I think you can use the OnRequest method (be sure to read up on it) and
anything declared there will be fine as local variables just like
Application.cfm.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 1:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
If it's perl, just write identical functionality in both CF and perl and
present it to your interested parties.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 7:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs LAMP
This was actually my original
Isn't that a self fulfilling process?
There's more developers for LAMP, therefore you should push/agree to LAMP.
That results in another potential loss of a client to a CFML based solution.
This in turn, results in the corollary argument that There's a much larger
client base for LAMP. I'd
What I am observing is an increasing number of participants on this list (CF
list) advocating PHP instead of CF, without even the benefit of knowing the
total requirements of a given project.
Which potentially results in the self fulfilling process that was the point
of my previous
-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 1 juni 2005 12:51
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs LAMP
What I am observing is an increasing number of participants on this list
(CF
list) advocating PHP instead of CF, without even the benefit of knowing
the
total requirements
I think so, better throw a comment in there...
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 2:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Application.cfm
e, doesnt an EMPTY application.cfm file barf?
tony
On 6/1/05, Charlie Griefer [EMAIL
!--- I am because I am ---
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 5:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Application.cfm
who would put up a blank application.cfm without putting in a comment
describing why it's there?
Any lone
American City Business Journals
704-973-1045
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 8:15 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs LAMP
I'm certainly not taking offense, I'm observing a pattern of behavour.
We also aren't
Why not just replace the P, everything else should be fine.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 1:26 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CF vs LAMP
We have a client that is trying to decide whether to go with my company or
another company.
If you aren't actually using client variables, I suggest changing your
default to cookie (unless of course you are using a lot of cookie values
directly).
Additionally, if you do go with the database storage solution, I would be
aware that if you have a single database for all of your apps for
I don't know the answer to your final question, but one thing you can do is
set your default client variable storage to cookie.
Personally I agree with Sean and try to avoid client variable usage
altogether.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Coleman, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Congratulations!
Looking forward to helping out with your migration questions :P
There's a great manual that comes with 7 (maybe only in pdf) that talks
about the migration process and considerations.
- Calvin
On 5/24/05 2:44 AM, mike hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks in part to your
Isn't it also appropriate to define and communicate the value that is
possible (or not) with the additional features/performance of one product
over another to the business?
In other words, aside from features that 'developers want to play with',
there are features and benefits that may be
How about this question ?
What is the compelling reason to migrate to 6.1 instead of 7?
On 5/18/05 2:23 PM, Damien McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another way of looking at it...
You go to buy a car. You're, e.g., looking at the Toyota Prius (Hi
Sean) and decide to get it. Lets say the
I would definitely entertain using sandbox security to limit the database
access, I trust that you're already using it to limit cffile access?
On 5/18/05 10:10 PM, Jamie Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At this point in the discussion I'd like to invite anyone who knows of a
shared host WITH A
The items that have to be disabled completely keep me off of shared hosting.
Not having cfobject/createobject in CFMX is like running a race with your
nikes tied together dangling around your neck instead of on your feet!
- Calvin
On 5/18/05 10:21 PM, James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There are quite a few performance differences. Do you do a lot of cfmail?
- Calvin
On 5/19/05 1:48 PM, Ken Ketsdever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are looking at moving up to MX7 from MX6.1 Standard. How would you sell
the idea of moving from Standard to Enterprise? What are the compelling
of CFMAIL with time. Including an application
to send out 25,000 e-mail based newsletters at least once a month.
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 11:50 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Enterprise Edition vs. CF Standard Edition
The pain to move to CFMX 6.1 or CFMX 7 from anything pre-CFMX will be almost
precisely the same...
- Calvin
On 5/18/05 11:25 AM, Connie DeCinko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean paying $1299 twice is not a good enough reason?
-Original Message-
From: mike hanson [mailto:[EMAIL
I recently participated in the conversion of around 100 sites/applications
to CFMX 7 from CF 5.
It was a fairly painless process and it was definitely worth skipping CFMX
6.1
I've worked with CF since 3, and worked with each version very close to
release, including 6.0, and I would definitely
I like this plan.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 6:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: getting the record I just inserted
I do something similar to what Lorne does, although I use a UUID so
that there is NO chance of collision
Not always, and also there's often some neat gems of capabilities hidden
there.
For example the one for CFMX 6 had a nifty regular expression tester for
CFMX in it...
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 9:04 AM
To:
Those bound, printed copies cost $150 for the set. I'm thinking sub $40 per
book for the WACK and Advanced WACK is a better deal!
