, Dreamweaver and UTF-8
Calvin Ward wrote:
If I understand correctly, if I use Dreamweaver to save a .cfm file with a
BOM for Unicode, then I shouldn't need to use cfprocessingdirective.
Does
that sound correct?
correct but not really the best practice. a BOM isn't actually part
...
Would someone check and see if they can get this site?
www.FortStewart.com
Thanks,
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 5:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: How to set virtual sites for localhost viewing?
It'll take a few
Well, I don't think anyone said anything about knowing more about NDAs than
anyone else...
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 10:55 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF7 won't run under IIS, wont install - business almost shut
down
There's www.SeeFusion.com , does that help you any?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Ryan P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 10:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Thread Monitoring?
Is there a monitor or some kind of software/code that can tell me in
real-time what
There used to be a custom tag floating around that would allow you to list
ColdFusion 5 datasources, does anyone know where I might find it?
Thanks,
Calvin
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time
Another thing you can do with Dreamweaver is put your Panel Groups on the
second monitor allowing more room for your pages.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 5:19 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Homesite 5.5 vs.
.
cheers,
barneyb
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:48:36 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think it was ever fixed for the 6.1 DevNet version, this was one
of
the reasons I never renewed that program. Not because it had something
like
this, but because it broke correct code.
- Calvin
While it hasn't been yet in the top banner area of the MM site that I've
noticed... What's up with that?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Woodward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 8:14 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF7 won't run under IIS, wont install - business
I'd like to point out that it would be advantageous to be able to easily
switch between flash/xml cfform based on the client without having to worry
about such things.
I thought that same named form fields were covered in the html spec?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Mike Nimer
I'd also like to see these, and also especially in the context of the
productivity layer.
Thanks,
Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 11:34 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Development Speed
Ben,
Can you point me to
Hi Rick,
Basically, you'll need to point the DNS entry for each development site to
your development server.
Let's say that your server IP is 332.278.984.870 (which is impossible), then
you would want to point dev.clientsite.com to that IP. (alternatively you
can use an alias to whatever site is
I'm thinking that Adrian is right, I definitely find myself uncomfortable
with this solution.
If you are creating some sort of shared variables or other code that needs
to be run by both apps, then you would probably be better served creating an
include file that is included by both Apps and
Yea, that's not exactly making sense to me.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 12:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: REPOST: Two applications sharing cfid/cftoken
Have you got an example for us?
-Original
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: REPOST: Two applications sharing cfid/cftoken
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:47:12 -0500, Calvin Ward wrote:
If you are creating some sort of shared variables or other code that needs
to be run by both apps, then you would probably be better served creating
an
include file
to setup the
Application.cfm to differentiate between localhost (for development) and
server setup.
I do a lot of development on a laptop and am not always plugged in to the
network, so I put
MySQL and CF on my laptop for development, too...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto
not a problem to
preview sites
to clients. All my initial development is done on a laptop, apart from the
server.
Thanks for the tip on VMWare...I'll check that out!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 12:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
and @
as A Records for ShellmanBluffOutfitters.com...
For the virtual website on my server, I put dev.ShellmanBluffOutfitters.com
as
Host Header...sound right?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 2:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE
to get my head around this new approach to the
workflow...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 3:16 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: How to set virtual sites for localhost viewing?
The dev part sounds just right, did it work
If I understand correctly, if I use Dreamweaver to save a .cfm file with a
BOM for Unicode, then I shouldnt need to use cfprocessingdirective. Does
that sound correct?
Ref:
http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/mx/coldfusion/articles/globalize_03.html
The problem is that pages saved as above seem
the appropriate DNS steps and just need to wait or is there
something else I need to do?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 4:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: How to set virtual sites for localhost viewing?
VMWare allows
Never mind, it was an errant include!
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 4:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFMX, Dreamweaver and UTF-8
If I understand correctly, if I use Dreamweaver to save a .cfm file with a
BOM for Unicode
Try VMWare, they have a free beta you can get into pretty easily for the
next version, for a test platform, you can't beat it.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 5:41 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF7 won't run under IIS, wont
When I have an issue with getting CFMX up and running, first I go with the
shutting down all other options, and then I go for the built in web server
option in the install. If that does the trick, then I know it's an
IIS,Apache, etc issue.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Peter Farrell
Andrew,
Isn't this also a violation of the NDA?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 9:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF7 won't run under IIS, wont install - business almost shut
down for 2 days now.
Greg,
Having
I don't think it was ever fixed for the 6.1 DevNet version, this was one of
the reasons I never renewed that program. Not because it had something like
this, but because it broke correct code.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Mine hangs, which is unfortunate, this is great looking!
