Brian,
On 7/3/06, Brian Rinaldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to disagree with you, obviously you know FarCry far better than I, but
my email was based upon my experiences with prior and existing versions of
FarCry (and was not a criticism). Nonetheless, I do take a bit of issue with
calling
On Sunday 02 July 2006 16:09, Claude Schneegans wrote:
Just an example: support for CF 4.5 or 5 if your server is under CFMX
and there is
no chance you go back to a lower version.
So what ? That's not a negative point of the framework is it ? As long as it
runs on what you've got, and better
On a shared host, CrystalTech ... Just running a simple query on a page... what
does this mean? I've replaced the real DSN name with mydsnname
Error Occurred While Processing Request
Security: The requested template has been denied access to mydsnname
Thanks,
Will
It means that CT has sandboxed off your datasource. Get them to add it
back to your account.
On 7/3/06, Will Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a shared host, CrystalTech ... Just running a simple query on a page...
what does this mean? I've replaced the real DSN name with mydsnname
It means that CT has sandboxed off your datasource. Get them to add it
back to your account.
Thanks a ton James!
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:245278
Archives:
I would imagine this is a pain to debug, because any errors will be in the
compiled pages (which u can't view I presume if they are compiled to memory)
not in the code you actually wrote.
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Strutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2006 04:05
To:
Hello
,
I got this messsage
You tried to access the developer edition from a disallowed IP
(xx.xx.xx.xx). The developer edition can only be accessed from 127.0.0.1
and two additional IP addresses. The additional IP addresses are:
xx.xx.xx.xx,xx.xx.xx.xx
The IP nr of my the machine running CFMX
Restart CF.
Ade
-Original Message-
From: Marc Bakker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2006 11:49
To: CF-Talk
Subject: how to change allowed IP addresses for the developer edition?
Hello
,
I got this messsage
You tried to access the developer edition from a disallowed IP
Restart CFMX, it will clear the IP adresses and allow the next two machines
to connect.
On 7/3/06, Marc Bakker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
,
I got this messsage
You tried to access the developer edition from a disallowed IP
(xx.xx.xx.xx). The developer edition can only be accessed from
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=tn_17832
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:245283
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription:
So you are saying sometimes the title is right, and sometimes not?
Verity tries to find the title from the metadata of the document when
indexing. Did you check the documents with bad titles to make sure
that they are set up right?
As for your second question, yes, using CF7. Simply add the
You restart coldfusion
-Original Message-
From: Marc Bakker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2006 11:49
To: CF-Talk
Subject: how to change allowed IP addresses for the developer edition?
Hello
,
I got this messsage
You tried to access the developer edition from a disallowed IP
Has anyone found a way to get this plugin to work with the new Eclipse?
http://vssplugin.sourceforge.net/
Bob
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:245286
Archives:
Stop imagining and actually try it.
On 7/3/06, Snake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would imagine this is a pain to debug, because any errors will be in the
compiled pages (which u can't view I presume if they are compiled to
memory)
not in the code you actually wrote.
-Original
Geoff,
Actually I brought up FourQ because Charlie Arehart had someone present it
as a Reactor alternative at an Atlanta CFUG meeting and he asked why it
wasn't on the open-source list. I told him it was because I could not find a
seperate download any longer (at this point in time, I don't list
So what ? That's not a negative point of the framework is it ?
Sure it is: this, and some other features you don't need, make the code
more difficult to read.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
Nope. Easier to debug.
If the error is in a parsed file, its in your xml. Otherwise, since all
other FB fuses are cfincluded, any errors in them show up as usual.
You can always look at the parsed files, they are located in the parsed
directory and named as circuit.fuseaction.cfm
Sandra
First, it's not language specific. This is the weakest point because not
many people care whether or not they can move their controller layer between
different languages, but it sounds nice.
You're taking the words right out of my mouth ;-/
Second, [...] the limited XML syntax
forces you to
On Monday 03 July 2006 14:26, Claude Schneegans wrote:
So what ? That's not a negative point of the framework is it ?
Sure it is: this, and some other features you don't need, make the code
more difficult to read.
The whole point of a (good) framework is you don't need to read the framework
Unfortunately I have a full-time job, so I don't have the luxury of just
taking time off at a whim to play with new frameworks.
Things like this have to wait until I have some free time.
snake
-Original Message-
From: Greg Luce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2006 13:55
To:
Claude,
You've tried to make your point with frameworks, but you haven't made any
factual statements. It's fine if you don't want to use frameworks, but if you
want anyone else to not use them then I think you need to document any issues
with them as opposed to things like Includes CF 4.5 and
Robert Everland III wrote:
Has anyone found a way to get this plugin to work with the new
Eclipse? http://vssplugin.sourceforge.net/
Follow the installation instructions for 3.1 and start eclipse with -clean.
Jochem
~|
I think my main issue was that I didn't get the SDK. If installing the SDK
doesn't work I will try the -clean, thanks.
bob
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:245296
Archives:
Tom,
All of the new frameworks use CFC, so they won't even work on CF 4.5 or CF 5.
