Google can index PDF files can't it? Why not install a Google search on your
site and let it go to town on your directory structure?
-Original Message-
From: Ry Mittlestadt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 11:18 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Advice and direction, please.
I have a feeling you will have trouble solving this problem off the
shelf. Why not modify Ray's application to use client vars and a database?
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 8:58 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Advice
Hi Joel
This would no doubt cause some delay on your mail spool, I do recall that CF
used to have a limit of 40 on the cc/bcc fields but I think this was fixed
in version 5 upwards.
I guess you could test it and see what happens, say to a gmail account.
If you did go down the route of looping
At the moment, I'm on Godaddy shared, so I'm not sure. However, I am going to
be going the dedicated route soon and will be using mx7.
You don't need to delay the emails anymore... What version of CF are you
using?
On 5/11/07, Joel Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jose--
Thanks for the response. Creating a deliberate delay on the cfmail (with the
udf you suggested), I assume, would be to keep the server from getting
overloaded, correct?
As to the heaviness of the email, it would be extremely light, containing
only the text which the user has posted in
I would be doing a loop, and I would also ask what version of CF if its
CFMX6+ then cfmail its ok to use. But god forbid, I wouldn't use more than
one email address for something like this in any one field To:, CC: or even
BCC:
The reason being and its very simple, you could be seen as a mass
You don't need to delay the emails anymore... What version of CF are you
using?
On 5/11/07, Joel Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jose--
Thanks for the response. Creating a deliberate delay on the cfmail (with
the udf you suggested), I assume, would be to keep the server from getting
It depends on their spam rules, some isp's spam filters can see it as a mass
mailout and consider you as a spammer. Its very rare but it can happen...
Same as multiple email address in the fields can also be flagged as being
spam as well.
On 5/11/07, Joel Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew--
That is a very good point; I had not thought of that. Why would an ISP block
an email sent from a loop, if each to: field is unique and the cc: and bcc:
are blank?
Just curious, as I have very little knowledge of those issues.
Thanks!
I would be doing a loop, and I would also ask
Do you see any fail-safe way around this to accomplish what I need to do? Or
is it rare enough that the vast majority of my clients will be unaffected?
Thanks
It depends on their spam rules, some isp's spam filters can see it as a mass
mailout and consider you as a spammer. Its very rare but
No... Simply just do a cfloop around your cfmail and use the spool attribute
and away you go.
I doubt you will have a problem with your isp, but if you do then you can
always ask them to filter your traffic through... But that is extreme case
gone bad, which I doubt will happen.
On 5/12/07,
Neil you regularly spout this tripe. Many of us in the
FarCry community use FarCry for *very* large and complex
installations every day. We often wonder how it is we ever
managed with such a simplistic application framework.
The proof is in the pudding -- when you build enterprise
If I understand correctly, a wildcard setup as you describe
would require a dedicated IP for that particular domain, right?
You could have two A records pointing to the same IP address, although that
will break reverse lookups.
One other thing... when you describe your method of setting
up
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 11:46 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
If I understand correctly, a wildcard setup as you describe
would require a dedicated IP for that particular domain, right?
You could have two A records pointing to the same
.
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Bowers
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sat Dec 02 05:16:57 2006
Subject: Re: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
Munson, Jacob wrote:
Sounds like a good plan to me. The only suggestion I'd make is to look
on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions.
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sat Dec 02 08:01:09 2006
Subject: Re: Advice
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sat Dec 02 02:13:12 2006
Subject: RE: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
Rick, the only thing I'm wondering is, why create a separate database for
each client's site data. That seems to add a layer of complication that
might
I'd be interested in hearing a short list of those features... Let's get
them added - at least as plugins :)
-mark
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 2:01 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Advice needed on how
Rick Faircloth wrote:
and send them all to that for content management. I found that using
subdomains
like this confuses many clients who think that www has to be in there
somewhere,
and they end up trying to go to www.REA.WhiteStoneMedia.com, which, of
course,
doesn't work and leads to
-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 10:16 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
Now, after our little Farcry sidebar (which I have no plans to use, cause I
like to build my own, even while simpler, at least I
Mark A Kruger wrote:
You can pretty easily make www.rea.white Work. I do this routinely.
If I add a subdomain intended for run of the mill users I also add a www.
