Gerald, I used to use CFFORM, and it quickly got outdated as HTML and CSS
and Javascript and jquery moved on. These days HTML5 is the go with
CSS3. CFFORM doesnt produce those. Therefore things like client side
validation, placeholder text, cross-browser issues, mobile devices are
all
The cfide has caused so many security issues that it is best to simply
avoid using it all and do not even have it in your site.
The other issue is that you are reliant on this virtual dir. I have seen
many customers who were oblivious to this requirement when they moved their
hosting and as a
Does anyone have an update program that can update a text string in all
tables/rows/columns of an MS SQL data base?
Need to do a global text string replace on several sites. Any help appreciated.
Thanks,
Robert Harrison
Director of Interactive Services
Austin Williams
Advertising I
On 3/3/2014 10:39 PM, Gerald Guido wrote:
Why are people so vehemently opposed so to CFForm?
Many TIA in advance,
Curious-G!
--
Gerald Guido
Twitter https://twitter.com/CozmoTrouble
Blarg http://www.myinternetisbroken.com
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gerald.guido.9
you mean like this
http://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/1555/sql-server-find-and-replace-values-in-all-tables-and-all-text-columns/
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Robert Harrison
rob...@austin-williams.comwrote:
Does anyone have an update program that can update a text string in all
Take a look at the sys.tables and sys.columns tables in your SQL database.
You should be able to write a couple of cursors to loop over each and just
print out the SQL to run separately (or you can get fancy and generate the
SQL statement and run it via EXEC sp_executeSQL functions). I don't
Yes, I do mean like that, but I was really hoping someone had it already
written up in CF with a tested procedure they would be willing to share.
I was able to find several downloads for PHP, but nothing for CF.
Thanks
Robert Harrison
Director of Interactive Services
Austin Williams
Actually, that's the kind of operation that you'd not want to perform in CF
(or PHP or any other database client). Unless you truly need all that data
within a CF page for some other reason, you shouldn't be sending it all
back and forth between DBMS and CF.
--- Ben
(Sent from my newest Android
Actually, that's the kind of operation that you'd not want to perform in CF (or
PHP or any other database client). Unless you truly need all that data within a
CF page for some other reason, you shouldn't be sending it all back and forth
between DBMS and CF.
... I'm going to do this locally,
I think it is acceptable to let CF do some things for you. For example, I
don't want to go to Java and write the code to handle database calls. Could
I? Sure. (Ok, I lie.) But is it a good use of my time? Probably not. I let
CF handle that aspect for me and it has never been a problem.
On the
Why are people so vehemently opposed so to CFForm?
Mainly for historical reason. I don't know how is CFForm nowadays, but when it
first appeared in CF, it was really week, missing a lot of essential features,
and every message coming out of it was only in English, making it not an option
for
I have used cf since v4 and it has always had both client side and server
side validation
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:45 PM, wrote:
Why are people so vehemently opposed so to CFForm?
Mainly for historical reason. I don't know how is CFForm nowadays, but
when it first appeared in CF, it was
I have used cf since v4 and it has always had both client side and server
side validation
Ditto... but for client side validation I seldom use CFFORM unless it is a very
simple form. CFFORM is good for required fields and for some validation of data
types entered in fields. It falls short
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Gerald Guido wrote:
My bad: Why are people so vehemently opposed to CFForm?
Rule of thumb: Anything that is built into CF and spits out Java,
Javascript, Flash, or any other client side parsed in the browser stuff
should be avoided. Adobe has a roughly 18
That may have been the case at one time. HOWEVER with HTML 5 and such jQuery
plugins as jQuery.Validate, even that argument in favour of CFFORM is no longer
valid. With HTML 5 (assuming that the client browser can handle it) even
required fields are much easier to do than with CF now. About
On Mar 4, 2014 5:40 AM, Gerald Guido wrote:
Why are people so vehemently opposed so to CFForm?
Because it will only get you so far. And once you want to go further,
you'll find that you can't. So then you have to go back, rip out cfform and
replace it with something else. At which point you
And btw - don't forget - there is a whole project dedicated to helping you
replace these items. (So instead of just saying Dont Do X, we can do Do
This) -
https://github.com/cfjedimaster/ColdFusion-UI-the-Right-Way
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Jochem van Dieten joch...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Nick Gleason n.glea...@citysoft.com wrote:
Pete,
Much appreciated. I guess where I'm being a bit of a dunce is that in your
example, if a malicious url.query variable was passed in by a hacker,
wouldn't the display only be available on that single request?
I agree with Ben...this is something that you should be running in SQL
Management Studio. ColdFusion is not meant to run this kind of stuff
(unless you set the timeout on your templates to 0). The code attached
below will loop over all of the user tables, and then loop over all of the
text
Thanks Graham. Unfortunately creating accounts in GMail is not something our
users will want to do, nor managing their email addresses in the group account
something we want to do. Thanks for the ideas but I think we will use Exchange
to do the ListServ and CF to manage the subscriptions and
Thank you all for taking the time to answer. It has been most
enlightening.I must say that assumptions made were more interesting than
the answers themselves.
G!
--
Gerald Guido
Twitter https://twitter.com/CozmoTrouble
Blarg http://www.myinternetisbroken.com
Facebook
21 matches
Mail list logo
