RE: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Peter Bagnato
What stalls? Can you explain and share the code? -Original Message- From: Dave Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 12:20 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: uploading progress bar Importance: High I looked up cfflush in the docs and ran the example and it stalls

RE: CF based financial calculators

2003-02-15 Thread Tim Laureska
Dave... if you wouldn't mind would you send it to me also Tim Laureska [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dave Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:25 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF based financial calculators i have a mortgage one never opened it

CFMX CFHTTP test

2003-02-15 Thread Bud
Hi all. Can someone drop this code into a page on an MX server and see if you get a response? cfhttp url=https://www.ups.com/ups.app/xml/Rate; method=POST cfhttpparam type=formfield name=xml value='?xml version=1.0? AccessRequest xml:lang=en-US AccessLicenseNumber/AccessLicenseNumber

Re: CFMX CFHTTP test

2003-02-15 Thread DDB Lists
FILECONTENT 0 Failure Hard 250005 No Access Identification provided HEADER HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Netscape-Enterprise/6.0 Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:24:25 GMT Pragma: no-cache Content-Type: application/xml Connection: close MIMETYPE application/xml RESPONSEHEADER CONNECTION

RE: CFMX CFHTTP test

2003-02-15 Thread Peter Bagnato
I ran it I just received a blank screen. I am inserting all the debug information at the bottom of this email. I know that the USPS has web services available, so if you want to get certain information from them, you might want to looking into using that route. Peter Bagnato Here's the

Re: CF based financial calculators

2003-02-15 Thread Cutter (CF_Talk)
Nate, Check out the Mortgage Calc on http://www.firstshorefederal.com and contact me off list if it would meet your needs. (Gratis) Cutter Nate wrote: Can anyone point me to a good source for CF based financial calculators? I am looking for loan and mortage payment calcs as well as savings,

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
the example on MM site stalls out not the code you sent back in :) Dave - Original Message - From: Peter Bagnato [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 7:53 AM Subject: RE: uploading progress bar What stalls? Can you explain and share the

RE: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Peter Bagnato
Can you post the code from the MM site so I can take a look at it? -Original Message- From: Dave Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 11:50 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: uploading progress bar Importance: High the example on MM site stalls out not the code

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
!--- Page header --- cfmodule template=../../resource/include/html_header.cfm title=CFFLUSH Example pThe following example uses cfloop tags and the rand random number generating function to delay data display. CFFLUSH is used to force the browser to output data as it becomes available, rather

RE: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Peter Bagnato
I ran the code and it worked just fine (I did remove the CFMODULE header and CFINCLUDE footer). Did you intall SP2 on your server yet? pThe following example uses cfloop tags and the rand random number generating function to delay data display. CFFLUSH is used to force the browser to output data

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
yeah I have installed it im talking about the Macromedia example on there site chokes, not on mine totally chokes in IE an in mozilla it starts to work followed by this error: Error Occurred While Processing Request The request has exceeded the allowable time limit Tag: CFLOOP The Error

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
also running a 512 cable modem, so it shouldnt be the connection Dave - Original Message - From: Dave Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 12:58 PM Subject: Re: uploading progress bar yeah I have installed it im talking about the

RE: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Peter Bagnato
How about sending the link so I can click on it and give it a try... This should be interesting :) -Original Message- From: Dave Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 1:03 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: uploading progress bar Importance: High also running a

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
http://examples.macromedia.com/coldfusion/cfflush/? Dave - - Original Message - From: Peter Bagnato [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 1:08 PM Subject: RE: uploading progress bar How about sending

RE: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Peter Bagnato
Yes, I got the same error message... Maybe MM should fix it ;) -Original Message- From: Dave Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 1:35 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: uploading progress bar Importance: High http://examples.macromedia.com/coldfusion/cfflush/?

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
lol and while they are at it, it would be nice for them to make some examples that you can actually use. I hate them damn forms they put into all the examples, screws everything up. oh yeah, i guess thats why i bought bens book, forget i have it sometimes, doh! Dave - Original Message -

Re: CFMX CFHTTP test

2003-02-15 Thread Bud
And this is on MX? On 2/15/03, DDB Lists penned: FILECONTENT 0 Failure Hard 250005 No Access Identification provided HEADER HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Netscape-Enterprise/6.0 Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:24:25 GMT Pragma: no-cache Content-Type: application/xml Connection: close

Basic HTML Question

2003-02-15 Thread Peter Bagnato
I just inherited a web site from another developer. Several times he is used the following code: cfoutput A HREF=RecordEdit.cfm###header#/A /cfoutput Can anyone explain what purpose the '##' serves at the end of the HREF? Thanks! Peter BAgnato