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 9:58 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: I truly hate Ben Forta
For what
)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 10:18 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: I truly hate Ben Forta
If you have a licensed copy of CF they are free (used to be)
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 May 2005 15:18
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: I
Since they are two different products, I'd rather see CFMX in schools.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 10:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX: Dissed by Breeze and FlashLite?
I'll just throw in my .02 and say I
I could see someone using the server scope for this
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 9:23 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Performance
The latter, it would be totally unmanageable otherwise...
-Original
However, that doesn't mean that CS programs shouldn't include web
application technology and methodology, even if only as elective.
I think part of the point is that web development languages are already in
play at colleges and university, and as CF developers, we would like to see
CF be the
I thought he said that the majority of new corporate apps are going to be
web apps...
I could agree with that prediction.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 10:56 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX: Dissed by Breeze and FlashLite?
I completely disagree. There's never a good enough reason to start throwing
around profanity and insulting people on a list intended for a group of
professionals.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Sherwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 11:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject:
Because... it's not a true development language?
-Original Message-
From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 3:37 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX: Dissed by Breeze and FlashLite?
Thank you, but do other people think CF would fit in the unit as a true
Effectively, you seem to be saying that education establishments should be
teaching CF instead of PHP?
-Original Message-
From: Rick Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 10:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX: Dissed by Breeze and FlashLite?
Micha,
With all due
There's that 'real' thing again.
-Original Message-
From: Damien McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 5:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX: Dissed by Breeze and FlashLite?
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's
I agree, make sure you express that one here:
http://www.macromedia.com/go/wish/
I would think your best bet is to put it under Dreamweaver.
Thanks,
Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 7:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OOP
I did see the promo badge for CFMX 7 during release time, but what was
disappointing was that CFMX 7 didn't get the full FMA for the week of
release, or even the day of release.
AFAIK, nothing else was released or 'new' at the same time. The full ads I
rotated through were for things that had ads
That'd be nice!
I've noticed that the cfeclipse group has been quiet lately...
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Phillip P Rutherford II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 8:04 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: cfeclipse and cfmx7
any chance there will be an update that
, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed that the cfeclipse group has been quiet lately...
That's because they all have day jobs too...
There's been a lot of work on the dictionary machinery (which is what
drives tag insight) in preparation for supporting more features
That's where CF missed out on some marketing.
What makes Java on Websphere better than CFMX on Websphere?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Montgomery Chris Contr AFSFC/SFPA
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 4:05 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX: Dissed by Breeze
Probably not, however the perception that ColdFusion is not a 'big league'
application server is more prevalent than some might think.
Maybe part of that 'big league'ness could be improved by being big on
Macromedia's front page now and again?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Sean
Um, that happened with the first response...
-Original Message-
From: David Critchley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 5:58 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX: Dissed by Breeze and FlashLite?
Can we end this thread... It's turning into a Soap.
So to quote a past
Something they are doing appears to be working quite well.
-Original Message-
From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 6:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX: Dissed by Breeze and FlashLite?
A totally different comparison. Comparing a Microsoft-Horny
Try cfeclipse, great stuff there :)
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 7:55 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OOP development tools
Are there any plugins for Homesite+ or Eclipse or some other tool out there
that can provide code insight for cfc's?
I happen to agree that it would have been nice to CFMX 7 featured as the
primary banner during release week.
I also think the post is at least somewhat topical. Certainly more topical
than some of the responses.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think there's entirely too much of this kind of thing on this list.
I would think our community should be a bit more professional.
-Original Message-
From: Irvin Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 12:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX: Dissed by Breeze and
For some reason I was thinking that CF should be targeted at business users
as well...
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Aebig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 1:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX: Dissed by Breeze and FlashLite?
Well said. Also, considering
Which version of CF? And what is the limitation of Verity that you are
running up against?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Emerle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 8:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Coveo Enterprise Search
Anyone had any experience integrating
Fusetalk is a nice solution for the talk to each other part of your
challenge, and the pro version is pretty nice, and not significantly
expensive.
For meeting minutes based on a calendar, and even memos based on a calendar,
how about a modification of BlogCFC?
Tuck FckEditor in there and
Fusetalk Pro can integrate with a SQL database for user access
(userid/password) and probably other solutions as well.
Is there something additional you're interested in as far as 'talking' goes?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
You can wrap their site around both solutions so that to the user it is a
seamless transition from one to the other.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:46 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Any commercial CF products that could do
So what's the impetus to be aggressive about this solution? Just out of
curiosity...
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Damien McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 11:55 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Any commercial CF products that could do this?
There's an
Are you using Session variables?
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 1:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CF 7 on WebSphere - what's the beef with Clustering?
We're (finally!) considering upgrading our largeish collection of CF 4.5 apps
Here's the test scenario.
