How about something like this?
function setChangeStyle (recordset,column,row) {
result = 'defaultClass';
if (row LT (recordset.recordcount - 1) AND recordset[column][row+1]
NEQ recordset[column][row]) {
result = 'highlightClass';
}
return result;
}
. But would like to keep the CF5 server running just in
case.
Greg
On Apr 6, 2005 4:35 PM, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you upgrade in place on the CF 5 server, you should be able to move the
neo-query.xml file from the upgraded server to your new server.
Of course you can upgrade
How are the passwords 'freely available'?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 4:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Is CFMX 7 any better?
It's bad enough that the Administrator password is freely available, but I
just realized that every
Actually, I'm pretty sure that cfform.js is used by the html forms for
JavaScript validation.
In CF 5, the JavaScript was embedded in the header, in CFMX 6.1+, the JS is
linked to from the header, and that default path is /cfide/scripts/cfform.js
(note: wddx JavaScript functions are handled the
Heck, in this particular case, it could be scoping that is tripping you
up...
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 1:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Anything wrong with this statement?
I know...but it's a lot more work
I've always found pound signs make it hard for me to read stuff so I find
myself organizing my code in such a way as to avoid them where reasonable.
Nice solution Rebecca.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 5:28 PM
To:
cfform.js Error
Make sure you have the /cfide directory mapped as a virtual directory
on your web server.
On Apr 4, 2005 7:31 AM, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I'm pretty sure that cfform.js is used by the html forms for
JavaScript validation.
In CF 5, the JavaScript was embedded
Except that I'd point out that a topic about naming conventions may be
relevant but undesirable to some. What constitutes a majority that says it
is out of place? A majority of registered subscribers? A majority of
frequent posters? If so, who decides what frequent means?
-Original
and server memory
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:56:36 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to be nuts about it, what if someone wanted to have 6 instances on a
2
CPU box, would it be reasonable to have 1 simultaneous request per CPU?
The overhead of switching between JVM processes would probably
Did you mean Camel Case or Pascal Case?
-Original Message-
From: Dawson, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 2:25 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Table name - Camel case or Underscore
cf_pie action=throw target=Marlon /
M!ke
-Original Message-
From:
You mean like this thread? :P
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: community threads
It seems that frequently the threads with the longest lives on this list are
the ones that have nothing to do
Now you're delving into normalization, which is loosely connected, but not
tightly coupled, with table/view/etc. naming conventions.
I prefer to use the singular myself for the reasons already listed such as;
the name represents the collection, which is a singular set, references make
more sense,
Just to be nuts about it, what if someone wanted to have 6 instances on a 2
CPU box, would it be reasonable to have 1 simultaneous request per CPU?
On another note, I've seen where performance was significantly improved by
dropping the heap size down significantly (I'm talking from 1 gig to 256
Which puts you right back to referencing individual rows with a plural.
Developers.firstname has a developers.phonenumber with a developers.gender!
Of course you can alias in the query or as you mentioned about the query
objects using singular...
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Paul
In regards to 1, you had to mangle syntax to write that sentence. It should
read:
1. In set theory, sets are given plural names because they are a
*collection* of entities.
Which of course could really be that they are given singular names because
they are a single set.
- Calvin
We'll need to have more details like number of processors, amount of
physical memory, operating system, etc. Also what database/external
resources you are connecting to might also be useful.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Dave Phillips [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March
- Singular or plural?
Calvin Ward wrote:
In regards to 1, you had to mangle syntax to write that sentence.
I did no such thing.
It should read:
1. In set theory, sets are given plural names because they are a
*collection* of entities.
Which of course could really
Holy crazy thoughts batman!
-Original Message-
From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Table name - Singular or plural?
snip
Or just forget the stafftypeid and use stafftypename as the PK
: Keith Gaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 12:50 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Table name - Singular or plural?
Calvin Ward wrote:
Alright then, I guess I don't get it.
I just didn't think that something like Databases are collection of
tables. was proper English
Variables is plural
Request is singular
They both can hold the exact same kind, type and structure and usage. The
only difference is where they can be accessed from. But the entities within
both structures can be the same.
