On Tuesday, Mar 25, 2003, at 05:35 US/Pacific, Calvin Ward wrote:
This is great stuff! Which application example provides us a view of
utilizing CFCs in this manner?
Is this what you're looking for? (I couldn't reply to your post until
this article was published! :)
, 2003 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: Request for Review: Variables in CFML
On Tuesday, Mar 25, 2003, at 05:35 US/Pacific, Calvin Ward wrote:
This is great stuff! Which application example provides us a view of
utilizing CFCs in this manner?
Is this what you're looking for? (I couldn't reply to your
On Saturday, Mar 29, 2003, at 16:18 US/Pacific, Marius Milosav wrote:
Any news on the cfcs (cffunctions) and transaction limitation?
It's in the bugbase, it's being looked at, but of course I can't give
any indication of when it might get fixed. Sorry.
In the mean time I would like to know
On Monday, Mar 24, 2003, at 22:04 US/Pacific, Jim Davis wrote:
So lemme check for understanding here:
Unless we specifially set up buddies sessions act just like they always
did. (Server dies, session dies)
Correct.
When you DO set up buddies ALL session traffic (updates, creates, etc)
Jim Davis wrote:
Personally I use the Application scope for session data and roll my own
timeout simply to gain the ability for end of session event
processing.
If you use J2EE sessions you can create a listener in Java that listens
for end of session events and acts on them. Although I am
Sean,
This is great stuff! Which application example provides us a view of
utilizing CFCs in this manner?
Calvin
- Original Message -
From: Sean A Corfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 11:40 PM
Subject: Re: Request for Review: Variables
Message -
CW From: Sean A Corfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CW To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CW Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 11:40 PM
CW Subject: Re: Request for Review: Variables in CFML
On Monday, Mar 24, 2003, at 09:30 US/Pacific, Bryan Stevenson wrote:
Could someone explain the benefit
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Request for Review: Variables in CFML
Jim Davis wrote:
Personally I use the Application scope for session data and roll my
own timeout simply
Thanks to Sean and Dave and others for lending a hand. I've updated the
guide with corrections and suggestions:
http://www.depressedpress.com/DepressedPress/Content/ColdFusion/Guides/V
ariables/Index.cfm
If you've got a minute I'd still some some more opinions.
Thanks in advance,
Jim Davis
stopped 47,815 spam messages. You can too!
Get your free, safe spam protection at
http://www.cloudmark.com/spamnetsig/
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 12:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Request for Review: Variables in CFML
Thanks
Monday, March 24, 2003, 11:46:36 AM, you wrote:
SAC Client variables are restricted to simple data types, session variables
SAC can be anything (including CFCs). That alone may be sufficient reason
SAC to prefer session variables to client variables. Also, with client
SAC variables, you are
Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message -
From: Sean A Corfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:46 AM
Subject: Re: Request for Review: Variables in CFML
On Monday, Mar 24, 2003, at 02:57 US/Pacific, Matt Robertson wrote:
Isn't
Sean wrote:
I'd be interested to hear from folks - like Matt - who use them and
prefer them to session variables.
You can pretty much take Jon Hall's post and add 'me too' to that. I
had horrifying experiences with disappearing session vars, mostly
related to code running on shared servers
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 11:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Request for Review: Variables in CFML
On Monday, Mar 24, 2003, at 02:57 US/Pacific, Matt Robertson wrote:
Isn't it possible for CFMX to scale session vars across a
cluster now?
Yes, since you can use J2EE
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 11:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Request for Review: Variables in CFML
On Monday, Mar 24, 2003, at 02:57 US/Pacific, Matt Robertson wrote:
Isn't it possible for CFMX to scale
On Monday, Mar 24, 2003, at 18:58 US/Pacific, Jim Davis wrote:
Yes, since you can use J2EE session variables and leverage the
scalability of the underlying J2EE system.
So how does this actually work across a cluster?
See my blog:
http://www.corfield.org/blog/archives/2003_01.html#55
and
On Monday, Mar 24, 2003, at 11:18 US/Pacific, Matt Robertson wrote:
[snip experience with session vars]
Hmm, sounds like you (and others) have been burned by pre-MX CF in this
area... I didn't realize it was that bad...
Question: CFMX uses J2EE's session variables. I'm not up on this at
all,
On Monday, Mar 24, 2003, at 09:30 US/Pacific, Bryan Stevenson wrote:
Could someone explain the benefit of holding CFCs in a session var?
Say in
the case of security or identifying details about a logged in user.
Instead of having, say, half a dozen separate session variables holding
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 11:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Request for Review: Variables in CFML
On Monday, Mar 24, 2003, at 18:58 US/Pacific, Jim Davis wrote:
Yes, since you can use J2EE session variables
On Saturday, Mar 22, 2003, at 22:51 US/Pacific, Jim Davis wrote:
I'm looking specifically for mistakes I may have made or language
that's
confusing or otherwise craptastic.
A typo on this page:
http://www.depressedpress.com/DepressedPress/Content/ColdFusion/Guides/
I'm attempting to finish up a project started some time ago and would
love some feedback before I make it public. It's an attempt at a
comprehensive guide to using variables in CFML (well, as near as I can
get to comprehensive... It's a big topic).
Here's a link to the currnet draft:
21 matches
Mail list logo