Entry for it in DNS and the host header as well... Another approach is to
use a wildcard entry with a dedicated IP.
I do
.
So, I could do that... do you think that is the best solution?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 11:53 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
Rick Faircloth wrote:
and send them all
-Talk
Subject: RE: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
You can pretty easily make www.rea.white Work. I do this routinely.
If I add a subdomain intended for run of the mill users I also add a www.
Entry for it in DNS and the host header as well... Another approach is to
use a wildcard
You could also just go with admin.theirdomain.com or
www.theirdomain.com/admin (which is what I do). Or just put an admin
link on the front page =) I have a community web site software that I
built back in 2001 where the authentication setup is the same for all
users, you log into the home
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 12:51 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
You could also just go with admin.theirdomain.com or
www.theirdomain.com/admin (which is what I do). Or just put an admin
link on the front page =) I have a community web
name on the URL
like http:// Stickfordhomes.realtoroffice.net . This way, you do not need to
manage any subdomains.
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 8:16 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Advice needed on how
On 12/2/06, Michael E. Carluen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The next question that comes to mind is how to structure the
domains / subdomains for the CMS's.
Rick, How about using DNS wildcard? Lots of app-as-a-service sites
already
use it. You can register a single generic sounding domain
Casey Dougall wrote:
Be careful of wildcard settings on your sites. Yeah it's cool but Search
Engins do not like it at all. The problem stems from Google, yahoo etc
thinking there are more than one website with the exact same content. This
of course means when someone goes to
Now of course if you use some #CGI.SERVER_NAME# lookups first, then set
the
content of index.cfm to match the domain in question you could be ok.
Right, and I think that's what he's talking about doing.
Casey, Rick R.: Yes, that is what I meant.
Rick F.: domain1.thedomain.com,
-Original Message-
From: Michael E. Carluen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 2:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
The next question that comes to mind is how to structure the
domains / subdomains for the CMS's.
Rick, How
on
the site.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 11:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
Another approach is to use a wildcard entry with a dedicated IP.
Not sure I understand that... do
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 3:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
Maybe I'm misunderstanding the term DNS wildcard... can you explain what
that is in your scenario?
In the scenario you describe, I don't see a DNS wildcard
,
and to use session variables, instead.
Sound good?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Casey Dougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 2:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
Be careful of wildcard settings on your sites. Yeah it's
]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 3:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
Casey Dougall wrote:
Be careful of wildcard settings on your sites. Yeah it's cool but Search
Engins do not like it at all. The problem stems from Google, yahoo etc
thinking
!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Michael E. Carluen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 3:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
~|
Introducing the Fusion
: Saturday, December 02, 2006 4:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
We do exaclty this for a customer with affiliates.
They actually share a single codebase. When a web request comes in we check
out the first part of the domain string which is like
said you do that
without fooling with IIS... ???
Thanks for the advice...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 4:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
Rick,
An entry on the dns
Sounds like a good plan to me. The only suggestion I'd make is to look
at something like Farcry for your CMS parts. Building a feature rich
CMS from the ground up will take a lot of work. I'm lazy at times,
which is why I like to leverage the experience of other projects,
especially open
to
the upgrade for the moment.
Especially with CF 8 due out next year, I can't see spending $1300 now
and another $600 next year to get into CF 8...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 5:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Advice
I had thought about upgrading awhile back, but then the upgrade price
from 4.5 to 7 jumped from about $600 to $1300 and that put a halt to
the upgrade for the moment.
Especially with CF 8 due out next year, I can't see spending $1300 now
and another $600 next year to get into CF 8...
Oh,
Rick, the only thing I'm wondering is, why create a separate database for
each client's site data. That seems to add a layer of complication that
might not be needed. Maybe I'm not quite seeing your vision clearly.
You could have a Clients table to hold that information, including their
Munson, Jacob wrote:
Sounds like a good plan to me. The only suggestion I'd make is to look
at something like Farcry for your CMS parts.
Farcry is an enterprise CMS. Your average real estate agent will *NOT*
be able to use it.
Rick
Message-
From: Rick Root
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Fri Dec 01 23:00:08 2006
Subject: Re: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
Munson, Jacob wrote:
Sounds like a good plan to me. The only suggestion I'd make is to look
at something like Farcry for your CMS parts.