I don't think we're going to find consistency here.
-Original
Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX 7 ENT Configuration Assistance?
We'll need to have more details like number of processors, amount of
physical memory, operating system, etc. Also what database/external
or plural?
Calvin Ward wrote:
Ahh, I see.
I would say then that Tables are collections of rows, or that A table
is
a (singular) collection of rows.
Which was the point I was making... However that was long ago and I forgot
the point of making a point about any of the point(s)...
Ok, how
How about changing your password field to a text field, use javascript to
capture input and transfer it to a hidden field and replace the characters
with a set number of * symbols in the 'password' field that is actually a
text field?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Trey Rouse
Gaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:50 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Table name - Singular or plural?
Calvin Ward wrote:
Variables is plural
Request is singular
They both can hold the exact same kind, type and structure and usage. The
only difference is where
?
This has to be the stupidest and most wasteful thread I have ever seen.
STFU!
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:56 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Table name - Singular or plural?
Then it is still inconsistent, since Variables
I believe it is documented to work this way.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Charles Heizer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 2:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: ListAppend and delimiter question
Hello,
I have a strange question, I think. Can a delimiter be only one
to be a lot of great speakers and sessions about CFMX 7,
too--it's not a BlueDragon show).
Vince Bonfanti
New Atlanta Communications, LLC
http://www.newatlanta.com
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 8:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject
Um, I know that, what I meant was, what does the markme mean in the domain
name?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 10:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: New CFFORM website
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:38:19 -0500, Calvin Ward
I believe you can use
cfexecute name=C:\PERL\BIN\PERL.EXE arguments=#arg_build# timeOut=5
variable=perloutput /
in CFMX 6.1 and higher.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 7:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Running
.
Vince
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 6:59 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Is BlueDragon.NET the greatest thing since sliced bread?
Vince,
Are you saying that .NET performs better than all J2EE
implementation? What exactly
?
I dunno, I sorta disagree. If you're savvy enough to monkey with URL,
you're implicity altering a CGI value, and are probably savvy enough
to edit (unencrypted) cookies.
-Joe
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:43:41 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure that would be a good idea, both
Jared is correct,
Scoping improves performance and avoids ambiguity (ref CFMX study guide),
and this makes sense.
If you aren't going to scope, then you are decreasing performance and
increasing ambiguity.
So the best practice is to scope. In an application, based on the needs, you
may
It shows investment in the community, which in turn can be a marketing plus.
I think it has worked well for Sun...
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 12:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFUnited - Where's Macromedia?
David
Wasn't the release of the product announced on this list when it occurred?
How about Ben drops a bi-weekly announcement of the WACK books under various
guises? And maybe Damon can re-announce Blackstone's release once a month
too?
I too consider this blatant and undesirable advertising, just as
Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 March 2005 22:58
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Is BlueDragon.NET the greatest thing since sliced bread?
Wasn't the release of the product announced on this list when it occurred?
How about Ben drops a bi-weekly announcement of the WACK
I'm not sure that would be a good idea, both FORM and URL are tied to user
submitted fields, while CGI and Cookie are usually not so.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Joe Rinehart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 7:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Best practice
Of course the best way to grow the OO awareness is to talk about the
challenges and solutions in the more widely lists, such as this one,
especially as the topic is definitely relevant and interesting :)
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Brian Holder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
:44 -0500, Rick Root [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Calvin Ward wrote:
I too consider this blatant and undesirable advertising, just as I would
if
Damon or Ben did the same thing.
I consider the ensuing discussion to be much worse.
- Rick
What exactly is markme about?
-Original Message-
From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 8:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: New CFFORM website
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:16:13 -0400, Irvin Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike IS a Macromedia employee, so
I believe that scoping is important and removed ambiguity, especially for
developers (including yourself) who may latter have to work on that page.
I would opine that scoping is a best practice.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March
Having said all that, what's with the Amazon ship date? I ordered two copies
of the first one!