One of the frameworks I know , fusebox 3, used a cfswitch in the main file and
included a specific framework depending on which server you were on. You didn't
need this logic, you could just include the correct
I wrote something exactly like this. It sends out a single email per person
each time new job is added in a category they have saved.
I don't save anything relating to when the user was mailed.
!//--
andy matthews
web developer
certified advanced coldfusion programmer
Brian Rinaldi wrote:
Geoff,
Actually I brought up FourQ because Charlie Arehart had someone present it
as a Reactor alternative at an Atlanta CFUG meeting and he asked why it
wasn't on the open-source list. I told him it was because I could not find a
seperate download any longer (at this point
Claude Snake,
We know you both either don't have the time or just don't think it's worth your
time to code using frameworks. I think it's time for you to stop contributing
to threads on them since you have no actually looked at any of the code in
frameworks. This thread started as a
Charlie,
Thanks for clarifying...my wording was definitely awkward...it happens
frequently on these lists ;) That actually didn't start any debate - I just
took the opportunity to ask about whether FourQ was available seperately
within my response, which has nothing to do really with whether one
On Monday 03 July 2006 15:15, Robert Everland III wrote:
All of the new frameworks use CFC, so they won't even work on CF 4.5 or CF
5. One of the frameworks I know , fusebox 3, used a cfswitch in the main
file and included a specific framework depending on which server you were
on. You didn't
I'm working on an app that pulls together a client's data for a given
period of time, and produces a forecast for what future data might
look like. I've been using the CFLIB forecast() function written by
James Stevenson, but am interested in hearing about any other tools
that are either
I am aware of the documents at the Adobe/Macromedia Knowledgebase about
securing ColdFusion. However, I wonder if there is another definitive
checklist or document somewhere else? I'm mostly concerned with
configuration of the servers (coldfusion/IIS) even though I realize
application design is
There was no logic in the framework file that had
different syntax based on what CF version you were on ,
There could have been, and you would never have known :-)
Actually, because the code is open I was able to browse through the source and
see for myself.
Bob
I think it's time for you to stop contributing to threads on them
since you have no actually looked at any of the code in frameworks.
Wrong, I had to work on an application developed under FB, so I had to
learn it.
I know enough about it, and other solutions, to be able to say that FB
is
bob,
I do use frameworks thanks, in fact I have written my own.
I have also used FB3 and Model Glue and am currently looking at coldspring
and Reactor.
I have never ever at any point said I do not like frameworks or that they
are bad, in fact I advocate them.
So I have no idea why your directing
On 7/3/06, Claude Schneegans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second, [...] the limited XML syntax
forces you to stand back and think about your application.
OK, so it's better because it's limited?
Yeah. Believe it or not.
It makes sure your application controller isn't doing anything but than
I was referring to this comment:
Unfortunately I have a full-time job, so I don't have the luxury of just
taking time off at a whim to play with new frameworks.
Things like this have to wait until I have some free time.
snake
Stop imagining and actually try it.
Bob
Trying to get BlogCFC 5 up and running with a SQL Server 2k5 db (up on
a shared host).
Everything's installed and set up, but on hitting the site for the
first time, i'm getting the following error:
The incoming tabular data stream (TDS) remote procedure call (RPC)
protocol stream is incorrect.
Anyone wanna recommend a framework for me?
;-)
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:245311
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription:
Sometimes I feel like I'm watching a soap opera, but more entertaining.
All My Frameworks
On 7/3/06, Jeff Small [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone wanna recommend a framework for me?
;-)
~|
Message:
Bob,
Believe it or jobs are real.
Sorry if your single, have no kids and/or are unemployed/on welfare, but we
can't all live life the way you do I'm afraid, some of us have bigger
responsibilities in our lives than coldfusion, like feeding the kids and
paying the mortgage.
I'm very happy for you
If you're hard-core OO, look at Mach-II and Model-Glue. If you don't
do OO and don't want to start, look at Fusebox. If you like OO, but
don't want to go for broke, look at Fusebox with an OO-ish backend.
If you don't want to pay the performance cost for the flexibility of
an implicit invocation
Man, do you ever look and see that you're the one who's always in the
controversial topics on this board? You seriously need to do a
self-analysis and re-evaluate why this is. Many of us see it, funny how
you don't.
Snake wrote:
Bob,
Believe it or jobs are real.
Sorry if your single,
Snake,
I said nothing deragatory to you, I asked you to not post on this topic because
what you had to say wasn't relative to the question asked.
As for the issues you addressed to me publicly I will address them publicly.
Sorry if your single, have no kids and/or are unemployed/on welfare,
Yeah, I have often seen it at the bottom. I just hesitated to do so because
I remember reading that you should put it between the head and body tags in
order for google to detect it... Maybe that was an ld knowledgebasee
article, or maybe it was just for verification fo the script, but now its
Bob,
I've had better luck with ESSTP (http://esstp.sourceforge.net/).