Both of the below files live in the same directory.
Result:
An error which states, Not text elements left
If I remove the style attribute, it works fine.
If I change the style attribute to yellow, it works fine.
If I move the mypie.xml file to the styles
Has anyone successfully used this feature?
http://livedocs.macromedia.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/1431.htm
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and
Any takers or thoughts on this?
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 3:58 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Cfchart, Webcharts, style attribute
Is this working for anyone? All I seem to get is an error that says Not
text elements left
I
Is this working for anyone? All I seem to get is an error that says Not
text elements left
I copied the yellow_pie.xml chart from the cfusionpath/charting/styles
directory to my application directory.
I've got the following tags:
cfchart
cfchartseries type=pie
The only bad is on a shared hosting environment that I can think of off the
top of my head.
Otherwise both ways are equally valid.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Connie DeCinko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 3:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Application Scope
Keep in mind that while M.Dinowitz did a lot of great work in creating and
maintaining this list, a lot of the value comes from the contributors, some
of which don't garner much value from the list (from all appearances), and
provide a great deal more than they give.
You would be effectively
One thing about this I would do differently would be use descriptive labels:
labels
helloHello/hello
/labels
and then a corresponding spanish one...
labels
helloHola/hello
/labels
So that the text in my code could read a bit clearer:
#labels.hello# #session.usernmae#,
Just as I
Resource bundle property files.
Java i18n applications often use this solution and there are a number of
solutions that support interfacing with them.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 5:47 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re:
The downside of a fee is that then folks not familiar with HOF, and there
are quite a few, may never gain that understanding of the value.
Just something to think about.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 11:48 AM
To:
Not to mention the OnError event in Application.cfc
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 1:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Site (not Server) - wide Error Handler
And of course, you can have different .cfm error
A community is a strange and fragile thing, not exactly related to numbers.
The loss of contributors such as those mentioned may very likely have an
undesirable effect on the make-up of our community.
I would point out that I wouldn't like my words to link to content that I
didn't expressly
Heck, I've met pretty decent developers who have only a marginal
understanding of web servers.
I don't think it is unreasonable to expect that many designers have little
to no practical knowledge of web servers either.
Having done a website doesn't necessarily expose you to web server
technology
Homesite has been gone...
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 5:01 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: macromedia and Adobe?!
Yep, say goodbye to...
Freehand, Fireworks, Homesite etc
It is not a good omen for CF.
I fail to see what is wrong with Flashpaper, it has a smaller footprint and
can be easily embedded in pages, and is supported by more browsers than PDF
is.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Keith Gaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 11:28 AM
To: CF-Talk
I actually expect some of this.
-Original Message-
From: Kerry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 12:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: macromedia and Adobe?!
Well, my boss is nervous about CF now, looks like we're moving to a pure
Java environment...
-Original
Aye, they both have challenges, but I think Flashpaper has a place.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 11:48 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Bloomberg article
Calvin Ward wrote:
I fail to see what is wrong with Flashpaper
FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt) is typically created by lack of
information, that anyone would be surprised that folks won't be scared is
what is really surprising, or not really.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005
You've said that several times. Adobe Reader, PDF, it's all the same to the
average end user. Do you think that the average end user hunts down the
'other' PDF readers out there to view a PDF? I don't.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Keith Gaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Note: Homesite+ is already dead.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 2:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: macromedia and Adobe?!
-Original Message-
From: Kym Kovan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 18,
I agree Micha, and it certainly didn't help that during significant CF
events (such as the newest version - 7) Macromedia didn't even bother to let
CF have the top banner on their website, for example.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 3:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: macromedia and Adobe?!
On 4/18/05, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note: Homesite+ is already dead.
- Calvin
according to whom? cfstudio is dead, but im not sure homesite+ is?
--
tony
Tony Weeg
macromedia
...on a feeding tube, yes...but not quite dead yet :)
On 4/18/05, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, buy it directly and show me how you do it.
Alternatively, can you show me the product page link here:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/ ?
How about the developer center page here
Nope, that isn't HomeSite+.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 4:05 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: macromedia and Adobe?!
Alternatively, can you show me the product page link here:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/ ?
There's this one:
http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/server_archive/articles/white_papers/allair
ebusinessplatform1.pdf
Of course Flex has one:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/flex/whitepapers/pdf/flex15_tech_wp.pdf
Interestingly enough, Flex is going to have a CLR based version...
- Calvin
And the other alternative is the reality that Adobe certainly seems more
litigious...
http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/28/2810macro
..html
Wonder if that could spell hard times for the alternate CF 'engines'?