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 3:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Ordering WACK from Amazon
Very good point. And that is the
That is definitely true, however, it can also be undesirable, for example a
developer might want form submissions to only arrive via post and not get.
I prefer to try to code using scopes and typically use something similar to
this in the case you mentioned (one may note that this is copied from
I think purchasing 2 CFMX 7 Enterprise licenses (4 CPUs) will qualify you
for the MVLP program, so there should be a decent discount applied to the
retail price.
http://www.macromedia.com/buy/volume_license/vlo/
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I suspect that this is on 30 day trial, after 30 days it will revert to
developer probably.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Mark W. Breneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 11:58 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Deploying CFMX7 Dev war file to J2EE server, allows CFMX
I couldn't get it to work with 7 either, just hangs.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 9:54 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Free Coldfusion Devs Tool
I am not sure if its being updated (no info here) but I have tried to
use it with
My understanding is that RDS is only used for the creation of the reports,
the .cfr files shouldn't need RDS.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Phillip Duba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 10:03 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RDS and ColdFusion Report Builder
I've
I think it's a great looking application, let us know when you've got a CF7
version, as we can't run it to let it alert us :)
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Aebig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 11:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Free Coldfusion Devs
The point about labeling can't be emphasized enough.
You are effectively creating a variable when you say textLabel44, would that
be how you would want to trouble shoot code you are working with? Why would
you want to struggle with it in a configuration scenario?
The reason that we all like to
This $50 bit of software here:
http://shop.blizzard.com/section1/?user=E4ihFqmiJ7R0kmA/UFvB7UBENGrG1z6qndqq
xG6w8qQ=#war3x is licensed for either and even comes packaged with both. No
transfer fee.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Justin D. Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday,
It is too expensive, imho. Folks keep saying that 12,000 isn't much, but
that's not the whole picture.
It's 12,000 per server up to 2 cpus.
So for Tommy, if they were to deploy it load balanced, that's at least
24,000. How about a test environment? There's another 12,000, or is it
24,000 there
Has anyone used the new Categories feature of MX 7's Verity?
The documentation seems to really skip over how it's used other than here's
how to enable it in the tag.
- Calvin
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and
Depending on the time frame for delivering your app and the amount of
traffic/load, you can license MS SQL Server 2005 Express for free.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Scott Mulholland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 5:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL
You could download the core files for Fusebox 4.1, it writes cfm files
frequently.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Andy Mcshane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 7:05 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFFILE Coldfusion code
Hi, I am trying to dynamically create .cfm
Keep in mind that the BlueDragon implementation only supports English (no
Language attribute), and can only search HTML and text based documents.
Ref:
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/docs/6_1/BlueDragon_
61_CFML_Compatibility_Guide.pdf
- Calvin
-Original Message-
Quote him on the completed project and throw in the CF server for 'free'.
Conversely, at least currently, I don't find clients that can't/won't fork
out 1,200 for a CF server to usually be all that fun or profitable to work
with.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Will Tomlinson
What other hosting company has suffered the same problem?
-Original Message-
From: Connie DeCinko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 6:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: So does CF 7 Suck, Or Crystaltech?
Not true.
-Original Message-
From: Irvin Gomez
It's becoming more common for brick and mortar check outs to ask for phone
number or other personal information, even when paying by cash.
I tell them no, and if they keep asking I typically offer them 867-5309
I personally find it a real turn off to doing business with that retailer.
If I
How do the physical paths map to the website?
For example, does C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\MySite in your dev environment map to
www.something.ext\MySite in dev?
How does it look in production?
I wouldn't be surprised if a hosting organization would not want to manage
mappings for each site/client.
-
I hadn't tried the dynamic paths before... I wonder if this limitation is
documented anywhere?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Paul Kenney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 4:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFCs and paths...I'm having a couple of problems...
The
Why are questions about wddx off topic?
It seem like a lot of stuff is going to cf-community that seems appropriate
here.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 11:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: WDDX Status?
Sorry folks - I
How about removing the reset=yes?
-Original Message-
From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 6:57 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF to excel
without the cfheader tags is the page loaind in the broiwser properly?
