As far as I can tell, there's no difference between
the web server used by CFMX for JRun and that used
by the standalone CFMX Enterprise or Professional.
Are your comments based on any sort of stress testing
results or published literature? I agree with what
you're saying, but last
I brought this issue up months ago, the member gallery has become completely
unusable for me on Windows XP, IE 6.1 machines. I have brought this up to
members of Macromedia and they say they will get back to me and they never
do. I have done a couple workarounds that Macromedia has suggested and
Yes this is a good methodology to consider as we all move out of procedural
methodologies to more 'OO' based concepts. Yet in my opinion there is a
further dimension that Fusebox achieves, or has done for us, that I have not
yet seen expounded in CFMX tutorials etc.
Using Fusebox in conjunction
Robert,
Please send the URL of the service you are trying to access on
Macromedia's website to me off-list. Also, how long has this been
happening, and do you know who at Macromedia you spoke with?
Thanks,
Christian
On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 11:40 AM, Robert Everland wrote:
I
On Saturday, Jan 11, 2003, at 20:58 US/Pacific, Cutter (CF_Talk) wrote:
Has anyone here taken a detailed look at the CFMX (semi) OOP design
pattern put forth at http://www.benorama.com? Is anyone here using it?
Formed some opinions? Have anything to add (or subtract)? Know who put
this
Hi,
If I reference an APPLICATION var using isDefined, do I have to read lock
it. Is the var really being read?
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
A slight problem I'm having with qForms JS API. I have different submit
buttons that do different things on my form, and I want some of them to just
skip the whole qForms validation process.
For instance, some fields have a configurable number of rows, and the
buttons to add or remove rows are
On Sunday, Jan 12, 2003, at 12:23 US/Pacific, Webmaster wrote:
If I reference an APPLICATION var using isDefined, do I have to read
lock
it. Is the var really being read?
No, but...
If you are trying to avoid a race condition, you may need to lock. See
my blog entry:
- Original Message -
From: Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I reference an APPLICATION var using isDefined, do I have to read
lock
it. Is the var really being read?
---
Yep - if you're not on CFMX, even IsDefined(sharedScope.varName) needs a
lock around it. If
http://www.needscripts.com
==
Peter Tilbrook
Internet Applications Developer
Australian Building Codes Board
GPO Box 9839
CANBERRA ACT 2601
AUSTRALIA
WWW: http://www.abcb.gov.au/
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telephone: (02) 6213 6731
Mobile: 0439 401 823
Facsimile: (02) 6213 7287
While there arguably are circumstances where you don't need to lock, if
you just do it always, everywhere (subject to the smart use of temp vars
as was pointed out already), your code will work properly. I have yet
to see any instance where locking instituted any noticeable performance
penalty at
The Sybase evangelist just emailed information about the following:
PowerEasy and Sybase Announce First Packaged Enterprise-Class ERP
System Powered by Sybase and Apple Infrastructure
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/030106/60324_1.html
PowerEasy is at:
http://www.powereasy.com/
Sybase is at:
On Sunday, Jan 12, 2003, at 13:23 US/Pacific, Matt Robertson wrote:
I have yet
to see any instance where locking instituted any noticeable performance
penalty at any level.
If you lock within Application.cfm, you will single-thread your
application and it will not scale. For low-traffic
fantastic - thanks
Here ya go
http://www.xs4all.nl/~ppk/js/flash.html
Robert Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Famous for nothing!
http://www.tinetics.com
-Original Message-
From: Antony Sideropoulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 8:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject:
Sean A Corfield wrote:
On Sunday, Jan 12, 2003, at 13:23 US/Pacific, Matt Robertson wrote:
I have yet
to see any instance where locking instituted any noticeable performance
penalty at any level.
If you lock within Application.cfm, you will single-thread your
application and it will not
I got a tip previously on cf-talk that advised me to do this in my
application.cfm:
!--- Page By Page Session Variables ---
CFIF IsDefined(Session.Collections)
cflock scope=session type=readonly timeout=20
cfset request.session = duplicate(session)
/cflock
/CFIF
On Sunday, Jan 12, 2003, at 14:20 US/Pacific, Jochem van Dieten wrote:
Sean A Corfield wrote:
If you lock within Application.cfm, you will single-thread your
application and it will not scale. For low-traffic applications, that
may be fine.
I think that is a bit of an oversimplification.
(from Java Network Programming)
Because of limitations in the lengths of environment variables on some platforms, the
GET method is unreliable for sending more than 200 characters of text.
As well, from
http://www.macromedia.com/support/generator/ts/documents/passing_character_limit.htm:
We have just recently installed cf5 on a linux platform. We are getting errors using
CFFILE CFDIRECTORY, even thought thay are activated in the administrator.
I think it might be some sort of ownership problem, can anyone point me in the right
direction
thanks
Steve Soars
I didn't mean to imply that there wasn't a dumb way to use cflock :D,
just that its *proper* use is going to give good results and the reverse
can *generally* be counted on to do the opposite. My point was that if
you are going to use shared scope vars, lock 'em always.
oops sorry wrong list
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:20 PM
Subject: cf5 linux
We have just recently installed cf5 on a linux platform. We are getting
errors using CFFILE CFDIRECTORY, even thought thay are
I am having a really weird problem... I do some calculations in CF, they
work on my development machine (Windows XP Home/Apache) but when I
upload them to my host (Windows 2000/IIS) they don't work. I get this
error... anybody able to help me on this one?
*** *** ***
Error Diagnostic
Yes,
I have had similar errors. Its usually when your query does not return a
numerical data where a number is expected.
Check your database--specially the rows in numerical columns. Replacing
null/empty numerical cells with 0 (zero) might solve your problem
HTH
Srimanta
23 matches
Mail list logo
