Isn't it also appropriate to define and communicate the value that is
possible (or not) with the additional features/performance of one product
over another to the business?
In other words, aside from features that 'developers want to play with',
there are features and benefits that may be
It might be useful to determine your business needs as opposite to what
features developers want to play with. If you have no use for the
additional features in your project(s) it might be a decision based on
emotions instead of rational arguments and the extra investment might
never pay itself
8:38
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Enterprise Edition vs. CF Standard Edition
It might be useful to determine your business needs as opposite to what
features developers want to play with. If you have no use for the
additional features in your project(s) it might be a decision based on
emotions
two words: asynchronous gateway
We are looking at moving up to MX7 from MX6.1 Standard.
How would you sell the idea of moving from Standard to
Enterprise? What are the compelling reasons for spending
the extra cash on Enterprise? Purse strings are fairly
tight here, but with a well defined
In Texas that's three words.
On 5/19/05, S. Isaac Dealey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
two words: asynchronous gateway
We are looking at moving up to MX7 from MX6.1 Standard.
How would you sell the idea of moving from Standard to
Enterprise? What are the compelling reasons for spending
the
We are looking at moving up to MX7 from MX6.1 Standard. How
would you sell the idea of moving from Standard to
Enterprise? What are the compelling reasons for spending the
extra cash on Enterprise? Purse strings are fairly tight
here, but with a well defined argument it is not
If you hook to Oracle, you really need Enterprise.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ketsdever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 10:49 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CF Enterprise Edition vs. CF Standard Edition
We are looking at moving up to MX7 from MX6.1 Standard. How
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 11:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Enterprise Edition vs. CF Standard Edition
We are looking at moving up to MX7 from MX6.1 Standard. How
would you sell the idea of moving from Standard to
Enterprise? What are the compelling reasons
We do run Oracle and we are looking for real life experiences as to why, what
advantages have you experienced by moving to or using Enterprise.
We have at least four versions of Oracle running
8.1.6
8.1.7
8.6
9.2
Connie
If you hook to Oracle, you really need Enterprise.
Confidentiality
If you hook to Oracle, you really need Enterprise.
No, not necessarily. You may be able to get what you need with Oracle's own
JDBC drivers. I seem to recall hearing about problems with the Oracle thin
client and BLOB/CLOB fields, but you could also use the Oracle OCI JDBC
driver.
Of course,
We are actually doing that now. However, we thought someone
might bring something up that we've not thought of or be able
to identify a use of a particular feature that has resulted
in a huge time / money / job / sanity saving development.
I'm a big fan of the multiserver deployment
There are quite a few performance differences. Do you do a lot of cfmail?
- Calvin
On 5/19/05 1:48 PM, Ken Ketsdever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are looking at moving up to MX7 from MX6.1 Standard. How would you sell
the idea of moving from Standard to Enterprise? What are the compelling
Good thing I'm in ft lauderdale. :)
a syncrhonous or gate way?
In Texas that's three words.
On 5/19/05, S. Isaac Dealey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
two words: asynchronous gateway
We are looking at moving up to MX7 from MX6.1 Standard.
How would you sell the idea of moving from Standard
Standard does not come with Oracle drivers.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ketsdever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 11:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Enterprise Edition vs. CF Standard Edition
We do run Oracle and we are looking for real life experiences
Edition vs. CF Standard Edition
There are quite a few performance differences. Do you do a lot of cfmail?
- Calvin
On 5/19/05 1:48 PM, Ken Ketsdever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are looking at moving up to MX7 from MX6.1 Standard. How would you sell
the idea of moving from Standard
Enterprise Edition vs. CF Standard Edition
Standard does not come with Oracle drivers.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ketsdever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 11:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Enterprise Edition vs. CF Standard Edition
We do run Oracle and we
of CFMAIL with time. Including an application
to send out 25,000 e-mail based newsletters at least once a month.
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2005 11:50 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Enterprise Edition vs. CF Standard Edition
17 matches
Mail list logo
