While our company is quite anal about licensing issues (in that every
instance is accounted for and all new software monitored/tracked) on a
personal level my belief is that pirated software has its placesome
may think that's a ridiculous statement but I truly think it can help
drive market
Wait for the user complaints to start rolling in. Or for him to ask we
don't see to be getting much usage out of that form ...
H.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Bunton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:51 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: submit cfform
Jeff D. Chastain wrote:
Okay, this is getting really frustrating. Whenever I start my machine,
the CFMX App Server service is terminating with a 'service-specific
error 2'. Sometimes if I do a restart on my machine I can get it to
start and work - other times, no joy.
I have uninstalled CFMX
At 04:53 PM 1/9/2003, you wrote:
Yeah, that's actually what I am doing, if the first fails, no need to
do the second one at all. The problem lies in that when the second query
fails, I need to roll back the first.
--
jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are a couple of ways to do this, but you
Nope...removing semi-colons did not help...but thanks ;-)
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Macromedia Associate Partner
www.macromedia.com
I showed it to him without a submit button and he loved it. Just what I
wanted *shrugs* what can ya do.
Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: Owens, Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: submit cfform without submit button
So many
Ahhhthat did the trick.thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] whoever you are (yer a
Canuck and that's good enough for me) ;-)
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
t. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is interesting -- and seems to validate Java, CFMX for J2EE
optimization, and the multiple-server instances clustering
capabilities of JRun.
It would be interesting (at least to me) to see how well an Xserve
would perform/scale in comparison,
I have heard rumors (FWIW) that 2,4,and 8
At 2:05 PM 1/9/3, Haggerty, Mike wrote:
That's not fair!
Please reread.
tx,
jd
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
That's not fair!
New Atlanta is just building another app server to parse CF code and
emulating each and every function they can, while adding in a few features
to impress the gurus here and there.
Despite the fact they are trying to undercut Macromedia's price, this
product was built over time
I would love to see that as well...Awesome product...
-Original Message-
From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX on J2EE for Linux Performance Brief
That is interesting -- and seems to validate Java, CFMX
Is this a style sheet you're including via the link tag? If so, then you need to
remove the style tags.
- Original Message -
From: Bryan Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, January 9, 2003 2:42 pm
Subject: Re: OT: style sheet weirdness
Nope...removing semi-colons did not
Wait for the user complaints to start rolling in.
Dear Bob,
We've been trying to order the $1745.32 widget off your website for the last
three weeks, but there's no way to submit the order form once we fill it
out. Bruce found another one for us at HQ the other day, so we no longer
need the
As we all know, CFMX compiles to Java Bytecode and gets
cached this way. Therefore, CFMX should be considerably
faster than CF5. However, a friend of mine did a very
simple perfornance test using CFMX that had NO database
interaction (just looping and finding prime numbers) and
didn't
Yeah, that's actually what I am doing, if the first fails, no need to
do the second one at all. The problem lies in that when the second query
fails, I need to roll back the first.
--
jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, January 9, 2003, 3:27:33 PM, you wrote:
MA According to Mastering
At 10:41 AM 1/9/3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 3:48 PM 1/8/3, John Dowdell wrote:
At 6:39 PM 1/7/3, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
JRun 4 + CFMX = $900/CPU + $3400/CPU = $4300/CPU
Tomcat + BlueDragon = Free + $1000/server = $1000/server
Hmm... how do you respond to
I don't know what others would say but we've found it useful to put all the queries,
server-side form validation, and business logic in one or more cfcs. Then the action
page just acts a controller, taking in the action that was requested and calling the
appropriate function(s) in the cfc to
I have an Access memo field storing paragraphs. I have CF outputting the
field. I want to have some formatting in the output (eg. a hyperlink, Bold
or Italics). I did this locally (CF MX) with the function URLDecode.
However, my ISP server is CF 4.0 and it won't render. Could someone suggest
a
Am trying to move several sites from CF5 to MX. Most have
clientmanagement enabled. For administrative sections
(where I know the browser/system client uses) I use the
old embedded form validation (field_required, field_date,
etc) in several places. Of course use scripted server-side
I'm currently testing ColdFusion MX for possible deployment in a Windows
2000/IIS shared hosting environment. I've followed the instructions in
the release notes as well as those found in the following tech notes:
ColdFusion MX: ColdFusion Server (on multihomed servers) displays wrong
page:
As we all know, CFMX compiles to Java Bytecode and gets cached this way. Therefore,
CFMX should be considerably faster than CF5. However, a friend of mine did a very
simple perfornance test using CFMX that had NO database interaction (just looping and
finding prime numbers) and didn't see
At 05:05 PM 1/9/2003, you wrote:
Despite the fact they are trying to undercut Macromedia's price, this
product was built over time at great expense, and has worth in the
marketplace, what makes New Atlanta seem like a parasite?
I'm sure he was talking about software pirates, not New Atlanta,
Netscape 4 doesn't like background-color: transparent; either, even though the W3C
validator OKs it. If you use anything other than transparent, it's fine though.
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Kime
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:43 PM
Subject: RE: SOLVED Re:
The only way I can eliminate the error is to delete the individual
domain mappings and change the logical mapping / so that it points
at
one of the Web site's root directories. That site then works properly.
However, for obvious reasons, that only works for a single domain.
How about just
instance is accounted for and all new software monitored/tracked) on a
personal level my belief is that pirated software has its placesome
may think that's a ridiculous statement but I truly think it can help
drive market penetration and developer bases...
well when cf4 finally hit the
The way I read it (and I have some experience in this area):
If you sell on price alone (or stress price) your product will be
perceived to be worth less.
