueryResults is supposed to be
Well, there you go... FB3 is your problem. ;) (Just kidding)
~Todd
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Tangorre, Michael wrote:
Did I mention that I was using the FB3 architecutre for this application that is
throwing the weird error?
Thought maybe that might be important...
Mike
-Original
Are you using apache? You could probably use CF to write an .htaccess
file...
-- jon
-
jon roig
senior manager, online production
epilepsy foundation
phone: 215.850.0710
site: http://www.epilepsyfoundation.org
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: JLH
LOL :-)
You might just be right!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Error
Well, there you go... FB3 is your problem. ;) (Just kidding)
~Todd
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Tangorre,
Actually we are using IIS.
But. we may be able to use Apache.. nothing is set in stone yet...
How would we go about doing the HTAccess.?
J
- Original Message -
From: jon roig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:36 AM
Subject: RE:
I'll tell you what though, this is stumping me!!!
I'm gonna go over and post it on the FB list as well..
hopefully someone will have an idea..
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Tangorre, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:40 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Error
LOL :-)
You
couldn't you just say...
cfif not(len(myQuery.recordcount))
Douglas Brown
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Patrick McElhaney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 5:20 AM
Subject: RE: Writing efficient CFIF statements
Check out this tutorial...
This will give you an idea on how do set one up, then you should be able to go from
there ans how to get CF to write it...
http://faq.clever.net/htaccess.htm
Mike
-Original Message-
From: JLH All Turbo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002
A Boolean value is a logical TRUE or FALSE. In some languages, this is
represented as 0 and 1 or 0 and non-zero, but that's an implementation
detail.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Olive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE:
Thanks ray :) It's Terry Ford here btw. Sort of lurking. Taking some time
to build up my website since I left MM.
You wouldnt happen to know much about CFMX on linux would you? I'm
encountering a weird problem..
Terry
- Original Message -
From: Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Dave Carabetta wrote:
Are there any reliable alternatives for using CFHTTP on Unix (in my case,
Solaris, but migrating to Linux in the near future)? I need to pass large
WDDX packets to a Python server extensively, and CFHTTP is just not an
adequate, scalable solution. Time is also a big
I need a Flash mp3 player similar to the sample that comes with MX.
My app is for a talent agency. I've already built the admin where they can
upload a sound clip for each actor.
Here's what I want to do:
User clicks on an actor's name. The actors detail page is displayed, along
with the
Got it.
Any ideas on how else to do it in IIS and CF?
I wish IIS had an authent scheme to look for my cookie and it's content and
see that's it there, so let them have access.
That'd be nice.
J
- Original Message -
From: Tangorre, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL
couldn't you just say...
cfif not(len(myQuery.recordcount))
You would only ever get one result from the evaluation... because the length
of recordcount will never be less than 1 ... i.e. cfif not len('0') is the
same as cfif not 1 ... cfif not myQuery.recordcount works tho...
Isaac Dealey
I bet the guys on [EMAIL PROTECTED] would know about CFMX on
linux. I'm running it on RH7.2 myself
~Todd
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Terry Ford wrote:
Thanks ray :) It's Terry Ford here btw. Sort of lurking. Taking some time
to build up my website since I left MM.
You wouldnt happen to know
true...my bad
Douglas Brown
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: S. Isaac Dealey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 7:55 AM
Subject: Re: Writing efficient CFIF statements
couldn't you just say...
cfif
The LEAST no of CFIF is the route to best code/speed etc.. This is my
theory though
Using CFSCRIPT blocks, short-cut evaluation, Switch statements wherever
possible than
CFIF, arranging likely executable CFIF's/Switch first etc
Would be cleaner code to seperate Application Logic from
Hi there,
Hoping to get a few opinions on this topic. Most of my company's CF work thus far has
been custom solutions, but recently we've developed some apps that we can distribute
as a product. (ie download and install on top of CF server) One of the challenges
we've uncovered is coming up
Hi folks. I know this is off-topic, but I'm getting annoyed, and I know
someone here will be able to give the answer.
I'm trying to do one of those javascript boxes where you can click a button
and the items move up or down in the list. I found one that works if I don't
care what the values are
If QueryResults is supposed to be a boolean, isn't
it better to make it a boolean? Doesn't that make
it easier to understand the intent of the code?