Re: Basic HTML Question

2003-02-15 Thread Paul Giesenhagen
I am not sure what he is actually using it for, but the output would be RecordEdit.cfm# (one #) Paul Giesenhagen QuillDesign - Original Message - From: Peter Bagnato [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 1:47 PM Subject: Basic HTML Question

Re: Basic HTML Question

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
i would assume its a typo but they should basically cancel out since there is nothing in between. I'm a newbie so i dont know but could it possibly a nifty lil trick to not show the rest of the string in the browser? dave !--- doesnt know jack about cfm --- - Original Message - From:

RE: Basic HTML Question

2003-02-15 Thread Peter Bagnato
That's what I thought, but I see it all over the place... I'm just trying to figure out if there is some reason for it that I'm not aware of... -Original Message- From: Paul Giesenhagen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:46 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Basic

Re: Basic HTML Question

2003-02-15 Thread Paul Giesenhagen
Oops .. you are right ... ### would leave one ... nothing like wrong answers :) Paul Giesenhagen QuillDesign - Original Message - From: Dave Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 1:53 PM Subject: Re: Basic HTML Question i would assume

RE: Basic HTML Question

2003-02-15 Thread Peter Bagnato
I got ahold of the guy who wrote the code, he said when he converted the site from DW 2.0 to DW 4.0 it wiped all his variable out. He...he... Caveat emperor ;) -Original Message- From: Paul Giesenhagen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:51 PM To: CF-Talk

RE: CFMX CFHTTP test

2003-02-15 Thread Chris White
I ran the code and I did not get an error message just a blank page. Chris -Original Message- From: Peter Bagnato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 11:27 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX CFHTTP test I ran it I just received a blank screen. I am

taglib file

2003-02-15 Thread Jesse Houwing
Hey, I found this in the taglib file: = Provide access to CFML application scope. in CF5 and earlier, applications must have a name. Neo supports this behavior by prefixing the application name onto the variable name. In addition, neo allows you to have an un-named

Re: Basic HTML Question

2003-02-15 Thread E. Keith Dodd
I've used that, however, with a named anchor so go to certain spot on referenced page. Unless a reasonable explanation, looks like is prepared for any anchor--unless I'm missing something, which very possible on a Saturday. E. Keith Dodd Wings of Eagles Services www.wingserv.com - Original

RE: taglib file

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Watts
I found this in the taglib file: = Provide access to CFML application scope. in CF5 and earlier, applications must have a name. ... Either way, java can share variables with a legacy cf application by prepending the application name onto the servlet context key

RE: Basic HTML Question

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Watts
Oops .. you are right ... ### would leave one ... nothing like wrong answers :) No, you were right. In a string marked for output (within a CFOUTPUT, for example), if you want to use a literal pound sign you can escape it by doubling it. If you placed three pound signs together within a

RE: MXDU - Corfield

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Watts
Not sure if anyone picked up on this already...but Mr. Corfield is no longer a keynote speaker at MXDU and Branden Hall has been brought in as a last minute replacement (not that I'd complain about a talk from the Flash master himself). More on the conference: http://www.mxdu.com

Re: Basic HTML Question

2003-02-15 Thread Taco Fleur
It's an anchor, however its not a named anchor, so it links to the top of the page. - Original Message - From: E. Keith Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 6:24 AM Subject: Re: Basic HTML Question I've used that, however, with a named

Re: Basic HTML Question

2003-02-15 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
It could be that he uses anchors a lot and typing # at the end of a file name is habitual (though I've never met anyone who used them more often than query strings, being that they're almost mutually exclusive), or it could be the result of a poorly formed multi-file replace in CF Studio. I just

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
Incidentally (I realize I'm late in the thread) here's an example that works: http://www.turnkey.to/tapi/?doc=examples/pod Unfortunately cfflush isn't a huge help when using cffile action=upload for a single file because you can only flush before of after the cffile tag. Though I supposed if you

RE: Basic HTML Question

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Watts
It could be that he uses anchors a lot and typing # at the end of a file name is habitual (though I've never met anyone who used them more often than query strings, being that they're almost mutually exclusive), or it could be the result of a poorly formed multi-file replace in CF

RE: BlueDragon for .NET (WAS CF - PHP comparisons?)