I'm able to access the cf documentation for the various components in a web
browser using the path that I specified, so it seems like it is working
correctly.
Thoughts?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Aebig [mailto:[EMAIL
Is CFMX7 using the MS driver or DataDirect?
-Original Message-
From: Alin Sinpalean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 2:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Upgrading and datasources
Has anyone performed an upgrade to CFMX 7 from CF 5 and had
issues with the
Is there a way to turn of the ability to access the file system with RDS but
retain the other features?
This would be on a Windows 2003 server.
Thanks,
Calvin
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based
I was afraid it would come to that, pretty unfortunate.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 2:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Upgrading and datasources
Has anyone performed an upgrade to CFMX 7 from CF 5 and had
That's no good...
-Original Message-
From: Figy, Kam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 12:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF7 Devnet + serving generated XML?
That doesn't work in CF7 either.
Grg
-Original Message-
From: Kwang Suh [mailto:[EMAIL
Doesn't work in CFMX7.
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lynch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 4:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: serialize cfc
Not sure what's happened in CF7, but could you do it with Java by making a
CFC wrapper which implements Serializable?
How about this:
Your site: www.defaultwebsite.com
Client site: www.myclient.com
Client development site: dev.myclient.com
Setup your development sites to have hostheaders for the dev.myclient.com
site. This would more closely mirror their site in production.
- Calvin
-Original
Has anyone performed an upgrade to CFMX 7 from CF 5 and had issues with the
datasources not working properly?
CFMX7 doesn't seem to translate port numbers for SQL Server properly
(especially if they are set to dynamically determine in the ODBC console)
and none of the passwords seem to work!
I don't know if this helps the original poster, isn't SeeFusion CFMX only?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Knudsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 12:01 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Monitor memory usage of CF Threads
have you hooked up seefusion JDBC
Having both may be useful. What will be interesting is how the keywords pan
out in real usage.
I might choose RegEx for a keyword, and another might choose Regular
Expression, and a third might also choose RegEx.
This type of scenario will play into how the feature is useful.
Calvin
Yea, but it was funny!
-Original Message-
From: Spike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 9:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfeclipse ? rob
Jeez Will,
People who don't know will be getting the impression you're about to go
postal ;)
Spike
Will Tomlinson wrote:
Change it to GridNewb, thanks...
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 5:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFGRID woes
let me splain a few things here since some of us seem a little confused by
me and what I've said in
I choose based on my need.
If the page already has cfoutput blocks, then I use cfloop, unless I need to
group output and then I use cfoutput. On a new page, I typically choose
cfloop...
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February
As far as I can tell the only difference between developer and designer
views is which side of the screen your panel groups start on, and that the
editor starts the first time in code or design view.
After that, the editor opens in the last used view.
I mostly have pretty good performance and I
That is true, however if OEMs start implementing xyz browser then guess what
is out of the box?
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 5:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Internet Explorer 7 (no really!)
people aren't 'not
That works both ways. CFMX offers unique capabilities that yours does not.
-Original Message-
From: Vince Bonfanti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 7:10 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: way to import the C-Sharp code in ColdFusion.
Hi Nathan,
BlueDragon doesn't
So they care about standards indirectly, since standards enable their
access?
Keep in mind that standards in the physical world (handicapped parking,
wheelchair access widths, and so forth) are part of what makes life better
for folks with handicaps now. Fortunately those standards are enforced
What would be REALLY cool would be
cfscript language=ECMAScript or cfscript language=JavaScript
Which reminds me, does anyone know of the specific differences between RegEx
in CFMX and JavaScript?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I have to say, that's a pretty impressive feature list.
While an odd question, I have to ask, what are the biggest challenges facing
someone adopting Plum?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Adam Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:21 AM
To: CF-Talk
It's fairly common practice to not place your applications in the default
locations.
Also, depending on your application makeup, you may want to consider
something like this:
drive\mysites\www.mysite.com\webroot
Point IIS to the webroot directory and store site related files that you
don't want
I'd recommended removing the cfdocs directory completely. The documentation
is available at livedocs.macromedia.com or from within HomeSite or
Dreamweaver. It can also be downloaded from www.macromedia.com.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
possible complications from not having anything that's in there?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Virtual Directories for Websites...follow-up remarks
I'd recommended removing
: Virtual Directories for Websites...follow-up remarks
So...do I just move the folder to some other location?
Any functional implications for doing that?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:50 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE
I can imagine that it would be tough for folks to commit to reading 400
pages of documentation to 'get' Plum :P
-Original Message-
From: Michael T. Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 1:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Plum vs Adalon?