Farcry is an enterprise CMS
Josh Nathanson wrote:
Rick, the only thing I'm wondering is, why create a separate database for
each client's site data. That seems to add a layer of complication that
might not be needed.
Security, Backup/restore, code complexity, site portability.
Multiple commercial clients on
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
It is a good CMS that is for sure, but I certainly wouldn't class it as
Enterprise.
Why not?
It's a lot more powerful than your run of the mill php CMS systems that
are open source, full commercial support is available for it, and it's
got pretty much all the
expressed by Reed Exhibitions.
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Fri Dec 01 23:12:37 2006
Subject: Re: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
It is a good CMS that is for sure, but I
It's a lot more powerful than your run of the mill php CMS
systems that
are open source, full commercial support is available for it,
and it's
got pretty much all the features you'd want an enterprise
class CMS to
have, especially from the level of workflows, approvals, and such.
Munson, Jacob wrote:
Does Enterprise mean it won't work for average users? I mean one of the
main purposes of CMS is to make things easy for non technical users.
I've heard that the latest versions of Farcry are a lot more user
friendly than it use to be.
It would have to be =)
No,
, December 01, 2006 6:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
Munson, Jacob wrote:
Sounds like a good plan to me. The only suggestion I'd make is to look
at something like Farcry for your CMS parts.
Farcry is an enterprise CMS. Your average real estate agent
Some good points, Rick...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 6:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
Josh Nathanson wrote:
Rick, the only thing I'm wondering is, why create a separate
to create the db just once... probably go that route...
Thanks for the feedback, Josh.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Josh Nathanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 5:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Advice needed on how to proceed with app...
Rick, the only thing
Munson, Jacob wrote:
Sounds like a good plan to me. The only suggestion I'd make is to look
at something like Farcry for your CMS parts.
Farcry is an enterprise CMS. Your average real estate agent will *NOT*
be able to use it.
It's fortunate that you can rewrite the UI for every element
Thanks everyone for your input.
- Paul
Hello everyone,
First post here, so don't get too hard on me.
I'm developping a small e-commerce application with less than 1000
products ( around 700).
As far as I know, only product prices would be updated on a weekly
basis.
I'm not too
Paul,
You should never store database information into a memory variable unless it
is within your shopping cart and then I would store it as a array. If you
know for certain that only the prices would be updated weekly, and you know
for certain on which day, I would use cachedwithin with a
Thanks Doug,
Your feedback is greatly appreciated.
Could you tell me why storing a recordset in an application variable is not
recommended. I saw this technique used several times, and prefered over the
cachedWithin method. Apparently it's easier to control, to flush the cache, and
I guess you
.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 4:55 AM
Subject: Re: Advice about query caching
Thanks Doug,
Your feedback is greatly appreciated.
Could you tell me why storing a recordset in an application variable
this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions.
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Doug Brown
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sun Nov 12 13:14:10 2006
Subject: Re: Advice about query caching
Cachedwithin does load the dataset into server memory
cachedwithin?
- Original Message -
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 6:14 AM
Subject: Re: Advice about query caching
It shouldn't have to be calling into the app scope for every request -
only
?
- Original Message -
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 6:14 AM
Subject: Re: Advice about query caching
It shouldn't have to be calling into the app scope for every request -
only
the
intended recipient
Huh? Once it's in the Application scope it can stay there for as long
as you want.
On 11/12/06, Doug Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cachedwithin does load the dataset into server memory but stays there until
it times out, and then refreshes. Setting it in the application scope
requires you to
switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions.
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sun Nov 12 13:50:29 2006
Subject: Re: Advice
://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sun Nov 12 13:50:29 2006
Subject: Re: Advice about query caching
Huh? Once it's in the Application scope it can stay there for as long
as you want.
On 11/12/06, Doug Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sun Nov 12 14:13:51 2006
Subject: Re: Advice about query caching
Oh agreed - it's often better use of resources to query the DB rather
than to perform elaborate caching when each user needs different
results etc. It depends on how big the query is, how much memory is in
the server
I'm going to to quote Ben Forta (et al) here:
ColdFusion is not a database server
If you intend to do frequent, perhaps complex QoQ on the query in
memory, you may be better off simply going to the DB. Multiple calls
to the DB in a page will reuse the same DB connection and for most
purposes CF
://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sun Nov 12 14:13:51 2006
Subject: Re: Advice about query caching
Oh agreed - it's often better use of resources to query the DB rather
than to perform elaborate caching when each user needs different
results etc
Could you tell me why storing a recordset in an application
variable is not recommended. I saw this technique used
several times, and prefered over the cachedWithin method.
