On Sunday, Jan 12, 2003, at 09:13 US/Pacific, Mike Brunt wrote:
Yes this is a good methodology to consider as we all move out of
procedural
methodologies to more 'OO' based concepts. Yet in my opinion there is
a
further dimension that Fusebox achieves, or has done for us, that I
have not
Hi everyone,
Thanks for all the positive feedbacks on benorama.com ColdFusion content.
The articles I've put online are a set of Best practices and general design
techniques that I daily used for advanced CFMX application development (in our
company, a collaborative plate-form).
They are
Using Fusebox in conjunction with FLIP we have a complete application
design
and development environment from concept-discussion through coding-ongoing
maintenance.
There is one last very important point here, there have been many previous
methodologies/frameworks applied to ColdFusion
-Original Message-
From: Mike Brunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 12:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Design Pattern Question
Yes this is a good methodology to consider as we all move out of
procedural
methodologies to more 'OO' based concepts. Yet in my opinion
This might be a stupid question, but what's Fusebox? (Sorry, I'm a
newbie in the CF world)
SW
-Original Message-
From: Adrocknaphobia Jones
Sent: Mon 01/13/2003 02:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Cc:
Subject: RE: Design Pattern Question
Sent: Mon 01/13/2003 02:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Cc:
Subject: RE: Design Pattern Question
Not one to start gossip, but I was under the influence that Hal
Helms
left the fusebox group. Is this true? If so why did he leave, if
not,
why
On Monday, Jan 13, 2003, at 11:47 US/Pacific, charlie griefer wrote:
it's a fairly popular design methodology (started with CF, and i
believe has
been ported to PHP).
Yes, my personal site is a PHP Fusebox site (and I will be writing up
my experience in converting it).
Altho I understand
Specialists
-Original Message-
From: charlie griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:48 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Design Pattern Question
Scott Wilhelm writes:
This might be a stupid question, but what's Fusebox? (Sorry, I'm a
newbie in the CF world)
http
At 12:08 PM 1/13/2003, you wrote:
I also know that there is a lot of interest among Flash developers about
Fusebox as a methodology/framework for Flash Application development.
Really? I've never seen anything indicating this--I'd be interested in
reading the archives. Where was it discussed?
I also know that there is a lot of interest among Flash
developers about Fusebox as a methodology/framework for
Flash Application development.
Really? I'd have to take issue with that. Most Flash developers I've met are
much more interested in typical OOP development framework ideas, such as
-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question
I also know that there is a lot of interest among Flash
developers about Fusebox as a methodology/framework for
Flash Application
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Distance Education Division
-Original Message-
From: Mike Brunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question
As far as I understand it Hal Helms is no longer
-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question
I also know that there is a lot of interest among Flash
developers about Fusebox as a methodology/framework for
Flash Application development
was RE: Design Pattern Question
Fusebox is the most widely distributed Framework/Methodology for
developing ColdFusion Applications
What other Framework/Methodologies exist for Cold Fusion?
Is the fuseBox framework/methodology decided by a consortium? Or by a
few elite people?
Adam Wayne Lehman
, January 13, 2003 3:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question
Fusebox is the most widely distributed Framework/Methodology for
developing ColdFusion Applications
What other Framework/Methodologies exist for Cold Fusion?
Is the fuseBox framework/methodology decided
) 933-3651
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.evoch.com/
-Original Message-
From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 4:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question
Fusebox is the most widely distributed
: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question
Fusebox is the most widely distributed Framework/Methodology for
developing ColdFusion Applications
What other Framework/Methodologies exist for Cold Fusion?
Is the fuseBox framework
Fusebox: methodology and techniques but that is now 3
years old and quite out of date
-Original Message-
From: Mosh Teitelbaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 4:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question
There's also cfObjects (http
: Adrocknaphobia Jones
Sent: Mon 01/13/2003 02:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Cc:
Subject: RE: Design Pattern Question
Not one to start gossip, but I was under the influence that Hal
Helms
left the fusebox group. Is this true? If so why did he leave
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question
Adam,
There's one called CF Objects I believe. Plus, everyone has their
own preferred home grown method - everyone who's done more than one
project requiring high level CF code that is.
-Mark
-Original Message
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Design Pattern Question
I think that this is a very healthy design methodology for CF.
Ben Forta has been harping for ages about the importance of separating the
display, application, and data layers from the CF applications.
The methodology outlined in that page presents
On Saturday, Jan 11, 2003, at 20:58 US/Pacific, Cutter (CF_Talk) wrote:
Has anyone here taken a detailed look at the CFMX (semi) OOP design
pattern put forth at http://www.benorama.com? Is anyone here using it?
Formed some opinions? Have anything to add (or subtract)? Know who put
this
Has anyone here taken a detailed look at the CFMX (semi) OOP design
pattern put forth at http://www.benorama.com? Is anyone here using it?
Formed some opinions? Have anything to add (or subtract)? Know who put
this together in the first place?
As one of my former commanders used to ask
: Saturday, January 11, 2003 11:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Design Pattern Question
Has anyone here taken a detailed look at the CFMX (semi) OOP design
pattern put forth at http://www.benorama.com? Is anyone here using it?
Formed some opinions? Have anything to add (or subtract)? Know who put
24 matches
Mail list logo
