index.cfm: about 17,600,000
index.asp: about 16,600,000
Looks like an open and shut case.
:)
Cheers
Bert
ps and after a quick check (google on site:www.mysite.com) i reckon
about 4% of those 17 million are mine!
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:59:48 +, Mark Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found
And keep in mind that over 80% of CF use is internal stuff, behind
firewalls, stuff Google will never see.
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Bert Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 8:43 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Coldfusion VS ASP.NET use
index.cfm
How about .aspx?
-Original Message-
From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 8:48 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Coldfusion VS ASP.NET use
And keep in mind that over 80% of CF use is internal stuff, behind
firewalls, stuff Google will never see.
--- Ben
And the fact the asp uses Default.asp a lot of the time.
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 February 2005 13:51
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Coldfusion VS ASP.NET use
How about .aspx?
-Original Message-
From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Recall that many asp sites use default.asp ... not index.asp, whereas CF's
index.cfm is far more standard.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 7:48 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Coldfusion VS ASP.NET use
And keep in mind
10:01 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Coldfusion VS ASP.NET use
Recall that many asp sites use default.asp ... not index.asp, whereas CF's
index.cfm is far more standard.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 7:48 AM
To: CF-Talk
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Coldfusion VS ASP.NET use
And keep in mind that over 80% of CF use is internal stuff, behind
firewalls, stuff Google will never see.
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Bert Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 8:43 AM
To: CF-Talk
:.aspx. (0.08 seconds)
Results 1 - 10 of about 129,000,000 for inurl:.cfm. (0.28 seconds)
-Original Message-
From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 10:01 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Coldfusion VS ASP.NET use
Recall that many asp sites use
: Friday, February 04, 2005 8:43 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Coldfusion VS ASP.NET use
index.cfm: about 17,600,000
index.asp: about 16,600,000
Looks like an open and shut case.
:)
Cheers
Bert
ps and after a quick check (google on site:www.mysite.com) i
reckon about 4% of those 17
Searching 'fuseaction' in google turns up 12,700,000.
A lot of pages from US Senate and House. The gov't clearly endorses Fusebox
and CF. Hmmm, is this a good thing? ;)
Mark
That means that there are bigger sites for CFM?
how about fusebox? each site would be index.cfm and that is pretty
for those?
Vince
-Original Message-
From: Bert Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 8:43 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Coldfusion VS ASP.NET use
index.cfm: about 17,600,000
index.asp: about 16,600,000
Looks like an open and shut case
}
-Original Message-
From: Bert Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 8:43 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Coldfusion VS ASP.NET use
index.cfm: about 17,600,000
index.asp: about 16,600,000
Surely this is abundantly obvious, ASP/.NET has a much larger
saturation than CF, you don't need to google to know that...just open
your eyes a little.
--
Neil
http://www.theservicefactory.com
Get Firefox - http://www.getfirefox.com
-Original Message-
From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 9:57 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Coldfusion VS ASP.NET use
Recall that many asp sites use default.asp ... not index.asp, whereas
CF's
index.cfm is far more standard.
Although some
And keep in mind that over 80% of CF use is internal stuff,
behind firewalls, stuff Google will never see.
Isn't that equally true for every other web application server technology?
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber
extrapolation of total use based on public facing use.
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 12:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Coldfusion VS ASP.NET use
And keep in mind that over 80% of CF use is internal stuff, behind
firewalls
I'm gonna be a good boy and stay out of this one!
:)
Will
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a
client with
Good idea ;)
Rey...
- Original Message -
From: Will Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: Coldfusion VS ASP.NET use
I'm gonna be a good boy and stay out of this one
he he me 2!
that damn glorified frontpage junk! hahaha
From: Will Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 3:33 PM
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Subject: Re: Coldfusion VS ASP.NET use
I'm gonna be a good boy and stay out
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 1:47 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Coldfusion VS ASP.NET use
Dave, honestly, I don't think anyone really knows the answer
to that one.