Apparently it's easier to control, to flush the cache, and I
guess you could use Cfqueryparam as well.
There is
You should never store database information into a memory
variable unless it is within your shopping cart and then I
would store it as a array.
I'm sorry, but this is simply wrong.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber
I'm not too sure how to handle caching.
So here is my question. Is it appropriate to store the
products recordset in an application variable within
onApplicationStart, and use QoQ for for data manipulation
in my different templates ?
Any query that has significant reuse potential as-is,
Paul,
I think your method would certainly work, however my experience with
e-commerce has been that the full recordset of products is almost
never used. By using QoQ against your full recordset, you do limit
yourself in some of the functions like true full-text searching that
the
You can get browser plugins (esp. for Firefox) that help with JavaScript
debugging. I think the favourite one is FireBug.
For CF debugging, there are a couple of tools that you can pay for (FusionDebug
and FusionReactor), but I've no idea how good they might be.
Personally, for CF I mainly
I'd also suggest using Firefox for javascript debugging. It's far more
robust than IE's error messages (which are basically useless).
As for debugging in Coldfusion, the cfdump tag is your friend!
cfdump var=#FORM
cfdump var=#queryName
cfdump var=#myVariable
cfdump var=#someStructure
Each of
Hi Richard,
For ColdFusion MX debugging, I would highly recommend FusionDebug from
Intergral.
A link with a coupon code can be found on my site:
http://www.centrasoft.com/fusiondebug.cfm
For Javascript debugging, I would recommend FireBug for FireFox:
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/1843/
hi brian,
thanks for the reply. I will def check out the 2 products seeing as you
recommend them very highly ;)
Is it flash you have used to do alot of your site? If yes, then i have noticed
you must have highly optimised the flash so that it isnt slow. I would love to
learn how to optimise
thanks for the advice, it has been very helpful as i turned on the enable
debugging in the coldfusion thinking that would help me, but noticed very
quickly that it provided data that confused me and can only be used for certain
things. I will check out the links and use cfdump and cfabort for
Isaac,
I left Las Vegas about two years ago because there isn't much of a market
for CF developers. Be warned that when your contract runs out, you may not
be able to find another job.
My advice to you would be to take things slow.
If you are considering relocation, there are plenty of jobs for
I would suggest that you look at the code that drives the MachII
framework.It might give you some ideas on how CFCs can be used and
what they are capable of doing.On that note (beware: shameless plug),
you could also check out cfcUnit at SourceForge
(http://sourceforge.com/projects/openxcf).It
I wouldn't get too hung up on 'performance'...
Sadly, I'd actually get more hung up on the coding, until I have more practice at it, but was thinking next app anyway. I was just going by the times shown in the comparison of fb3/fb4/machii/ontap floating around. And that some fb3 apps I've tried
I figured if I could code something nice and clean somewhat along the lines of the petmarket it would be faster loading.
Is that not the case?
Yes, you can nearly always write something that's architected completely towards your specific app that runs a smidgeon faster than something like FB or
Not to mention most custom made solutions for small shortterm projects
are not fast, because they aren't finetuned, evolved in any way, or the
developers did not have the time to write a decent TO for the project.
On such occasions you'd better take a machii framework, and use code
which has all
Thanks for the advice. I was looking at this chart:
Avg. TTFB (ms)
Framework20 threads150 threads
MachII139312473
OnTap293912243
Fusebox 312709423
Fusebox 411448863
Does that chart not mean that under medium load MachII is 1/4 sec slower than FB4, and, under heavy load, MachII is about 4 seconds
My CFC knowledge is limited at the moment, but if you want some good starting points to building an app with CFC's then downloand and check out Ray Camdens BlogCFC (http://www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus/blog/).