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Watts
Back to Perl, a Year or so ago when MS was showing off .NET the said they had a Java and Perl CLR coming down the line. I think they have something called J#, which will let you compile your Java source to MSIL. I wouldn't expect Microsoft to provide Perl.NET, but I wouldn't be surprised if

RE: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Andy Ousterhout
dave, Could you send it to me as well? Andy -Original Message- From: Dave Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:10 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: uploading progress bar ok if you didnt get it let me know dont forget to let me know how it works i'd like to

RE: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Andrew Golden
At 11:41 PM 2/14/2003 -0500, you wrote: Here you go: !--- Initial Message --- pbPlease wait/b/p !--- Initially display a blank gif --- img name=meter src=../images/PercentBlank.gif !---Flush the page buffer --- cfflush !--- Loop from 0 to 25 and 25 to 50 to 75 to 100 --- cfloop from=0 to 100

RE: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Watts
Does anyone know how to solve the two outstanding issues with using this as an upload progress bar? As far as I can tell there still needs to be a way to obtain the filesize before the upload begins to calculate a completion percentage. And secondly, to my knowledge cffile does not

Re: CFMX CFHTTP test

2003-02-15 Thread Bud
On 2/15/03, Bud penned: cfhttp url=https://www.ups.com/ups.app/xml/Rate; method=POST cfhttpparam type=formfield name=xml value='?xml version=1.0? AccessRequest xml:lang=en-US AccessLicenseNumber/AccessLicenseNumber /AccessRequest' /cfhttp ACK! I don't know how I didn't paste this in there:

Re: CFMX CFHTTP test

2003-02-15 Thread Gary Groomer
I received the following message: 0 Failure Hard 250005 No Access Identification provided Gary - Original Message - From: Bud [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 4:29 PM Subject: Re: CFMX CFHTTP test On 2/15/03, Bud penned: cfhttp

Re: MXDU - Corfield

2003-02-15 Thread Sean A Corfield
Dave Comedian Watts wrote: And, it appears that Sean may have encountered more downs than ups! Yuk, yuk, yuk. I am certainly encountering less Down Under than I expected... Sean ~| Archives:

Re: MXDU - Corfield

2003-02-15 Thread Dick Applebaum
Sean, you mean to say that you were going to Australia, but couldn't go to SF for MAcWorld boo, hiss! (nothing against MXDU or Australians). dick On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 05:02 PM, Sean A Corfield wrote: Dave Comedian Watts wrote: And, it appears that Sean may have

RE: CFMX CFHTTP test

2003-02-15 Thread Chris White
Here is what I got: 0 Failure Hard 250005 No Access Identification provided Chris -Original Message- From: Bud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 7:29 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFMX CFHTTP test On 2/15/03, Bud penned: cfhttp

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Jesse Houwing
Dave Lyons wrote: http://examples.macromedia.com/coldfusion/cfflush/? Works fine here... Jesse ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription:

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
figures, lol oh well basically what ben doom said as well Dave - Original Message - From: Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 7:01 PM Subject: RE: uploading progress bar Does anyone know how to solve the two outstanding issues

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
i just tried again and it still chokes out on me what browser are you using? you know whats funny? If i use IE6 to try and check my hotmail account, i cant get through. But if i use mozzilla its fine. I guess this whole linex deal really has m$ panties in a big bunch Dave

Re: CFMX CFHTTP test

2003-02-15 Thread Bud
On 2/15/03, Gary Groomer penned: I received the following message: 0 Failure Hard 250005 No Access Identification provided Thanks. The problem appears to be with Crystal Tech's server. I can't cfhttp to anything using https. http works fine. -- Bud Schneehagen - Tropical Web Creations

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Dick Applebaum
On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 05:41 PM, Dave Lyons wrote: I guess this whole linex deal really has m$ panties in a big bunch Just what, do you mean by this? Dick ~| Archives:

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
have you been reading anything about how m$ is freaking on linux right now? looks like a lot of people are moving over to it and lindows. Dave - Original Message - From: Dick Applebaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 9:10 PM Subject: Re:

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Dick Applebaum
No I haven't! prejudice showing Couldn't be happier! /prejudice showing Do you have any URLs? TIA Dick On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 06:14 PM, Dave Lyons wrote: have you been reading anything about how m$ is freaking on linux right now? looks like a lot of people are moving over

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
let me see if i can find them have you scene lindows yet? i might go get it this weekend and try it Dave - Original Message - From: Dick Applebaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 9:29 PM Subject: Re: uploading progress bar No I

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
here is one The open-source model sparks concern at Microsoft about its enterprise business. http://eletters1.ziffdavis.com/cgi-bin10/flo/y/eTzm0EpVHn0DSr0uX70Au Dave - Original Message - From: Dave Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Dick Applebaum
No! i thought you were joaking1 Dick On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 06:34 PM, Dave Lyons wrote: let me see if i can find them have you scene lindows yet? i might go get it this weekend and try it Dave - Original Message - From: Dick Applebaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: MXDU (MX DownUnder conference) - 19-20 Feb 2003 - Sydney Australi a

2003-02-15 Thread Kay Smoljak
mark brinkworth wrote: I'll be there!! Me too! Peter Tilbrook wrote: Is anyone else in this list attending the MXDU conference? (http://mxdu.com). Kay Smoljak http://kay.smoljak.com ~| Archives:

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
lol, no kidding here www.lindows.com i thought i read that you can install it next to xp which would be cool to compare them have to say it looks like m$ is in trouble especially for $49 Dave - - Original Message - From: Dick Applebaum [EMAIL