You can certainly make this argument, but it's hard to confuse the intent of
code which uses integers to determine boolean values. For example,
**
WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL
Please refer to the disclaimer beneath this message
**
Thanks Joe,
That was what I was kind of looking for. I am also thinking
AuthentiX... used it before.. How do you go about tracking who downloaded
what and how many times etc? AuthentiX is built with an ISAPI filter that
overrides Windows NT security model..(Challenge/Response) and creates
an Authenticated user, (CGI.Auth_User) gets populated. The other
If you are going to do that, you might think of using fusebox, which does a
very good job of seperating the application logic away from the the display.
You can also use just one layout file and have it inherited by all the child
directories etc...
http://www.fusebox.org
Douglas Brown
If you looking at application architecture design.. Fusebox does a good job
www.fusebox.org. this has helped me a lot.
all sorts of changes can be done much faster... and gets code organized.
Joe
Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Adams,
**
WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL
Please refer to the disclaimer beneath this message
**
True, I have looked at Fusebox, but at the moment I am not building a
Fusebox
While I'm waiting for some help desk people to get back in touch with me, I
wanted to send this question to the list:
We upgraded our test server to CFMX (finally) and run ActivePDF on just
about every site on the server (PDF is a standard over here). When we
upgraded CFMX totally botched the
Ok, having gone through the custom tag (cfforward), and having played around with the
encode types of forms... the issue lies in here somewhere... it is beyond me however..
According to the author of the custom tag, using a forward on the action page of a
form will throw an error and does not
Still trying to decide how I like to perform some type of recursive
query wth the following Table structure;
ID NAME PARENT_ID
If the current record IS the parent then the Parent ID is 0
Otherwise the child has the ID of the parent as it's Parent ID.
Anyone have any good references on
True, I have looked at Fusebox, but at the moment I am not building a
Fusebox app, but I see your point and I should use what I know about
Fusebox
and apply it to my none Fusebox code.
Start out with the techniques in FB2 and you'll get your coding standards to
something like you're trying
MX is having some COM problems right now, and they are working on a fix to the
problem. Hopefully a patch will come out soon.
Douglas Brown
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Smith, Don , , WHS/PSD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July
HI,
I am looking into upgrading to CF MX from 4.5.1 and I am using
Deerfield's Website Pro 2.54. I am seeing that there are issues
involved with the combination of CFMX and Website Pro 3. I am
looking for any and all solutions to the issue.
Thanks
Dave Miller
I had to write a stored proc to recursively scan a tree structure. The only
way I could find to do this was through the use of a temp table, and a
second query.
Basically - Query 1(which is the entry point into the routine) would create
the temp table, then call the recursive stored proc (which
I looped this:
SELECT *
WHERE PARENT_ID IN (#keyList#)
appending the keys returned to a list, and kept going till recordcount = 0
That goes from parent to all children, grandchildcren, all the way down.
Going up is the opposite.
I can chunk you the code if you want.
Matthew P.
I don't have any experience with Website Pro, but I recommend you
Upgrade to 5.0. It is faster then 4.5.1 and just as stable.
MX so far has been a big headache. Hopefully there will be patches that
magically take care of things.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a very complex query that I used to use to generate a report from:
ID Parent Name
1 0 Dad
2 1 Daughter
3 2 Grandson
To this:
Master_Parent Parent Topic count
Dad Dad Daughter
Does that only allow a set level of depth?
Ideally, it should allow nth level relationships, eh?
Matthew P. Smith
Web Developer, Object Oriented
Naval Education Training Professional
Development Technology Center
(NETPDTC)
(850)452-1001 ext. 1245
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Matthew,
I know that where I am located (Columbus, OH) there is a chapter of a
professional organzation called Society of Technical Writers(?) or
Association of Technical Writers(?). Typically, in an association such
as that, there are a number of freelancers, some specialized in Software
Just about every company has someone who is excellent at writing, and nobody
knows your applications like the people that you work with. I would see who in
the office might be good at it. Receptionist, salesperson etc...etc... and
then sit them down with the developer and more than likely they
Bob Denny is working on a connector that'll allow you to use WSP 3 and CFMX. I've been
testing it on and off for weeks now. It's rather nice and should be out soon. Till
then, I'm running on CF 5 and WSP 3. (I've been on WS since the beginning)
HI,
I am looking into upgrading to CF MX from
Sorry I meant:
cfif somequery.recordcount
...