-Original Message-
From: Gert Franz
I really like the way you put this:
MM hasn't just shown vision for its products, but for the internet, and how
the user will interact with the internet. Thats what I love about Flex, it's
the MM guys said how SHOULD it work, and then built the language around it
(but that's another discussion
I recall that it is off by default as well. I personally think it should be
on by default.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 7:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Event Gateway's and runaway threads...
On 4/14/05,
Took me about 10 minutes to write my first Asynch Gateway. Took another 30
to tune it, and a lot of that was being happy with the appearance of logging
and email messages.
All it was though was a cfindex that generates status messages via cflog or
optionally cfmail, but I love it.
- Calvin
For flexibility, how about this: ListFirst(ListSort(numbers,'numeric'))
-Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Ewok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 9:10 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Max value of 3 variables
Max() should do it if you're not going to eventually have more
I tend to prefer that method...
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Ewok [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 9:15 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Conditional CFInclude
It will only include one.
You could always take the old asp method too :)
cfif somecondition
cfset
in the
list?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 10:44 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Max value of 3 variables
Or #arrayMax(listToArray(numbers))#
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday
I thought CFMX 7 still required that?
-Original Message-
From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 11:07 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: sorry, back to JVM/GC for a moment
You know there are so many little things like that in CF I just keep
coding and
http://127.0.0.1/internal/sample/test.cfm?wsdl is probably what you need.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 6:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF on J2EE CFC path
Thanks Dave..figured it out a few minutes after
How about just using cfsetting... inside the Event Gateway CFC itself?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Paul Kenney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 9:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Event Gateway's and runaway threads...
This global setting is something you
If you do, keep in mind that Soundex is intended for single words, not
phrases, sentences or paragraphs, etc.
Although, using that, how would you tell the user what the actual word found
was?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Justin D. Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Actually both situations are true.
An IDE can be universally difficult to work with or have terrible
performance, and these will be measurable differences that apply to
everyone. For example, in Dreamweaver MX 2004 (patched from 2004), often the
characters on screen lag behind my keystrokes and
I'm getting a
Bad envelope tag: html
Message from a webservice I'm trying to access.
Has anyone seen that before?
- Calvin
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
hitting the server's
url directly in a browser to see what you get.
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Web Service question
I'm getting a
Bad envelope tag: html
Message from a webservice I'm
Weird, where are the submit buttons?
-Original Message-
From: Steven Erat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 3:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Load Testing ColdFusion Applications Using SeeFusion
The Online ColdFusion Meetup Group invites you to a virtual
presentation
Bah, for some reason our proxy was blocking it... nm
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 4:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Load Testing ColdFusion Applications Using SeeFusion
Weird, where are the submit buttons?
-Original
I'd really like this feature in CFEclipse also
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:29 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: What's your setup for multiple developers
I would like to use CFEclipse, but I got really used
It is true that isn't IDEs that make the developer, however an IDE can get
in the way of a skilled developer.
I'm not sure what's wrong with a thread like this, it's healthy to talk
about and it is technical and it is about ColdFusion development.
I think there has been entirely too much
Might be something like this:
function grabDataRow (rs,row) {
var result = StructNew();
for (x = 1; x LTE ListLen(rs.ColumnList); x = x + 1) {
result[ListGetAt(columnList,x)] = rs[columnList][row]; //
this part might need some adjusting
}
return
I would disagree with this. IDEs have a number of measurable properties,
such as speed to startup, speed to open a file, speed to save a file,
features or lack of features, such as built in diff, integration with source
control or code trust to name a few.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
West Coast this year: http://www.macromedia.com/macromedia/events/max/
- Calvin
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
Um, why can't you? I'm only looking at 7 right now, but I could have sworn
that 6 installed the JMC too?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: John Beynon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 11:04 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: JRUN 4 vs Bundled JRUN in CFMX 6.1
it's
they are referring to the standalone install
with CFMX standard.
-Adam
On Apr 7, 2005 11:43 AM, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um, why can't you? I'm only looking at 7 right now, but I could have sworn
that 6 installed the JMC too?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: John Beynon
If I have a custom tag and I want to know, within the custom tag, what
template actually called it, how I would I determine that?
I don't want to have to pass the template value into the tag, I'd like the
tag to determine this on its own.
Thanks,
Calvin
Too bad we can't store objects in those replicated sessions
-Original Message-
From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 1:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Async CFML (demo on damons blog)
Because it's easy and it works out the box. Also, there is
If you upgrade in place on the CF 5 server, you should be able to move the
neo-query.xml file from the upgraded server to your new server.
Of course you can upgrade in place and use the built in web server and it
'should' import your datasources and not disturb your 'real' web server.
Then you
101 - 200 of 886 matches
Mail list logo
