Query Caching Question

2003-01-16 Thread Joshua Miller
Ok, I've been reading up on query caching today and I think I've run into something that may cause me problems unless there is a way to dynamically name queries. I have an application that houses data for multiple sites - the data is referenced by a siteID that is set as a session variable. So

RE: Query Caching Question

2003-01-16 Thread Raymond Camden
PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:25 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Query Caching Question Ok, I've been reading up on query caching today and I think I've run into something that may cause me problems unless there is a way to dynamically name queries. I have an application

RE: Query Caching Question

2003-01-16 Thread Owens, Howard
. -Original Message- From: Joshua Miller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:25 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Query Caching Question Ok, I've been reading up on query caching today and I think I've run into something that may cause me problems unless there is a way

Re: Query Caching Question

2003-01-16 Thread jon hall
I believe you may be getting the scopes confused. Cached querys are for most intents and purposes stored in some place equivalent to the application scope. Your query also suggests that the information being pulled is specific to the application, not the user (session). If there is not any

RE: Query Caching Question

2003-01-16 Thread Jim Davis
Well, you can't dynamically name queries, but remember that query caching requires the EXACT same SQL to be used. So if you do this: cfquery name=qGetSite cachedwithin... SELECT sitename FROM tblSites WHERE siteID=#session.siteID# /cfquery Then you'll cache each query using a different siteid.

Re: Query Caching Question

2003-01-16 Thread paul smith
I'm not sure I understand your circumstances, but if one user has siteID=20 and another one has siteID=123, the query below will cache 2 record sets. Happens all the time at www.SMARTERyellowpages.com (MANY cached queries there) best, paul At 01:24 PM 1/16/03 -0500, you wrote: Ok, I've been