afaik, all modern search engines can read and spider ANY url.
-Original Message-
From: Stan Winchester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 March 2004 02:15
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SES CFLIB UDF ParseURLData
I have a client who needs search engine safe URL's. Has anyone
had any
On Wednesday 03 Mar 2004 13:37 pm, Craig Dudley wrote:
afaik, all modern search engines can read and spider ANY url.
Yes, but google for instance will apperently mark down a page whos URL
contains '?', if it came from a page whos URL contains '?'.
Plus I think SES-type URLs look nicer.
--
Tom
Matter of opinion as to wether they look nicer, tbh I hate them and
always have ;-)
imo a url should be short and sweet.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 March 2004 13:55
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SES CFLIB UDF ParseURLData
On Wednesday 03 Mar 2004 14:08 pm, Craig Dudley wrote:
imo a url should be short and sweet.
So why would you prefer
http://www.host.tld/index.cfm?top=homeside=offerOfTheDay
to
http://www.host.tld/home/offerOfTheDay
?
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
Tel: +44(0)1749 834997
I wouldn't like either of those formats
The only thing I ever pass on a url in a public site is a single numeric
id, and even that is rare.
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 March 2004 15:12
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SES CFLIB UDF ParseURLData
On Wednesday 03 Mar
Does anyone have any thoughts on my first questions, which is: Has anyone had any experience good or bad with the UDF ParseURLData found at: http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm?ID=378 ? I have tested it locally on my XP Pro/CFMX dev box and it seems to work nicely. Peter suggested the sesConverter
Google will only index an Url with a ? IF it comes from a static page (i.e.
one without a ?). This means that if your entire site is dynamic other than
the index.cfm, then your in trouble index wise. SES urls is a MUST when
dealing with highly dynamic sites. The HoF archives are all dynamic and
with IIS, but CFMX will. I'm not sure about other web servers...
Cheers
Bert
-Original Message-
From: Stan Winchester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 March 2004 15:59
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SES CFLIB UDF ParseURLData
Does anyone have any thoughts on my first questions
Thank you! Based on what you say, I think the SESconverter will be what I use since I can mix and match if needed. I also apprectiate the insite to the CF5 MX handle SES and server logs.
I haven't used the ParseURLData UDF, but it seems to do more or less
the same as SESconverter, except that
I just tried sesConverter from Fusium. It seems to work on Fusebox
applications also:
http://www.fusium.com/
(Look under Tools menu).
Cheers!
Peter Tilbrook
Transitional Services - Enterprise eSolutions
Centrelink (http://www.centrelink.gov.au)
2 Faulding Street
Symonston ACT 2609
Tel: (02)
10 matches
Mail list logo