If that's what you are selling (price) then that's what I will be
tempted to bargain (haggle).
Once you start down that path, the
I have a set of db inserts involving two datasources
and if there is a failure in the 2nd datasource, I
need to roll back the transaction on the first datasource.
In a perfect world I could somehow hold up the first
transaction commit until the transaction on the second
datasource has
What exactly are you comparing? If you compare load time remember that
CFMX has to compile the CFM the first time it's run which takes time.
This only happens once.
-Original Message-
From: Fregas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Thanks so much, Dave! After quick test, using the cfheader seems to solve
the problem.
Man, I've been pulling my hair out about this and now it's as easy as adding
one line of code!
I see that much more time info is being passed to the header when
clientmanagement is enabled. Wonder what it is
On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 03:54 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
This is CFMX Pro, not any of the J2EE versions.
That doesn't make any significant difference for your purposes, I don't
think.
According to what I have read, CFMX for J2EE has been optimized to
perform better and scale better
Can I do a structure in a structure? For example, I have a Customer that
can contain a Company and one for more buying and billing people:
Module defCustomer.cfm:
cfscript
attributes.Customer.Key=0;
attributes.Customer.IsCompany = False;
attributes.Customer.IsDeleted = False;
From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sorry. I think it's pretty irresponsible of apple to put out a
browser that doesn't meet standards. Especially when they intend to ship
it with the OS.
As opposed to Microsoft and Netscape, who put out browsers that don't
meet standards...
--
http://homepage.mac.com/jasongile/
I am the old Fart in the background of the last picture
this is my family!
I am really proud!
Thanks for toleratin'
Dick
~|
Archives:
Heh heh!
Actually it is very much based on approved standards (see
http://www.w3.org/).
From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sorry. I think it's pretty irresponsible of apple to put out a
browser that doesn't meet standards. Especially when they intend to
ship it with the OS.
On Thursday, Jan 9, 2003, at 15:12 US/Pacific, Fregas wrote:
As we all know, CFMX compiles to Java Bytecode and gets cached this
way. Therefore, CFMX should be considerably faster than CF5.
However, a friend of mine did a very simple perfornance test using
CFMX that had NO database
On Thursday, Jan 9, 2003, at 14:41 US/Pacific, Ken Wilson wrote:
In scanning through it one question pops to mind. On page 7 it states
that
trusted cache was enabled on both CFMX Enterprise and CFMX for JRun
but it
does not state that it was turned on for CF5. Wouldn't that tend to
skew
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0321180585
Sometimes I just love Amazon :-)
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
On Thursday, Jan 9, 2003, at 20:14 US/Pacific, Larry W. Virden wrote:
As opposed to Microsoft and Netscape, who put out browsers that don't
meet standards...
The great thing about standards is that there are so many to choose
from...
If you've ever worked in standards - ISO Standards in
These are multi-megabyte movies...?!?!?
On Thursday, Jan 9, 2003, at 21:00 US/Pacific, Dick Applebaum wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/jasongile/
I am the old Fart in the background of the last picture
this is my family!
I am really proud!
Thanks for toleratin'
Dick
On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 01:43 AM, webguy wrote:
Hi Dick,
did you try to use installer to a manual install
Have a look here for details
title:CFMX for J2EE: Manual Installation
@
http://www.corfield.org/blog/2003_01_01_archive.html
Not exactly. I used a similar
It's my webmail client. Keeps putting my email address as my name even though I tell
it to use my name.
I'm actually Billy Bob Thorton :)
- Original Message -
From: Bryan Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, January 9, 2003 3:08 pm
Subject: Re: OT: style sheet weirdness
Nope, that does not effect anything. The other box I have here is the
exact same setup and it is working fine - no registry modifications or
anything - just a straight-forward install.
Any Macromedia people out there?
Thanks
-- Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Houwing
Well Billy Bob...that's Shaw for yaTelus ADSL for me ;-)
Does anyone know why a style sheet would be completely ignored in Netscape
4.07?
I'm using this to include the sheet:
head
titleGeneric CSS Examples/title
link href=generic_styles.css rel=stylesheet type=text/css
/head
and a style
I've read each of your posts several times and I still can't fathom what
you're trying to say. You seem to be arguing that by being less
expensive, New Atlanta opens themselves up to a greater degree of
piracy? This seems to fly in the face of common sense, so either my
interpretation is incorrect
I stumbled across a very cool validation plugin for Mozilla. Checky can
validate HTML, XHTML, CSS, RDF, RSS, XML, SGML, WAI, 508 and more by
just pressing F10.
Check it out at http://checky.mozdev.org/
After some testing I have settled for validating against W3C HTML and
CSS and some Spanish
Samuel R. Neff wrote:
1. Use DB level transactions. Haven't done it with CF, but you should be
able to just put begin trans; commit; rollback inside a cfquery.
Isn't a connection returned to the pool after a closing cfquery tag when
not using transactions?
Jochem
In scanning through it one question pops to mind. On page 7 it states that
trusted cache was enabled on both CFMX Enterprise and CFMX for JRun but it
does not state that it was turned on for CF5. Wouldn't that tend to skew the
results in favor of the CFMX flavors from the outset? Right after the
That's not fair!
Please reread.
Uh, I've reread it, and I don't understand your original statement either.
At 6:39 PM 1/7/3, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
JRun 4 + CFMX = $900/CPU + $3400/CPU = $4300/CPU
Tomcat + BlueDragon = Free + $1000/server = $1000/server
Hmm... how do you respond to
FYI, I believe using underscores is against CSS spec (not sure which
one(s))...use dashes instead.
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOLVED Re: OT: style sheet weirdness
OK...the issue was
101 - 149 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
