RE: CFToken and CFID not secure for ecommerce

2001-12-07 Thread Dave Watts
How would you do this on a solaris install? Stop the CF Server, edit the cf.registry file so that it has the new key and value, and restart CF. I haven't tried it on Solaris, but it's supposed to work there too. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496

Re: CFToken and CFID not secure for ecommerce

2001-12-05 Thread Freddy
How would you do this on a solaris install? Ken Wilson wrote: You just have to create it. Works great. Ken -Original Message- From: Douglas Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 9:51 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFToken and CFID not secure for

CFToken and CFID not secure for ecommerce

2001-12-04 Thread Mike Randolph
Hello All, CFTOKEN AND CFID according to Macromedia's own admission and our own internal testing is not secure enought for a web applications where credit card data and money is involved. Goto a site like Amazon and notice the session ID they use are not a wimpy numeric string, they use a

RE: CFToken and CFID not secure for ecommerce

2001-12-04 Thread Ken Wilson
Hmmm, interesting comment. What I assume to be my SessionID from my current Amazon.com sessions: IE Session: 104-8981534-3506318 NS6 Session: 102-524-0108134 CFTOKENs for my current sessions on my CF Server: IE Session: 3c154df-3b8b20b0-54b8-4cfa-8ebb-be0b2ac13e32 NS6 Session:

RE: CFToken and CFID not secure for ecommerce

2001-12-04 Thread Dave Watts
Hmmm, interesting comment. What I assume to be my SessionID from my current Amazon.com sessions: IE Session: 104-8981534-3506318 NS6 Session: 102-524-0108134 CFTOKENs for my current sessions on my CF Server: IE Session: 3c154df-3b8b20b0-54b8-4cfa-8ebb-be0b2ac13e32 NS6

RE: CFToken and CFID not secure for ecommerce

2001-12-04 Thread Ken Wilson
Yeah, probably wasn't fair to use that example without explaining the background. Are you aware of any drawbacks to using this rather than the default method? Seems like it should be setup that way by default or at least should be configurable via the CFAdmin given the ease of guessing the other

Re: CFToken and CFID not secure for ecommerce

2001-12-04 Thread Douglas Brown
Well you were able to modify the registry in CF 4.5.1 and use the uuidToken which would be alphanumeric and identical in structure to a regular uuid. I looked in the registry for 5.0 and can no longer find the correct key. Doug - Original Message - From: Ken Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: CFToken and CFID not secure for ecommerce

2001-12-04 Thread Ken Wilson
You just have to create it. Works great. Ken -Original Message- From: Douglas Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 9:51 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CFToken and CFID not secure for ecommerce Well you were able to modify the registry in CF 4.5.1 and use

RE: CFToken and CFID not secure for ecommerce

2001-12-04 Thread Dave Watts
Yeah, probably wasn't fair to use that example without explaining the background. Are you aware of any drawbacks to using this rather than the default method? Seems like it should be setup that way by default or at least should be configurable via the CFAdmin given the ease of guessing

RE: CFToken and CFID not secure for ecommerce

2001-12-04 Thread Ken Wilson
I'm not sure why it's not the default, either; my guess is backward-compatibility. That would make sense. I've heard mention of needing to increase the DB field size to accomodate the extended length. I've always found (v4.5+ at least) that CF created fields of proper size even before making