Adam H
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 21:47:16
in a mapped CFC directory as this causes
me pain keeping track of them in CVS.
Doug
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 06:26:07 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hadn't tried the dynamic paths before... I wonder if this limitation is
documented anywhere?
- Calvin
-Original Message
Correct!
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 8:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: built-in server in ColdFusion MX?
They are wrong - it IS JRun 4. At least a tailored version of it.
-Original Message-
,/,.)#.pathtocfc
s.inmy.app)
/
I usually don't store my cfcs in a mapped CFC directory as this causes
me pain keeping track of them in CVS.
Doug
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 06:26:07 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hadn't tried the dynamic paths before... I wonder if this limitation
Well, except I thought we were talking about the built in app server here?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Nick de Voil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 9:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: built-in server in ColdFusion MX?
What is the built-in server in
In other words, make sure your bed is your nicest piece of furniture...
-Original Message-
From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 6:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: What to do - stagnant job
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:31:23 -0600, Donna French [EMAIL
The reason is that the library and template functionality actually let you
see in Dreamweaver what you are working on while you work on it. But not
only that, if it worked correctly (which in this case it didn't), the
resulting html only code will run on any server that can serve up html,
This is good, but I would do the following instead:
In the CSS put...
..searchHighlight {background-color: #00}
In the HTML...
You can span class=searchHighlighthighlight/span text within search
results.
The reason is that there should only be one instance of an ID in an html
document and
Hmm, would em be more appropriate in that context?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:37 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Gmail highlighting
When taking a semantic approach, I would consider using strong for
I have to disagree. This is very much on topic in my opinion. Since when is
discussing UI design for a CF application not appropriate for cf-talk?
I liked the rest of your post, very useful and well written.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
-
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: maandag 14 maart 2005 16:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Gmail highlighting
Hmm, would em be more appropriate
I think this commentary is very much on-topic, unless you want to move all
discussion of CSS, Javascript, SQL, IIS, Apache, etc. to cf-community?
If it comes to that, the forum will lose a lot of value.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Michael T. Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I read all this and I still don't know what the bug is...
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 4:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Anyone used these tools?
oh gawd not the BLINK tag LMFAO!
but yeah its serious and the emails were
First, who has the correct number of hyphens?
SQL Server: F1D8EEEB-8F16-41F1-9E73-1E27C65AC14C
IETF Draft Example: f81d4fae-7dec-11d0-a765-00a0c91e6bf6
(http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mealling-uuid-urn-05.txt)
CFMX 7: 8C5302DB-C291-F05B-FFC9200478D6DC15
Comments?
- Calvin
Well, I don't read cf-community because it has too much non-technical un
profession related stuff that I just don't relate to and don't have time
for.
From comments before, I'm sure that others also don't for similar reasons.
Therefore, if it is about technology, technology partners and so
to create one for SQL!
Any one of these will help
http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm?ID=54
http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm?ID=288
http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm?ID=512
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 2005 11:59
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: UUID
I don't believe you can.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: vishnu prasad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 6:29 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: coldfusion Two Phase commin
hi
i have a 2 datasource name called ds1 and ds2
i have some query using the DS1 and some
See, you should be using Dreamweaver anyway! Macromedia says so:
What tool should developers use to write applications for ColdFusion MX?
Macromedia Dreamweaver MX 2004 is the premier development environment
for ColdFusion MX 7. New Dreamweaver extensions included with ColdFusion MX
7 make it
) disagree with the Mother Ship - I highly
encourage any CF developer out there to look at CFEclipse. It is a
wonderful editor and well worth the time. If you were a HS+ user (like
I was), I think you will find this a lot more to your liking then
DWMX.
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 06:30:47 -0500, Calvin
to duplicate all the stuff I use in HS+, I would
switch.
Does CFE support good management of code snippets *with* shortcuts? I
really like HS's ability to add variables to snippets.
M!kep
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 8:38 AM
Bah, I'll just skip the site, I'm not going to monkey with my user string!
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 5:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Anyone used these tools?
{JavaScript Application]
! This page does not
One common method is the domain name methodology.
