On Monday 10 July 2006 18:15, Munson, Jacob wrote:
I understand that logic, but I don't understand why a company
would want to spend the money on BlueDragon.NET when they are
already coding everything in .NET.
True, but say you've got a beloved CF app in your company. You're
manager was
Does anybody know of an overview page of the myspace technical setup.
I've heard they have a huge software team, that they are moving to .net,
and a few other random things. I'm curious to how their operation runs
day to day in the web development department. URL's make it look like
fusebox 3
I'll be honest and say that they have lots of cash and throw money and servers
at a problem rather than tight code. I've talked to them in the past about
different things on the site and the results have been all of nothing. Of
course this was before the move to bluedragon (from CF 5) so things
Here you go:
http://blog.mix06.com/virtualmix/archive/2006/03/17/MySpace_demo.aspx.
They spoke semi-detailed at Mix this year.
On 7/10/06, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll be honest and say that they have lots of cash and throw money and
servers at a problem rather than tight
In talking with several NewAtlanta folks during CFUnited:
Upside: Most pages have a .cfm extension
Downside: More and more templates contain nothing more than a cfinclude
to an .aspx file
It's become rather obvious that, rather than leveraging the power of
ColdFusion, the move to
It's become rather obvious that, rather than leveraging the power of
ColdFusion, the move to BlueDragon.NET stems from their
desire to slowly
migrate their codebase from CF to .NET, without having to rewrite
everything at once. This is not to say that there aren't great things
coming
Why try MX when Microsoft was ready to hold their hands in getting their
site ready for Vista. That video was interesting.
Lessons learned I guess. Adobe, get your new products in the hands of your
big clients with public facing websites and you might get in on the next
MySpace ;-)
Casey
On
On Monday 10 July 2006 15:53, Casey Dougall wrote:
Lessons learned I guess. Adobe, get your new products in the hands of your
It occurs to me that if MySpace2 want to do the whole thing in Flex2, they
could do so, for free (on the grounds they wouldn't need FDS).
They needn't have a CF backend
I have been saying I haven't seen a point in Bluedragon.NET except as a
stepping stone to get off of ColdFusion to go to .NET. Why spend as much as CF
Enterprise just to be able to use .NET and that's all. If you're programmers
are learning .NET then it would make sense to transition the entire
Well in october BlueDragon will have cfthread, that was a cool tag. They
have also stated their is a big performance gain by using BD on the .NET
side. I have never used it so you got me...
Session management was kinda cool too. I guess in Bluedragon 7 you can
recycle an instance without loosing
I have been saying I haven't seen a point in Bluedragon.NET
except as a stepping stone to get off of ColdFusion to go to
.NET. Why spend as much as CF Enterprise just to be able to
use .NET and that's all. If you're programmers are learning
.NET then it would make sense to transition the
I don't know this from experience, but I've heard people say that BD.
Net
can be useful in a business that is running .Net for most everything
else, but you still want to use ColdFusion. That way you can run on
the
same app server as all the other apps.
I understand that logic, but I
I understand that logic, but I don't understand why a company
would want to spend the money on BlueDragon.NET when they are
already coding everything in .NET.
True, but say you've got a beloved CF app in your company. You're
manager was recently convinced that .Net is the way to go, and he
We looked into BD.NET to be able to maintain a beloved CFM app while the
higher ups were pushing to no CF servers and only .NET ones. If we did it
though, we would eventually end up just migrating things to .NET over time.
On 7/10/06, Munson, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand that
True, but say you've got a beloved CF app in your company. You're
manager was recently convinced that .Net is the way to go, and he
wants
to convert all company apps to .Net. If you use BD.Net you have a
chance of convincing him to keep this app in CF.
Yeah, but why do you have to use
Yeah, but why do you have to use Bluedragon.NET? If you
already purchased CF, then what is the point of then buying
Bluedragon.NET? From your description it sounds like it would
be a seperate app that wouldn't be tied into the other apps,
so there wouldn't be a need to integrate into
Especially if they want features only available in .net
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 July 2006 18:40
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MySpace - How they do it: Staff, Software Servers
Yeah, but why do you have to use Bluedragon.NET? If you already
advantage of coming bundled with Windows and thus
seems like the obvious choice if you're a manager who could care less
about CF.
John Burns
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 1:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MySpace - How they do
It's become rather obvious that, rather than leveraging the power of
ColdFusion, the move to BlueDragon.NET stems from their desire to slowly
migrate their codebase from CF to .NET, without having to rewrite
everything at once. This is not to say that there aren't great things
coming out of
19 matches
Mail list logo
