]
Sent: 06 November 2002 01:00
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ActivePDF (web grabber) and CFMX does not work.
I have used the ActivePDF Toolkit w/ CFMX without any problems at all.
I don't know about the rest of the other ActivePDF products, though.
At 05:53 PM 11/5/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Last I
Its the web Grabber I need to use.
Thankfully I run under IIS so I created an ASP page to do the web capture.
Seems to be the easiest thing to do in the circumstances while MM get there
COM stuff sorted out.
I actually disagree with your last statement for a couple of reasons.
First, it's not
At 10:34 AM 11/6/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Its the web Grabber I need to use.
Thankfully I run under IIS so I created an ASP page to do the web capture.
Seems to be the easiest thing to do in the circumstances while MM get there
COM stuff sorted out.
I actually disagree with your last
November 2002 15:34
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ActivePDF (web grabber) and CFMX does not work.
Its the web Grabber I need to use.
Thankfully I run under IIS so I created an ASP page to do the
web capture.
Seems to be the easiest thing to do in the circumstances while
MM get there
COM
running htmldoc.
my 2c Dave
-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:cbetta;hotmail.com]
Sent: 06 November 2002 15:34
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ActivePDF (web grabber) and CFMX does not work.
Its the web Grabber I need to use.
Thankfully I run under IIS so I created an ASP page to do
Division
-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:cbetta;hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:34 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ActivePDF (web grabber) and CFMX does not work.
Its the web Grabber I need to use.
Thankfully I run under IIS so I created an ASP page to do
My installation of ActivePDF Toolkit works without any know problems as
long as I have not installed the MX updater. Have you installed the MX
Updater? If so you might want to uninstall it (per MM grueling
instructions) or reinstall CFMX. The updater is supposed to have fixed a
bunch of COM issues
At 11:45 AM 11/6/2002 -0500, you wrote:
I'd like to know where you read that MS said they were not using COM
again.
I don't have a place to quote, but..
If you search the archives, you'll find a nice post by Dave Watts on the
subject.
I believe that Macromedia uses J-intrega from
grabber) and CFMX does not work.
My installation of ActivePDF Toolkit works without any know problems as
long as I have not installed the MX updater. Have you installed the MX
Updater? If so you might want to uninstall it (per MM grueling
instructions) or reinstall CFMX. The updater is supposed to have
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ActivePDF (web grabber) and CFMX does not work.
At 11:45 AM 11/6/2002 -0500, you wrote:
I'd like to know where you read that MS said they were not using COM
again.
I don't have a place to quote, but..
If you search the archives, you'll find a nice post by Dave Watts
.
http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/windows/story/0,10801,46591,0
0.html
-Original Message-
From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:adrocknatalk;hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 11:26 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ActivePDF (web grabber) and CFMX does not work.
COM
At 02:25 PM 11/6/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Again, with no proof of COM being axed on MS.com, I have to say that
your facts have been skewed by MM and Fig Leaf.
Actually, just for the record I didn't present any facts with regards to
COM being axed. I only stated that it had previously been
]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 3:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ActivePDF (web grabber) and CFMX does not work.
Microsoft is de-emphasizing COM, said James Kobielus, an analyst at
The
Burton Group in Alexandria, Va. Very few people are using DCOM for the
Internet. But Dwight Davis
06, 2002 1:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ActivePDF (web grabber) and CFMX does not work.
Ok. COM and DCOM are not the same thing. This article is pretty
interesting, although it was written over two years ago; way before .NET
was released. .NET still utilizes COM, and in fact MS recommends using
COM is NOT being abandoned by MS. Dave and Steve failed to back that
statement up in the last thread.
Sorry I couldn't respond within your timeframe, but: (Watch for the wrap)
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vbasic/techinfo/articles/upgrade/entupgrade.asp
Straight from the horse's mouth:
.NET
Last I check ActivePDF used a COM object. CFMX doesn't jive well with
COM NEmore. I talked to the activePDF guys at devCon and they said we're
your best bet is to setup a separate server with CF5. They didn't really
seem like they were even planning on resolving the issues.
You know there are a
I have used the ActivePDF Toolkit w/ CFMX without any problems at all.
I don't know about the rest of the other ActivePDF products, though.
At 05:53 PM 11/5/2002 -0500, you wrote:
Last I check ActivePDF used a COM object. CFMX doesn't jive well with
COM NEmore. I talked to the activePDF guys
17 matches
Mail list logo