But do take the time
I agree, not only that, he may want to start reviewing some of the object
oriented CF stuff out there as well.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Michael T. Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 4:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Some advice?
With all the
I particularly enjoyed the use of the word 'uninitiated'.
I'm familiar with Fusebox, where's my robe since I'm an initiate?!?
At any rate, after having used Fusebox 3 for the last 6 months on a number
of already developed apps, I can say that there are good ways and bad ways
to build a Fusebox
Yes but dave finally posted something I enjoyed! j/k
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 4:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: speaking of OOP
1. This is really a CF-Community comment.
2. Those who are doing it right really
So effectively, your steps under this solution are:
1) Create a CFUser Account
2) Ensure that account has sufficient privileges to the resources it needs,
such as the share on the remote server)
3) Set the CF service to use that CFUser Account on the Login tab of the
Service properties screen
4)
I'm thinking that's over the top.
The only crazy question is the one that's never asked.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Tyler Fitch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 1:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFQUERYPARAM in CFC?
Holy crap. That's an amazing thing
If you haven't installed CFMX7, you can also view this content at:
http://www.macromedia.com/examples/cfgettingstarted/experience/index_content
..cfm
Enjoy!
Calvin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005
: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2005 7:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFQUERYPARAM in CFC?
I'm thinking that's over the top.
The only crazy question is the one that's never asked.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Tyler Fitch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Just heard this on another list:
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-5577263.html?tag=nl.e589
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2005/feb05/02-15RSA05KeynotePR.asp
- Calvin
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and
(no really!)
There you go - perhaps they'll take the chance to produce a
standards-compliant browser while they are at it. I doubt it'll shift me off
FireFox any time soon - the web developer plugin is too useful.
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
They had no plans to upgrade it without attaching it to an OS, which of
course can't be applied to anybody not running that OS. That is exactly what
I meant by apathy due to lack of competition.
I also suspect the content of the update will be in part driven by the
competition.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 8:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Internet Explorer 7 (no really!)
They had no plans to upgrade it without attaching it to an OS, which of
course can't be applied to anybody not running that OS
it without attaching it to an OS, which of
course can't be applied to anybody not running that OS.
That's all I'm getting at. :-)
- Matt Small
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 9:03 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Internet
surfing with IE.
-Adam
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:03:29 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not entirely sure how your comments apply to my observations.
Microsoft removed the competition for browsers and promptly ceased
improving
their browser beyond the barest minimum.
FireFox
How do you define commercial software?
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 12:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Internet Explorer 7 (no really!)
Matthew Small wrote:
Do you want a new security model because you don't
That's the rub though, browsers allow the user to install software from the
web with ease.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 3:54 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Internet Explorer 7 (no really!)
That's what I do. I also
Wonder how bloated object serialization would be...
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 4:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: WDDX Future
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:27:58 -0500, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wanted to
They typically don't, unless they are paying the developer to develop a web
based application that is cross browser and has 'advanced' capabilities for
the end user. Then they indirectly care by caring about the cost.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL
Of course, first the flash player has to achieve ubiquity on cell phones.
It's not available on any smart phone that uses Palm OS, for example.
-Original Message-
From: Russ Unger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 7:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Any sites using
I'm using VMWare Workstation on my laptop, and I have to say, it ROCKS!
Instead of having to fire up several services to get a development 'server'
going, I just start my virtual machine and I'm off and running. When I shut
down, I just 'pause' the virtual machine and it recalls exactly where it
a Mobile Device?!?! I really cannot
see that happening - certainly not with large forms.
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 February 2005 12:02
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Any sites using the new Flash forms?
Of course, first the flash player has to achieve
-
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 15 februari 2005 13:22
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Any sites using the new Flash forms?
I've tried it... very painful experience, even on the Treo 600.
-Original
Get Flex? Umno.
-Original Message-
From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:18 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Any sites using the new Flash foms?
If you don't like the way CF generates the forms in Flash get Flex or
open up your Flash IDE.
-Adam
Agreed
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 9:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Any sites using the new Flash foms?
there isn't a single person who provided good arguments for
the use of Flash forms
Right, and on the other
I do have J2ME installed on my Treo...
-Original Message-
From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:15 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Any sites using the new Flash forms?
All this talk about how mobile phones can't be used for anything
useful on the
I don't understand why we can't just use XML and ECMAScript for
everything...
-Original Message-
From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 12:53 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Any sites using the new Flash foms?
Octal Absolute Never trust a program
That might even have a cascading effect as smaller folks that have chosen
another route grow larger or take influential roles in larger companies...
-Original Message-
From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 6:58 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Flex
I
I can't completely agree with that, where's the MM equivalent of Visual
Studio or WSAD?