YMMV
-- Mike Wolfe
-Original Message-
From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 8:50 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Eclipse 3.2 VSS 1.61
Has anyone found a way to get this
I've not had a problem.
What issues are you having?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Wolfe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2006 20:58
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Eclipse 3.2 VSS 1.61
Bob,
I've had better luck with ESSTP (http://esstp.sourceforge.net/).
YMMV
-- Mike Wolfe
Reposted now that Flex 2 and CF 7.0.2 are availablethis three-part
presentation, Dean Harmon of the ColdFusion team presents and instructs on the
use of the ColdFusion FlexBuilder 2 Extension features:
http://www.dcooper.org
Damon
Also, one of the main benefits of the XML is that the program structure and
flow is described there, and not among the rest of the CF code. This enables
tools like Fusebuilder, fuseminder, etc. that can document and modify the
flow+structure of the application programmatically.
On 7/3/06,
We don't use JNDI internally, but we do allow access to and use of J2EE-server
registered JNDI datasources from CFML. Sounds like you want to go the other
way, though. Nothing documented or supported that I'm aware of...
Damon
All,
I've run into a situation where I have some java code
Charlie Griefer wrote:
This is a shared host, so I don't have access to the CF Admin. is
there another way to determine this?
Not if your host has a proper configuration. If they don't you can use the
Admin API, CreateObject(blahblahblah servicefactory) and cffile for
neo-query.xml.
I know in uploading a file with CFFILe you specify the file field of the
file to upload. Dows this mean that you can use file uploads with AJAX?
Thanks, I'm hoping someone knows a way around this so I can do file uploads
in AJAX . Thanks for your help and time.
B V wrote:
I know in uploading a file with CFFILe you specify the file field of the
file to upload. Dows this mean that you can use file uploads with AJAX?
Yes. Just tie an onblur to the control that submits the form to a page that
returns a HTTP 204.
Jochem
Kev,
No problems, really. Just some discomfort with how vssplugin handles
check-out/in. It feels like the person who created the plugin was more
familiar with CVS than VSS.
ESSTP just seems to work more like VSS.
-- Mike
-Original Message-
From: Kev McCabe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't think you can do file uploads with AJaX. I believe it's a
security issue. At least, I've never found a way. Not using a POST
method, anyway. I've tried using Prototype and had no luck
whatsoever. Working with input-file is one of the most secured,
anti-scripting operations in the
The only way I've seen to do this using traditional web methods
(i.e. no AJaX, etc.) is to use CFFLUSH in conjunction with client-side
JavaScript to perform the redirect.
[... server-side processing ...]
script type=text/javascript
location.href = '/redirection/target/path/to/page.htm';
Well, I guess you could do it the traditional way (e.g iframes) and set the
Target to _top That's what they USED to do, but the main reason that I
want this is so I can show a spinner thingy that says loading... please be
patient
On 7/3/06, Rob Wilkerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't
Regarding file uploads.I was reading Firefox security
vulnerabilities, and supposedly there was a vulnerability where someone
could set the value predifined to a known (common) file on the person's
server and then upload it and steal it without the person's consent. Scary.
Luckily I have
If you read the thread, You will note that I never actually said anything to
bob at all until he had a dig at me.
Maybe I shouldn't retaliate, maybe I should just ignore people like him and
not let them wind me up, but hey that's me, I have a short fuse. As it goes
I have started blacklisting
Greg,
All I can suggest is that you get a stopwatch out and time how long it takes
to send a few emails, then time how long it takes to learn and implement and
test say Mach-II or FB5 and compare the difference.
You will then have answered your own question.
HTH
Snake
-Original
AJAX is your friend here.
When the form is submitted use AJAX to send it to a stand alone process,
then redirect the page to where you want to go. The action will then take
place in the background.
Of course the user will not see the results of their action, so it depends
if that matters to you or
Thanks guys for saving me several hours of having to go through FB5 myself
to find this out.
At least there are some people on here that take the time to write useless
responses rather than just being rude.
snake
-Original Message-
From: David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July
I would be careful on doing that on a shared host though. You wont be very
popular and it could effectively breaks their TC's.
Playing around with the cfadmin settings can easily break other peoples
sites on the servers.
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry useful, I meant useful :-)
-Original Message-
From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July 2006 23:56
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Framework suggestions
Thanks guys for saving me several hours of having to go through FB5 myself
to find this out.
At least there are some people
Well, I guess you could do it the traditional way (e.g iframes) and set the
Target to _top That's what they USED to do, but the main reason that I
want this is so I can show a spinner thingy that says loading... please be
patient
You wouldn't even have to post the file to an IFRAME to do
Cool,
Never seen ESSTP May have to install tomorrow while in the office, if its
more like VSS may help a few people I know that are having issues using it
correctly :-) and stop _BACKUP's gr lol
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Michael Wolfe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 July
Something to keep in mind is that neither of these plugins have been updated
for quite a while, so you use them with new Eclipse versions at your own
risk.
-- Mike
-Original Message-
From: Kev McCabe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 8:51 PM
To: CF-Talk
66 matches
Mail list logo
