-Original Message-
From: David McGraw [mailto:david.mcg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 11:54 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Memory Upgrade - Revisited
There is something wrong with the idea of using such a beastly
web-server
with an Access DB backend, upgrade your DB while you
On 10/21/2010 6:42 AM, Steve LaBadie wrote:
Just to be clear my assumptions are correct that I do not need to
purchase the Enterprise version in order to utilize the memory?
-Original Message-
From: David McGraw [mailto:david.mcg...@gmail.com]
There is something wrong with the
, and in my experience it usually works
flawlessly. Cheaper options, like MySQL, will require more effort to migrate
to, but still worth doing.
--- Ben
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:h...@ilsweb.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 10:03 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Memory Upgrade
, October 20, 2010 11:54 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Memory Upgrade - Revisited
There is something wrong with the idea of using such a beastly
web-server
with an Access DB backend, upgrade your DB while you are at it.
Regards,
David McGraw
Oyova Software, LLC
http://www.oyova.com
On Wed
Subject: RE: Memory Upgrade - Revisited
I know others have said this already, but it's worth reiterating. Database
access is almost always an application bottleneck, especially for highly
data-centric apps like the typical ColdFusion app. Microsoft Access *will*
be a choke point for your app
Just to be clear my assumptions are correct that I do not need to
purchase the Enterprise version in order to utilize the memory?
CF 9 Standard is available in a 64-bit version for Windows. You must
also be running a 64-bit Windows OS, obviously. I believe you can
still use Access from a
slaba...@po-box.esu.edu
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 11:30 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Memory Upgrade - Revisited
Just to be clear my assumptions are correct that I do not need to
purchase the Enterprise version
I have just been informed by my system admin that we are only upgrading
to server 2003 enterprise not to 2008. So CF 9 32-bit will be the way to
go at this juncture.
I think that 2003 is available in a 64-bit version.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Memory Upgrade - Revisited
I have just been informed by my system admin that we are only
upgrading
to server 2003 enterprise not to 2008. So CF 9 32-bit will be the way
to
go at this juncture.
I think that 2003 is available in a 64-bit version.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig
University
200 Prospect St.
East Stroudsburg, Pa 18301
570-422-3999
http://www.esu.edu
slaba...@po-box.esu.edu
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 12:09 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Memory Upgrade - Revisited
I have just
...@gmail.com]
Sent: 21 October 2010 17:47
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Memory Upgrade - Revisited
We have 32-bit hardware.
Bummer, that means you will be limited to 4gigs total on the box and only
about 1.4gigs allocated to ColdFusion
=\
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Steve LaBadie
slaba...@po
There is something wrong with the idea of using such a beastly web-server
with an Access DB backend, upgrade your DB while you are at it.
Regards,
David McGraw
Oyova Software, LLC
http://www.oyova.com
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Steve LaBadie slaba...@po-box.esu.eduwrote:
We
-Original Message-
From: David McGraw [mailto:david.mcg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 11:54 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Memory Upgrade - Revisited
There is something wrong with the idea of using such a beastly
web-server
with an Access DB backend, upgrade your DB while you
If you are only using the data tables in Access and not any of the
reports or forms, you can upsize the tables to MSSQL in just a few
minutes with the upsize tool.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Steve LaBadie slaba...@po-box.esu.edu wrote:
I have a couple of Access DB's (which were done
14 matches
Mail list logo
