On Thursday 15 September 2005 17:01, Matt Robertson wrote:
I have done that, but they have to be running on different ports.
The J2EE version's will run in the same container, but at different context
roots though, I would guess.
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Your experience of Bluedragon.net?
On Thursday 15 September 2005 17:01, Matt Robertson wrote:
I have done that, but they have to be running on different ports.
The J2EE version's will run in the same container, but at different context
roots though, I would guess
This is good stuff guy's, thanks. If I understand correctly Bluedragon can be
configured on a per site basis so my next question is has anyone had Bluedragon
Coldfusion running on the same server or have I completely got the wrong end
of the stick?
i guess you didnt get the invite :) to the ceremony
That's kind of silly. Macromedia is a software company; I don't recall
seeing a blood oath in the EULA.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
--
tony
Tony Weeg
tonyweeg [at] gmail [dot] com
On 9/15/05, Andy Mcshane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is good stuff guy's, thanks. If I understand correctly Bluedragon can
be configured on a per site basis so my next question is has anyone had
Bluedragon Coldfusion running on the same server or have I completely got
the wrong end of
This is good stuff guy's, thanks. If I understand correctly
Bluedragon can be configured on a per site basis so my next
question is has anyone had Bluedragon Coldfusion running on
the same server or have I completely got the wrong end of the
stick?
Yes, you can have them installed aat
You should also be able to set up a virtual directory in IIS like /BD/ and
have it point to wwwroot (or where-ever) and set up cfm cfc pages to run off
the BD server (or atleast thats how we're doing it with the free version of
DB not sure if that works with .NET)
Adam H
On 9/15/05, Dave
As far as I know, none of the new features of CFMX 7 (like event gateways,
flsh forms, etc) are available in BD .NET
On 9/14/05, Andy Mcshane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all, I am in the process of setting up a development machine to
evaluate Bluedragon .Net edition. The intention is to
Check out the BD compatibility guide on their site.
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/docs/6_2/BlueDragon_62_CFML_Compatibility_Guide.pdf
Item 3.2: Setting variable names indirectly was the first brick wall I hit
and stopped me dead in my tracks. I would have to rewrite
Hi Matt,
Get ready to take another look.
You'll see a fix for that in the BD 6.2.1 updater, which is
planned for release in mid-November.
Rey...
Matt Robertson wrote:
Check out the BD compatibility guide on their site.
Wow... no offense, but you use this?
CFSET hold=FirstName
CFSET #hold#=bob
CFOUTPUT#FirstName#/CFOUTPUT
Can I ask why? I've never liked that format, preferring setVariable or
variables[..] instead. Is there a reason why you chose to use this?
On 9/14/05, Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
evaluate( )
is... seems like a natural segue.
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 3:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Your experience of Bluedragon.net?
Wow... no offense, but you use this?
CFSET hold=FirstName
CFSET #hold#=bob
I agree... though I'd hate to have to rewrite a whole system that used
that...
Wow... no offense, but you use this?
CFSET hold=FirstName
CFSET #hold#=bob
CFOUTPUT#FirstName#/CFOUTPUT
Can I ask why? I've never liked that format, preferring
setVariable or
variables[..] instead. Is there a
Yeah, I pretty much only do that now. Although I'll sometimes use
setVariable in a custom tag to return data. It 'feels like it is more
obvious to me, when reading the code, that Im returning it.
Either way - I'm waiting on Matt to respond. :) I really want to know
why he did that. (And I hope
14, 2005 4:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Your experience of Bluedragon.net?
Check out the BD compatibility guide on their site.
http://www.newatlanta.com/products/bluedragon/self_help/docs/6_2/BlueDragon_
62_CFML_Compatibility_Guide.pdf
Item 3.2: Setting variable names indirectly was the first
my experience was this:
1. it took a bit of finagling to get it up and running right.
2. when i finally got it up and running i felt like i was in a
different world where errors werent the same, and i didnt know what to
do to fix them
2.5 it really felt like a one's off kinda thing
3. my code
On 9/14/05, Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow... no offense, but you use this?
CFSET hold=FirstName
CFSET #hold#=bob
CFOUTPUT#FirstName#/CFOUTPUT
Sort of. In looking at this I could have been mistaken. The code in question
is
cfset variables.dictLoad_TheFile=admin_boss
Something else I had forgotten but remembered once I checked LiveDocs...
setvariable() is deprecated, so I stayed away from it.
Nowadays I prefer to never dump a var into a just the scope (i.e.
variables.foo). Everything goes into structs if for no other reason than
grouping related stuff
my experience was this:
1. it took a bit of finagling to get it up and running right.
2. when i finally got it up and running i felt like i was in a
different world where errors werent the same, and i didnt know what to
do to fix them
2.5 it really felt like a one's off kinda thing
3. my
19 matches
Mail list logo
