it a bit more
difficult.
Thanks!
Sandy Clark
- Original Message -
From: Sean A Corfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: Cold Fusion MX Flash MX Applications
On Thursday, August 29, 2002, at 07:18 , S. Isaac Dealey
- Original Message -
SC From: Sean A Corfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SC To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SC Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:23 AM
SC Subject: Re: Cold Fusion MX Flash MX Applications
On Thursday, August 29, 2002, at 07:18 , S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
Anyone making use of Flash MX for web
, September 03, 2002 8:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Cold Fusion MX Flash MX Applications
Sean,
Any chance of Macromedia releasing an ActionScript reference
for Dreamweaver
MX?
While reading the information on the blue print application,
one of the
articles mentioned that actionscripting
Here's one that was developed by Waldo Smeets:
http://www.udzone.com/showDetail.asp?TypeId=4NewsId=3314
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Mike Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 8:21 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Cold Fusion MX Flash MX Applications
i
Very cool !
Thanks!
- Original Message -
From: dennis baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 9:35 AM
Subject: RE: Cold Fusion MX Flash MX Applications
Here's one that was developed by Waldo Smeets:
http://www.udzone.com
I've been getting a lot of bounces the past several days... Actually, I'd
say close to 80-90% of my messages to the list... I figured Mike was working
on that since I saw him sending test messages...
Isaac
Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer
www.turnkey.to
954-776-0046
This bounced
This bounced when I first tried to send it :(
On Friday, August 30, 2002, at 06:48 , Sean A Corfield wrote:
On Thursday, August 29, 2002, at 05:35 , Jason Miller wrote:
Back Button -
Add this to frame1
...
Then - attach this to your Back graphical button
You don't need to - Flash MX lets
Anyone making use of Flash MX for web application interfaces?
I've been building web applications using the traditional CF approach
for a couple of years, and the benefits that a Flash interface offers
of not having to jump around pages to process and refresh data is certainly
appealing.
Anyone making use of Flash MX for web application interfaces?
I've been building web applications using the traditional CF approach
for a couple of years, and the benefits that a Flash interface offers
of not having to jump around pages to process and refresh data is
certainly
appealing.
Take a look at Macromedia's Blue Print Application. Very cool
http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/mx/blueprint/
- Original Message -
From: Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:32 AM
Subject: Cold Fusion MX Flash MX Applications
On Thursday, August 29, 2002, at 07:18 , S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
Anyone making use of Flash MX for web application interfaces?
Yes, the new macromedia.com site will use Flash extensively for the
interface. It will be an enterprise-class Rich Internet Application, built
with Flash MX, Flash
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 8:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Cold Fusion MX Flash MX Applications
Anyone making use of Flash MX for web application interfaces?
I've been building web applications using the traditional CF approach
for a couple of years, and the benefits
AS is very well documented and very powerful - in the MX
release, pretty much *everything* is scriptable.
Sean,
I agree with the powerful aspect, although it has it quirks.
However, I cannot agree with you in respect to documentation. Flash's
documentation has been painful for the
Quick question for any Flash gurus who might be on the list:
How easy would it be to simulate a frame or an iframe in Flash
MX? How many hours would it take to get it to navigate to
any dynamically provided url, grab another flash movie from
that location, and embed the contents of the
into it, and that is great!
But it has its
limits.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 8:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Cold Fusion MX Flash MX Applications
Anyone making use of Flash MX for web application interfaces?
I've been building web
Quick question for any Flash gurus who might be on the list:
How easy would it be to simulate a frame or an iframe in Flash
MX? How many hours would it take to get it to navigate to
any dynamically provided url, grab another flash movie from
that location, and embed the contents of the movie
are asking for, this would take about 2
minutes to do (3 if you took a break).
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ben Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:56 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Cold Fusion MX Flash MX Applications
On Thursday, August 29, 2002, at 08:27 , Phoeun Pha wrote:
I believe flash has its uses, but it shouldn't and CAN'T replace certain
things a browser can offer, like a BACK button!
Flash MX supports the back button but I concede that you need to program
your movies a certain way to work with
So that allows you to load say... another 1 or 2 frame
.swf file with mostly actionscript into that scroll pane
from a url? Or do you have to already have the movieclip
available in the same .swf file?
When you import a SWF with actionscript, the actionscript in the SWF can
access
I would hate to be visually impared and try to find anything on the site you
are describing...
M
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:23 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Cold Fusion MX Flash MX Applications
On Thursday
by simulating an iframe, you mean load additional content
into the flash movie, it is pretty straight forward.
A simple IFrame is easy, but if you need to add initialization data,
then it gets complicated. For example, if you need to load a SWF that
makes a Flash Remoting call, but you need
Sean A Corfield wrote:
On Thursday, August 29, 2002, at 08:27 , Phoeun Pha wrote:
I believe flash has its uses, but it shouldn't and CAN'T replace certain
things a browser can offer, like a BACK button!
Back Button -
Add this to frame1
navStack = [];
On every frame that will have a back
largely because of the labor intensive nature of
developing Flash,
It's true that Flash MX development is still pretty
time-consuming. The MX
authoring environment, with drag'n'drop components, helps
here but it
still has a ways to go to catch up with the speed of plain
HTML
Fusion MX Flash MX Applications
I would hate to be visually impared and try to find anything
on the site you
are describing...
M
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:23 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Cold Fusion
Haggerty, Mike wrote:
I would hate to be visually impared and try to find anything on the site you
are describing...
That is something I have always wondered about. Why does everybody
associate Flash with being difficult for the visually impaired? Isn't it
just a matter of adding the spoken
PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Cold Fusion MX Flash MX Applications
by simulating an iframe, you mean load additional content
into the flash movie, it is pretty straight forward.
A simple IFrame is easy, but if you need to add initialization data,
then it gets complicated. For example
On Thursday, August 29, 2002, at 12:18 , Haggerty, Mike wrote:
I would hate to be visually impared and try to find anything on the site
you
are describing...
Flash MX has a lot of new accessibility features and we are working
closely with the accessibility community, and assistive
27 matches
Mail list logo