But it is clear that some technologies tend to be used less
in internal corporate development (PHP
too me its like this, ms has a tendency to drop things everytime someone has
something new (look no futher than asp or google type searches or anti-spyware,
which is hilarious because their browser installs the spyware then u gotta pay
them to buy their ani-spyware to get rid of it and make
You'll never see any of my stuff, we have a HUGE CF intranet, but no
one will ever know about it except for me talking about it
Adam H
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:42:03 -0500, dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
too me its like this, ms has a tendency to drop things everytime someone has
something
Just a comment:
Personally, I wouldn't spend any of my professional time learning C#. I predict it
will be just a few short years before Microsoft once again orphans it's own product
and throws away C# for some other buzzword that has strategic and marketing value at
the time.
At 04:45 PM
I think just about everyone hates Dallas now, but I'm partial
living in the D.C. area.
It's a pretty nice area, I think.
By the way, your clustering lesson at the DC CFUG last week was
excellent.
Thanks! I'm glad you enjoyed it!
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
I must confess that my original concern seems to be so
adequately captured by Dave Watts' insight into how Microsoft
operates. Yes the market for web application servers is
competitive, and for someone (like myself) who keeps falling
back on CF as a prefered development platform, reading
T was formerly known as ASP+
Jeremy Allen
ElliptIQ Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Philip Arnold - ASP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 9:59 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion vs. ASP.NET
It's hard to compare an existing product with one that doesn't
Why is it..
Everyone insists on considering ASP.NET etc vapor ware...?
You can download pretty functional beta's of the software.
Based on my previous experience with Microsoft betas, there are likely to be
very significant changes between now and the final release.
In any case, I think
e, build, and test .NET applications: ASP.NET,
the Common Language Runtime, documentation, samples, tools,
and command line compilers."
ASP.NET was formerly known as ASP+
Jeremy Allen
ElliptIQ Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Philip Arnold - ASP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
GeeI wonder why?
At 10:44 AM 12/11/00 -0600, you wrote:
Not to mention the fact
that if the technology belongs to any companies out of Redmond, the
negativity seems to double.
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the
Everyone insists on considering ASP.NET etc vapor ware...?
You can download pretty functional beta's of the software.
To me that makes it a little more than "vaporware". Just
my opinon but the beta's are rather useable and you can get
ahold of them now.
I wasn't INSISTING that ASP.NET was
hehe.. I think it's funny slamming on Microsoft products in here. If
everyone who ran ColdFusion on NT left the list, how many would be
left.
It just occurred to me that MS is the Dallas Cowboys of the software
industry.. you either love em or hate em .. no in-between.
For an interesting
hehe.. I think it's funny slamming on Microsoft products in
here. If everyone who ran ColdFusion on NT left the list, how
many would be left.
It just occurred to me that MS is the Dallas Cowboys of the
software industry.. you either love em or hate em .. no
in-between.
I generally
TECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 3:07 PM
Subject: RE: ColdFusion vs. ASP.NET
hehe.. I think it's funny slamming on Microsoft products in
here. If everyone who ran ColdFusion on NT left the list, how
many would be left.
It just occurred to me that MS is the Dallas Cowboys of the
sof
-
From: "Dave Watts" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 6:37 AM
Subject: RE: ColdFusion vs. ASP.NET
: hehe.. I think it's funny slamming on Microsoft products in
: here. If everyone who ran ColdFusion on NT left the l
CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 7:37 PM
Subject: Re: ColdFusion vs. ASP.NET
I must confess that my original concern seems to be so adequately captured
by Dave Watt's insight into how Microsoft operates. Yes the market for web
application servers is competitive, a
The recent thread of discussion on CF vs PHP/ASP is pretty
old hat by now. I thought I might throw in something that
hasn't been mentioned yet. Does anyone have any opinion how
CF 4.5 will compete with ASP.NET (previously called ASP+)
when MS releases it next year? Will CF's next major
36 matches
Mail list logo