Re: uploading progress bar

2003-02-15 Thread Dick Applebaum
OK, I saw that! It cost less than an XP upgrade. Does it run all the Win desktop apps or just approximates? If Lindows makes sense, does LOX? I have fiddled with KDE -- quite nice, but does any 'Nix desktop approach OS X? Does Windows? Here's some questions I have wondered about: Can you

Lindows was

2003-02-15 Thread Dick Applebaum
OK, I saw that! It cost less than an XP upgrade. Does it run all the Win desktop apps or just approximates? If Lindows makes sense, does LOX? I have fiddled with KDE -- quite nice, but does any 'Nix desktop approach OS X? Does Windows? Here's some questions I have wondered about: Can you

Re: Lindows was

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
not sure, im reading through it all right now. but if i can install it next to xp until the kinks are out, its all good might not be able to though with the nt file system i'd love to see the speed of it currently i have a p4 2.4 ghz with 768 mb rdram and with xp its not all that fast Dave

Re: Lindows was

2003-02-15 Thread Dick Applebaum
I don't have time tonite, but tomorrow I might try installing it on Virtual PC. I paid $249 (or some such) at Best for WinXP. I paid $99 at PCConnection for OS X. The Lindows price looks good! Dick On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 07:43 PM, Dave Lyons wrote: not sure, im reading

Re: Lindows was

2003-02-15 Thread Dick Applebaum
shit! I was going to go to bed! Now I have a challenge! Dick On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 07:54 PM, Dave Lyons wrote: you will have to report how it is Looks like i will need to add a partition to my hard drive and I just reinstalled windows again last night so I may have to wait

RE: Lindows was

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Watts
but I'm sure a lot of people here would like to hear about how it works! I'm sure a lot of people don't want to hear about it either, though, and it's pretty off-topic for a CF programming list. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202)

Re: Lindows was

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
lol u cant go to bed until hockey is over! Dave - - Original Message - From: Dick Applebaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 11:01 PM Subject: Re: Lindows was shit! I was going to go to bed!

Re: Lindows was

2003-02-15 Thread Dick Applebaum
There doesn't seem to be a trial version -- i am not going to piss away $129 plus my time on this! Dick On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 07:54 PM, Dave Lyons wrote: you will have to report how it is Looks like i will need to add a partition to my hard drive and I just reinstalled

Re: Lindows was

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
lol sorry dave sometimes get doing to much at once and forget part of being blonde Dave - - Original Message - From: Dave Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 11:09 PM Subject: RE: Lindows was

Re: Lindows was

2003-02-15 Thread Dick Applebaum
On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 08:09 PM, Dave Watts wrote: I'm sure a lot of people don't want to hear about it either, though, and it's pretty off-topic for a CF programming list. Yes, and no -- some large percentage of CF sites are hosted on Linux servers -- some large percentage

RE: Lindows was

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Watts
I'm sure a lot of people don't want to hear about it either, though, and it's pretty off-topic for a CF programming list. Yes, and no -- some large percentage of CF sites are hosted on Linux servers -- some large percentage of desktops accessing CF sites are on Win servers.

Re: MXDU - Corfield

2003-02-15 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Saturday, Feb 15, 2003, at 17:09 US/Pacific, Dick Applebaum wrote: Sean, you mean to say that you were going to Australia, but couldn't go to SF for MAcWorld boo, hiss! And in both cases, work pressures meant I couldn't attend either event. Sean

RE: Lindows was

2003-02-15 Thread mtangorre
ditto -Original Message- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sat 2/15/2003 11:09 PM To: CF-Talk Cc: Subject: RE: Lindows was but I'm sure a lot of people here would like to hear

Re: Lindows was

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
i guess thats why we all have opinions:) but i do agree its not a direct cf topic and I got carried away, already said sorry but i'd still like to know, lol Dave - Original Message - From: Tangorre; Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003

Re: Lindows was

2003-02-15 Thread samcfug
Don't apologize, I consider it very pertinent to our group = Douglas White group Manager mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.samcfug.org = - Original Message - From: Dave Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL

Re: MXDU (MX DownUnder conference) - 19-20 Feb 2003 - Sydney Australi a

2003-02-15 Thread mark brinkworth
I'm catching the red eye there (indicating a degree of cheapness on my part!), so whether I'll be awake is another matter. Just hoping its one of the free drink flights :) --- Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mark brinkworth wrote: I'll be there!! Me too! Peter Tilbrook wrote:

Re: Lindows was

2003-02-15 Thread Dave Lyons
sometime u just have too personally, i feel the same as well but also being a newbie its not wise to burn bridges yet ;) Dave - Original Message - From: samcfug [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 2:49 AM Subject: Re: Lindows was Don't