RE: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-06 Thread Joe Eugene
Design To: CF-Talk Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:53 AM Subject: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 What are other people's views on this - how many people are using MX with no problems? You wrote I suggest the user

RE: (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-04 Thread Bill Grover
/ http://www.euservices.com __ -Original Message- From: Ryan Sabir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:46 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re:(CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 Hi all, I have recently

Re: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-04 Thread Tom Kitta
Design To: CF-Talk Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:53 AM Subject: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 What are other people's views on this - how many people are using MX with no problems? You wrote I suggest the user with problems

RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-03 Thread Tom Jordahl
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:44 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 Well we have major issues with our server locking up every day.EVERY Day. We've applied the SQL Patch,where you revert to the drivers used in 6.0. We've seen jrun.exe grow day after day

Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-03 Thread Doug White
with my service, my job isn't done! - Original Message - From: Tom Jordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:24 PM Subject: RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 | | You need to work through Macromedia Technical Support. | | We are listening

[Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-03 Thread Boldacious Web Design
What are other people's views on this - how many people are using MX with no problems? You wrote I suggest the user with problems with the server product, to uninstall it completely and revert to CF 5.0, until Macromedia gets its act together.While a lot was

Re: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-03 Thread Doug White
isn't done! - Original Message - From: Boldacious Web Design [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:53 AM Subject: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 | What are other people's views on this - how many people

Re: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-03 Thread Ken Wilson
Might be easier to ask how many people are having serious problems with MX. Ken Boldacious Web Design wrote: What are other people's views on this - how many people are using MX with no problems? You wrote I suggest the user with problems with the

RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-03 Thread Tom Jordahl
PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:37 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 Macromedia was enthusiastic in responding to issues when 6.1 was first released, and now it appears that they have gone back into their shell.Contacting Tech support has likewise reverted back

Re:(CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-03 Thread Ryan Sabir
Hi all, I have recently installed CFMX 6.1 in a high traffic production environment, and I can say that I haven't experienced this memory leak problem. I am getting quite a few deadlock errors and service too busy error, but I suspect thats an issue with the questionable code that we inherited.

Re: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-03 Thread Brook Davies
CMFX has been running really well for us since the 6.1 release. No complaints about stability. Brook At 03:53 AM 11/4/2003, you wrote: What are other people's views on this - how many people are using MX with no problems? You wrote I suggest the user with

RE: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-03 Thread Jim Davis
So far it's been fine for me - no problems I can't trace to my own stupidity. Jim Davis -Original Message- From: Boldacious Web Design [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:54 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k

RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-03 Thread Stacy Young
. Stace _ From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: November 3, 2003 7:37 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 Macromedia was enthusiastic in responding to issues when 6.1 was first released, and now it appears that they have gone back into their shell. Contacting

RE: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-03 Thread Stacy Young
To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 So far it's been fine for me - no problems I can't trace to my own stupidity. Jim Davis -Original Message- From: Boldacious Web Design [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11

RE: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-03 Thread peter . tillbrook
Yeah and I've been using CF for 8 years now. Obviously over time you learn much more and need to adapt more. Important:This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is confidential, commercially valuable or subject to legal or parliamentary privilege.If

RE: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-03 Thread peter . tillbrook
You will love Oracle 10g then! Important:This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is confidential, commercially valuable or subject to legal or parliamentary privilege.If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that any review,

RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-01 Thread Stacy Young
Sorry I haven't seen the whole thread...but perhaps this would help: http://www.bpurcell.org/blog/index.cfm?mode=entryentry=967 -Stace _ From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: November 1, 2003 1:44 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 Well we have major issues

RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-10-31 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
Are you running SQL Server? If so, then there is a known issue in the SQL Drivers used in 6.1try and regress back to the drivers used in CFMX U3 and see if it makes any difference. See if this matches your issues... http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/cfmx61_sqlserver_c

RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-10-31 Thread cf-talk
Michael, I've been running 2003 and MX6.1 for a long time now and no problems I did a fresh install of the box and fresh install of MX... did you do an upgrade or something?I'm just trying to identify any differences for you. -Novak -Original Message- From: Michael Kear

Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-10-31 Thread Joe Eugene
mentioned they might look into putting a BUG Database together, dont think this was every worked out. Joe Eugene - Original Message - From: cf-talk To: CF-Talk Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 11:31 AM Subject: RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 Michael, I've been running 2003 and MX6.1

Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-10-31 Thread Adam Churvis
] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 1:49 PM Subject: Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 I think there is a Major Issue with CFMX 6.1 DataBase Connections. The Connection pooling Engine seems to have Changed from CFMX 6.0 and most the posts point to reverting back to OLD Drivers. I am Not sure if the MM

RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-10-31 Thread Mike Kear
memory leaks.Bout time you owned up to it isn't it? Cheers, Michael Kear Windsor, NSW, Australia AFP Webworks. -Original Message- From: Adam Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, 1 November 2003 6:02 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 Check