So, for example, if you get Raymond's Blog CFC, it will typically live under
drive:\site\org\camden
And be called like so:
CreateObject(component,org.camden.Blog) or something like that.
However, frameworks may impose their own methodology,
You'll probably get a better response to BlueDragon questions from the
BlueDragon mailing lists.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: E C list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 2:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Blue Dragon Coexisting with CF 5.0?
Can anyone tell me
For fun, something like the below might work (this is completely untested, I
wrote it in the email).
- Calvin
function ListElementExists(l,i,d) {
var tl = Replace(l,dd,dUDFTEMPITEMd,ALL);
var result = false;
if (ListLen(l,d) GTE I AND ListGetAt(l,i,d) IS NOT UDFTEMPITEM)
NewAtlanta has said in a number of ways that they aren't after 100%
compatibility.
Of course, CFMX 7 really changed the landscape a bit, and I don't see how NA
will catch up with that.
-Original Message-
From: Michael T. Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005
I don't think it is absurd at all, CFML was started and developed by Allaire
and then Macromedia. The only apparent contribution that NewAtlanta has done
was to copy the end user (meaning developer) functionality and attempt to
subvert market-share from the authors and their intended 'heir'.
All
I got tired of tinkering with the variance between prod and my workstation,
so I setup VMWare (or you can use Virtual PC), so that I have a self
contained version of the server (for all intents and purposes) on my
workstation. This allows me to disable enable all services by simply
)...but
assumed that since it's happening, it's all on the up and up.
/me moves over to cf-community and waits :)
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:27:34 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it is absurd at all, CFML was started and developed by
Allaire
and then Macromedia. The only apparent
If you are looking at implementing Flash Forms in CFMX7, consider that your
unsuspecting users might end up installing a Yahoo toolbar along with the
latest flash player to see your forms.
View this in Windows Internet Explorer:
For some reason posting to a cfc like that doesn't feel right to me. But
that's just my preference.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 12:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFLOCATION inside CFCs
I use this for CFC's that
You can also just copy the CFMX 7 CFIDE from a working install on another
machine if you have one.
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 1:53 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX 7 missing admin index.cfm
That's because 6.1 had no
advertising with your Flash Player Install!
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:57:29 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are looking at implementing Flash Forms in CFMX7, consider that
your
unsuspecting users might end up installing a Yahoo toolbar along with the
latest flash player to see your forms
For ColdFusion, I prefer presentation elements (we are talking about
HTML/XHTML/XML for the most part, right?) to be in tags.
The main reasons are simple.
I'd rather see:
ui:navdiv
a href=homehome/a
/ui:navdiv
Than
cfsavecontent variable=myvar
a href=homehome/a
/cfsavecontent
I don't know that number of years is an accurate way to assess prowess.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Will The Game [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 3:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CF/programming experience from the list?
I just wanted to try and gauge where
I wrote simple apps on a Vic 20 which had only a cassette tape to store and
even run the apps from!
-Original Message-
From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 5:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF/programming experience from the list?
On Thu, 03 Mar
I would say that you would definitely want to start moving towards the newer
platforms. It's not always that you have a specific need for a specific new
feature and you can justify the cost in that fashion. It's also where you
are increasing your capability and nimbleness in responding to client
No, but I'm in the Jacksonville area, about 2 hours northeast of you. You
should come to our CFUG meetings!
Does Orlando have a CFUG?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Damien McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 1:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Central
4.5.2 is no longer supported by Macromedia.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 1:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Cold Fusion Gettin Hot?
I thought when 6.0 came out, shortly after that support for 4.5 ended.
But I only base
?
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 1:48 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Cold Fusion Gettin Hot?
4.5.2 is no longer supported by Macromedia.
It depends on the level of support. You can still hire MM consultants to
help
Scott
Technical Consultant
NuSphere Pty Ltd
Level 2/33 Bank Street
South Melbourne, Victoria, 3205
Phone: 03 9686 0485 - Fax: 03 9699 7976
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 25 February 2005 10:46 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF7 won't run under
201 - 300 of 886 matches
Mail list logo
