RE: Website vs. IIS

2001-06-18 Thread Dylan Bromby
Michael; We've used Website Pro since 1.0 in 1996. We're up to 2.5.4 now. For the past several months we've been running IIS 5.0 on new boxes in the server farm rather than upgrade to Website Pro 3.0. We have a few sites that would cause threading issues with Website. After moving them to IIS

RE: Website vs. IIS

2001-06-18 Thread Dennis Powers
Mike, With out bashing IIS, the reason I still and will continue to use Website is because IIS requires too much time to maintain and secure against all the script kiddies. Based on the post from Bob Denny in the new website email list I am confident that it will continue as a viable software

Re: Website vs. IIS

2001-06-18 Thread Michael Dinowitz
I tend to run a very secure ship, even at home behind my firewall. I'm going to look at the package you mentioned but I've user Whisker from RFP to do my security scans and I'm tight. It's less a security thing as a stability and feature one. Could you forward me Bob's post and/or the location

RE: Website vs. IIS

2001-06-18 Thread Dennis Powers
PROTECTED] with the word join or subscribe in the body. Best Regards, Dennis Powers UXB Internet (203) 879-2844 http://www.uxbinfo.com/ -Original Message- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 11:34 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Website vs. IIS I tend