RE: Verity vs. Lucene

2005-02-17 Thread Tom Jordahl
Yes, PDF on Solaris works much better in CFMX 7. Tom Jordahl Macromedia Server Development -Original Message- From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:36 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Verity vs. Lucene With luck it now searches PDF on Solaris

RE: Verity vs. Lucene

2005-02-16 Thread James Holmes
One of the problems with Lucene is that you need to supply your own parsers. CF Verity includes parsers for many of the common formats (even more in CF7). -Original Message- From: Bob Clingan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2005 10:38 To: CF-Talk Subject: Verity

RE: Verity vs. Lucene

2005-02-16 Thread Tom Jordahl
Lucene is OK, if you want to index text and HTML in English. There is a tag, CF_Lindex, out there somewhere (in a MM DRK I think) that gives you a reasonable tag set that matches the built in one. But if you are using CFMX, check out the new features available in CFMX 7: Spelling correction,

Re: Verity vs. Lucene

2005-02-16 Thread Paul Hastings
Tom Jordahl wrote: But if you are using CFMX, check out the new features available in CFMX 7: Spelling correction, categorization, result highlighting, improved search results, etc. and of course it now searches unicode

RE: Verity vs. Lucene

2005-02-16 Thread James Holmes
With luck it now searches PDF on Solaris without rebooting CF, but I have yet to test this. -Original Message- From: Paul Hastings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 17 February 2005 2:32 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Verity vs. Lucene Tom Jordahl wrote: But if you are using CFMX

Re: Verity vs. Lucene

2005-02-16 Thread Adam Churvis
You may want to contact New Atlanta about Lucene. If my memory serves me correctly, they use it for the CFSEARCH functionality in BlueDragon, so they should be quite knowledgeable about it. They should at least be able to refer you to the right sources. Respectfully, Adam Phillip Churvis