-Original Message-
From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2005 10:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Flex
i AGREE!
I can't think of any other company thats doing as much for
Are you restarting CF before you request index.cfm?
-Original Message-
From: Bert Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 5:48 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: can't get onApplicationStart to fire...
I can't seem to get onApplicationStart to run, nor onSessionStart, but
There's also this:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/productinfo/product_editions/f
p_frameset.html
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Duncan I Loxton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 6:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Business Case for a 4.5 - 7
Tony,
Are you saying that no error is fired and no email is received, but there's
an email in the undelvr cfmail folder?
Or maybe I should just ask, how are you determining the email did not
deliver?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
How about something more abstracted:
...alt0{background-color: #fff;}
...alt0{background-color: #ffc;}
cfscript
function setRowClass(cr) {
return alt#cr MOD 2#;
}
/cfscript
class=#setRowClass(currentRow)#
A bit more typing on the one occurrence, but in the end you've more control
over
be getting set, but only request.started is
getting set.
Bert
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 06:32:53 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you restarting CF before you request index.cfm?
-Original Message-
From: Bert Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 5:48 AM
the cfapplication tag with that application name)
after the CF server is started.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 7:02 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: can't get onApplicationStart to fire...
Because if you don't restart CF
Is this the unlimited IP version or the Developer Edition?
-Original Message-
From: Cutter (CF related) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 8:13 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFMX7 on DevNet
As promised (for those who want to know) CFMX 7 is now available from
the
Just a thought, considering that 4.5 doesn't support even UDFs, I can see
how any given project, with that feature alone, could be a little bit faster
to code...
4.5 is slow, unsupported by MM and doesn't adequately support certain
current technologies such as XML, Web services and Unicode.
-
. This is one
of the reasons we don't use it except on personal dev boxes.
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 February 2005 11:03
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RDS Sandboxing on MX 7?
The datasources would be segregated, but by default I don't think the file
I prefer cfscript when possible, because it helps one think about separating
logic from presentation. And if you can move it into cfscript, then you can
consider turning it into a function
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday,
Why do you consider top and bottom cfoutputs a 'silly' thing?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 11:59 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Few cfoutput Vs Many cfoutput
I agree top and bottum cf outputs could be as equally
If you're looking to sell this solution, then you you should seriously
consider moving past 4.5.
Reason 1) It's probably hard to find
Reason 2) It's no longer supported by MM at all
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 10,
overall.
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:27:25 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you consider top and bottom cfoutputs a 'silly' thing?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 11:59 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject
Dude,
color=#FF is so last century!
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Dawson, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 1:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Few cfoutput Vs Many cfoutput
Well, sure. In the ideal world. ;-)
-Original Message-
From:
Remote Local Documents for Incremental Back-ups?
U...not sure I understand reason 1 below...what's hard to find?
As far as number 2, I've never needed their support...doesn't mean
I won't, but I've been using 4.5.2 for years without needing them...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Calvin
/MachII
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:25:56 -0500, Calvin Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, the onRequest method is quite interesting...
Has anyone already tinkered with it?
Yes, I've used it extensively. Do you have some specific questions?
--
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/
Team Fusebox
I believe the DevNet version of CF license required that each developer who
used it also had a DevNet license. Am I remembering correctly?
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Cutter (CF related) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 8:43 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject:
to
be at a specific workstation and without us having to place that
developing site on a production server with our hosting provider.
Cutter
Calvin Ward wrote:
I believe the DevNet version of CF license required that each developer who
used it also had a DevNet license. Am I remembering
You can try this list:
http://www.coldfusion-hosting-plans.com/
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 10:53 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX 7 feature breakdown
Everyone is throwing around this idea that Coldfusion
Adam,
Did you check the list I posted earlier? There were several ColdFusion hosts
under 10 dollars listed on it.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 4:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX 7 feature breakdown
Yes 3
Yea, my eyes have problems with the lack of capitalization, and I feel like
I'm reading the lyrics from an 80's Prince album...
Sorry for the interjection :P
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Micha Schopman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 6:16 AM
To: CF-Talk
Although that's a bit overkill!
I wish RDS could integrate into user security (LDAP, database, etc.) in some
fashion.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 9:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RDS Sandboxing on MX 7?
Does
One thing to note is that CF Developer edition has watermarked reports and
possibly cfdocument files. This of course removes some features from the
below scenario.
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 5:01 AM
To:
.
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 February 2005 7:43
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: RDS Sandboxing on MX 7?
Although that's a bit overkill!
I wish RDS could integrate into user security (LDAP, database, etc.) in some
fashion.
- Calvin
301 - 400 of 886 matches
Mail list logo