Kola
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 July 2002 14:49
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Writing efficient CFIF statements
Has this always worked?
I'm sure I tried it in an earlier version of cf (4.5) I
cfquery name=dbtree
select ID, NAME, PARENT_ID, Max(ID) as MAXID
from wherever
/cfquery
cfset tree = ArrayNew(1)
cfset ArraySet(tree, 1, dbtree.MAXID, )
cfloop query=dbtree
tree[dbtree.ID] = StructNew();
tree[dbtree.ID].ID = dbtree.ID;
tree[dbtree.ID].NAME
Matthew, my answer maybe SOT also but here goes. We use the Fusebox
framework for development, the relevance of this is that the use of
Fuseactions in fusebox makes it really easy to implement not only the
application itself but ancillary things like Help Docs, Developer-Client
interaction etc.
Still trying to decide how I like to perform some type of recursive
query wth the following Table structure;
ID NAME PARENT_ID
If the current record IS the parent then the Parent ID is 0
Otherwise the child has the ID of the parent as it's Parent ID.
Anyone have any good references
Hi,
I'm getting the following error :
--- begin error ---
invalid character code
The error occurred while processing an element with a general identifier
of (CFWDDX), occupying document position (21:5) to (21:108) in the
template file ...
--- end error ---
in the page that
True, I have looked at Fusebox, but at the moment I am not building a
Fusebox app, but I see your point and I should use what I know about
Fusebox
and apply it to my none Fusebox code.
Start out with the techniques in FB2 and you'll get your coding standards
to
something like you're
I really wish that people using my documents (originally posted in issues of FA) put
down where they got the information from. I see chunks of information on that page
taken directly from me.
Now as for IIS() under MX. I've tested it heavily and there is literally no difference
speed wise
If you don't choose to add those fields(I recommend you follow S. Isaac's
method which is actually something from a guy named joe celko for which you
can search google for) then you can do a udf in cfMX which calls a query
which calls itself for each child. Or in cf5, you have to write a custom
I wouldn't declare it dead for the sake of readability. That above
anything is a good reason not to use it.
~Todd
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
I really wish that people using my documents (originally posted in issues of FA) put
down where they got the information from. I
This patch may help:
http://www.macromedia.com/v1/Handlers/index.cfm?ID=22955Method=Full
Marius Milosav
www.scorpiosoft.com
It's not about technology, it's about people.
Virtual Company (VICO) Application Demo
www.scorpiosoft.com/vicodemo/login.cfm
- Original Message -
From:
I'm declaring it dead for the sake of it not being an issue anymore. My original post
and times for it showed IIF() being half as fast as CFIF. This is no longer true.
Readability is a totally different issue.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/alert/index.cfm?alertid=9#Tech1
Actually, the main problem with using IIF() now is that few people know how to use it
right. The double evaluation issue, using DE vs. double quoting, etc. I'm going to
have to revise my paper on it and get it out there again. :)
http://www.fusionauthority.com/iif.cfm
I wouldn't declare it
If you don't choose to add those fields(I recommend you follow S. Isaac's
method which is actually something from a guy named joe celko for which
you can search google for)
This is news to me. :) I'll have to look him up.
Isaac Dealey
www.turnkey.to
954-776-0046
If you don't choose to add those fields(I recommend you follow S. Isaac's
method which is actually something from a guy named joe celko for which
you
can search google for) then you can do a udf in cfMX which calls a query
which calls itself for each child. Or in cf5, you have to write a
chris.alvarado wrote:
Still trying to decide how I like to perform some type of recursive
query wth the following Table structure;
ID NAME PARENT_ID
If the current record IS the parent then the Parent ID is 0
Otherwise the child has the ID of the parent as it's Parent ID.
We just installed CFMX on a brand new server, W2k with SQL 2000. Most
CF5 codes worked and no problems with stored procedures so far, except a
few errors on simple queries. One of them was quite weird.
Name : VARCHAR(128)
Cost: real
tableA joins tableB on (tableA.ID = tableB.aID)
Case 1:
1 - 100 of 237 matches
Mail list logo