Re: A Positive for DW2004

2003-09-17 Thread Kevin Graeme
] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 7:40 PM Subject: Re: A Positive for DW2004 I've never found that to be the case. Opening and editing documents, yes CFS was faster than DWMX, Find and Replace, I found the performance on par, or in some cases better with DWMX. I'm about to do some wide scale

Re: A Positive for DW2004

2003-09-16 Thread Massimo, Tiziana e Federica
I've done my share of DW bashing so let me give credit where it's due. The new search and replace rox !! Apart from the ability to search inside selected text and a bigger GUI, it's exactly the same as it was in DW MX :-) I keep saying it vastly superior to the one in Homesite/CF Studio since

RE: A Positive for DW2004

2003-09-16 Thread Adam Reynolds
Which is what CF Studio had all along. -Original Message- From: Massimo, Tiziana e Federica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 16 September 2003 07:24 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: A Positive for DW2004 I've done my share of DW bashing so let me give credit where it's due. The new

Re: A Positive for DW2004

2003-09-16 Thread Massimo Foti
Which is what CF Studio had all along. Sure, but there are features inside DW's Find Replace that are totally unnmatched elsewhere, not only in CF Studio, but in any similar tool on the market (they had been there since many releases). To get a feeling for what I am talking about, try:

RE: A Positive for DW2004

2003-09-16 Thread Stacy Young
Ya but in 2004 its also showing the line of text with the target underlined...I don't remember seeing that in MX lol. Stace -Original Message- From: Massimo Foti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 16, 2003 9:43 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: A Positive for DW2004 Which is what CF

Re: A Positive for DW2004

2003-09-16 Thread Massimo Foti
Ya but in 2004 its also showing the line of text with the target underlined...I don't remember seeing that in MX lol. Ya, in DW MX it wasn't underlined :-))) Massimo Foti Certified Dreamweaver MX Developer Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer

RE: A Positive for DW2004

2003-09-16 Thread Stacy Young
A-Ha! Gotcha! Not EXACTLY the same LOL ;-) -Original Message- From: Massimo Foti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: September 16, 2003 12:07 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: A Positive for DW2004 Ya but in 2004 its also showing the line of text with the target underlined...I don't remember

Re: A Positive for DW2004

2003-09-16 Thread Calvin Ward
, with unnecessary directories cloaked (unlike CFS). CFS has nothing on DWMX Find and Replace. - Calvin - Original Message - From: Massimo Foti [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 9:42 AM Subject: Re: A Positive for DW2004 Which is what CF

Re: A Positive for DW2004

2003-09-16 Thread Kevin Graeme
I love the search/replace features of DWMX, but I disagree with this: CFS has nothing on DWMX Find and Replace. CFS/Homesite+ is much, much, much faster at actually doing the search/replace. DWMX is painfully slow. I haven't yet tried 2004, but I haven't heard as a new feature that the search

Re: A Positive for DW2004

2003-09-16 Thread Calvin Ward
if it is better. - Calvin - Original Message - From: Kevin Graeme [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 7:55 PM Subject: Re: A Positive for DW2004 I love the search/replace features of DWMX, but I disagree with this: CFS has nothing on DWMX