If you're looking for a good way to structure your code then have you looked at
I haven't seen the petmarket example, so I can't comment on that
particular case, but I can say that - Yes, in general, that's a very
bad thing. I'm not going to go into detail about WHY it's a bad thing,
because I'll be rabbiting on for hours, but in practical it harms the
flexibility,
I'm not interested in Fusebox, and MachII is a bit much to begin with, maybe later. I am worried, however, about the speed of MachII. I thought FB3 apps ran slowly, and MachII is apparently slower, no?
I do have Ray's BlogCFC and need to look at it more, but, to be honest, at first glance I find
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:37:04 -0400, stylo stylo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not interested in Fusebox, and MachII is a bit much to begin with, maybe later. I am worried, however, about the speed of MachII. I thought FB3 apps ran slowly, and MachII is apparently slower, no?
Macromedia has about
, 2004 11:54 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: advice on structure and cfcs (petmarket related)
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:37:04 -0400, stylo stylo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not interested in Fusebox, and MachII is a bit much to
begin with, maybe later. I am worried, however, about the
speed of MachII
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:01:03 -0700, Spike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's worth noting that for development purposes MachII can be
brutally slow if you've got debugging turned on.
Only if you have CF reporting execution times. If you turn execution
times off, debugging isn't too bad.
--
-Talk
Subject: Re: advice on structure and cfcs (petmarket related)
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:01:03 -0700, Spike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's worth noting that for development purposes MachII can be
brutally slow if you've got debugging turned on.
Only if you have CF reporting execution
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 13:45:11 -0700, Spike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not been my experience.
...
With execution times turned on, the page execution time took about 30%
longer, but the debugging information took up to a minute to render.
IMO 10-12 seconds is too slow.
I agree. I was
Ian,
You need to have a field (a foreign key) in your second table that
corresponds to the info in your first table.
So, your courseoutline table looks like so:
ID (primary key)
Title
Summary
Owner
Coursepath
Then, your iteccource looks like so:
ID (primary key)
courseoutlineID (foreign key to
a form select list otherwise
the admin user would not know what course they are adding ???
From: Deanna Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 July 2004 12:45
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Advice for CF Query and Schema
Ian,
You need to have a field (a foreign
Subject: RE: Advice for CF Query and Schema
Deanna
Ok thanks, when adding a new course to the iteccourse database, how
would I get the correct value to place into the courseoutlineID (foreign
key to courseoutline) field
Because when adding a new course to the iteccourse database, the user
I am using CFCONTENT to retrieve photos stored off of the root
directory. I didn't think the site would grow so fast, and I have
been allowing users to upload all of the images to one folder. I am
now at about 6000 images and am woried about performance issues both
with CFCONTENT and
I would recommend that you reorganize your files using some easily
understood directory scheme. For example, you might create year and month
directories.
Yep, subsequent projects used a directory scheme based on filenames
(which themselves have a naming system). We decided on 100 files per
Nick Han said:
I am more interested in database design help.What I am thinking
right now is right after the deadline, before the reviewer making
changes, I dup the db schema and back that up, and the current
schema will have the current data, including changes made by the
reviewer. If there
Jochem,
I am not sure this will work, since there are about 30 tables in the schema and each table has various relationships with one another.During the review process, the reviewer can quit anytime and maybe come back later to resume on it.Having said that, there are several starting points in
,
barneyb
-Original Message-
From: Nick Han [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 9:58 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: advice needed on multi-version data model design
Jochem,
I am not sure this will work, since there are about 30
tables in the schema and each table has
page in the app.
Cheers,
barneyb
-Original Message-
From: Nick Han [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 9:58 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: advice needed on multi-version data model design
Jochem,
I am not sure this will work, since there are about 30
tables
Nick Han said:
Barney, thanks for your advice.I understand your suggested
solution for the simple example I wrote here.But my main concern
in practice is that any field in any table could change.So for an
application where all information submitted by the original submiter
is complete, the
, then you'd handle it just
like the financials.It would just be another table that is bound through
the central application table.
Cheers,
barneyb
-Original Message-
From: Nick Han [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 11:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: advice needed
What exactly do you want to accomplish with this project?Use environment, intranet? internet? who are the users? user roles? and how do multi-version come into play in this scenario?And it would also be good to know what dbms you intend or are using now.
Jochem,
I am not sure this will work,
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
