Hello all,
I have a select menu that I need to be dynamically populated with the
results of a db query. I am using jQuery/ajax to pass a value to search for in
the database. This all seems to work fine except what is returned is a WDDX
packet and I cannot figure out how to take the data
WDDX can't be turned into variables with eval() - that's JSON you're
thinking of.
Why are using WDDX? Can you either use the JSON returntype from a CFC
or, if you are on an old version of CF, build a JSON return?
--
WSS4CF - WS-Security framework for CF
http://wss4cf.riaforge.org/
On 20
I am using jQuery/ajax to pass a value to search for in the database.
This all seems to work fine except what is returned is a WDDX packet
Do you have control of code that currently returns WDDX packet? If so, why
not edit it to use cfwddx action = wddx2js SEE
http://livedocs.adobe.com
It's been a long time since I've done this so this may not be useful, but isn't
the returned packet a Javascript array? At least it was when I used to use
cfwddx, so it was just a matter of normal array manipulation.
~|
It's been a long time since I've done this so this may not be useful,
but isn't the returned packet a Javascript array? At least it was
when I used to use cfwddx, so it was just a matter of normal array
manipulation.
Thanks for the response! You would think so, but from my experience I
No, WDDX is XML, not Javascript; it always has been.
--
WSS4CF - WS-Security framework for CF
http://wss4cf.riaforge.org/
On 20 July 2010 21:13, Shannon Rhodes shan...@rhodesedge.com wrote:
It's been a long time since I've done this so this may not be useful, but
isn't the returned packet
Right...and cfwddx action = wddx2js should convert that WDDX to a
WddxRecordset javascript object. SEE
http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/8/htmldocs/help.html?content=Tags_u-z_2.html#2682044
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 8:40 AM, James Holmes james.hol...@gmail.comwrote:
No, WDDX is XML
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: CF Query to WDDX to Javascript. Possible?
It's been a long time since I've done this so this may not be useful,
but isn't the returned packet a Javascript array? At least it was
when I used to use cfwddx, so it was just a matter of normal array
manipulation.
Thanks
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:40 AM, James Holmes james.hol...@gmail.com wrote:
No, WDDX is XML, not Javascript; it always has been.
The WDDX SDK actually shipped with a fairly robust (for the time) set
of JS libraries for manipulating WDDX data via JavaScript.
Looks like the official home(s
sure there is a better way to go than I am currently
going, and if JSON is it I am open to it.
No, WDDX is XML, not Javascript; it always has been.
The WDDX SDK actually shipped with a fairly robust (for the time) set
of JS libraries for manipulating WDDX data via JavaScript.
Looks like
Sorry, meant as per John's suggestion cfwddx action = wddx2js, not the packet
itself.
No, WDDX is XML, not Javascript; it always has been.
--
WSS4CF - WS-Security framework for CF
http://wss4cf.riaforge.org/
On 20 July 2010 21:13, Shannon Rhodes shan...@rhodesedge.com wrote:
It's
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Will Blake willbl...@printelect.com wrote:
OK, first not sure why there are two threads going about this question...
Probably something about the HOF email/BB interface splitting it up.
I currently on CF 6.1 so I (should?) be able to get a JSON response, I
Cameron,
Agreed. We do have CF 9 we just have not installed it yet. I am not 100%
sure what is taking so long to get it done, but that is a decision that much
higher up in the food chain than I am.
I'll check out CFLib.org and see what I can find. Thanks for the info.
Will
OK,
Hi all,
I am using CFwddx tag to create wddx packets and send them to a third party.
This third party would do its thing and then send me back a wddx packet. In
the wddx packet, the row count needs to be specified. In the case where the
row count does not match the actual count
No, as long as the wddx packet is still valid XML, it will
serialize/deserialize fine
Brook
-Original Message-
From: Monte Chan [mailto:monte_c...@sanctuarysoftwareonline.com]
Sent: May-06-10 9:10 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Question about wddx
Hi all,
I am using CFwddx tag
Good Day,
Just checking to see if anyone else has experienced any issues with converting
WDDX in CF9.
I have the following that converts a Query object to WDDX and then I insert it
into the DB:
Cfwddx action=cfml2wddx input=#arguments.myQuery# output=local.wddxQuery
usetimezoneinfo=true
Is it CF8? ReturnType was added in CF8.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Rick Fairclothr...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Before I get into code, I thought I'd just ask if there is a usual reason
why a jquery ajax function
(which I have used successfully on other sites) would be returning this
Doh! I'm an idiot!
I typed
components/siteManagerData.cfc?method=mGetManagerPermissionsreturntype=json,
Notice the end...returntype where it should be returnformat=json...
jQuery uses datatype: json... I just transferred the type part to the
CF.
I caught this earlier but, gmail doesn't
Dang, so obvious once you see it. ;)
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Rick Fairclothr...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Doh! I'm an idiot!
I typed
components/siteManagerData.cfc?method=mGetManagerPermissionsreturntype=json,
Notice the end...returntype where it should be returnformat=json...
Before I get into code, I thought I'd just ask if there is a usual reason
why a jquery ajax function
(which I have used successfully on other sites) would be returning this
mesage in Firebug:
wddxPacket version='1.0'header/datastructvar
name='LOGIN'stringLogin Successful/string
There is a wddx.js and wddxDes.js library through openwddx.org.
These will help you serialize/deserialize wddx to Javascript objects. You can
try to then make follow on calls to turn these to JSON notation.
~|
Adobe
Peter,
It might be best to explain what your app is trying to do and why you
need to convert from WDDX to JSON.
Rey...
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Boughton
Sent: 10 June 2008 11:40
To: Coldfusion Development; cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Subject: [CF-Dev] WDDX-JSON plugin for jQuery ?
- see footer for list info -
Hi all,
Does anyone have a plugin for jQuery
Peter,
Have you considered skipping WDDX and going straight to JSON? If not,
check out both AJAXCFC and JSON.CFC.
Carl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A bit more background info. might be good but have you looking at AJAXCFC?
The Robert Gordon University, a Scottish charity registered under
Hello,
I have a coldfusion application which I have structured using Fusebox. I have
a template that does several queries and builds up a complex structure (many
fields and an array of substructures). I'm trying to serialize this structure
(using wddx) and pass it to another template which
Not sure if it is the cause of the error, but I would recommend agains doing
this. All browsers have a limitation on the length of the URL that they will
pass, which range from about 2000 up to 100,000. A WDDX string could easily
pass this length limit. I'd look at storing it in a cookie (though
First, I'd strongly recommend NOT passing WDDX on the URL. There is a
limit on the size of a URL, though in most cases it's high enough to
ignore. With a WDDX packet (which are not known for being small) it'd
be quite simple to eclipse that limit and end up with only a partial
packet
Hello,
I have a coldfusion application which I have structured using Fusebox. I have
a template that does several queries and builds up a complex structure (many
fields and an array of substructures). I'm trying to serialize this structure
(using wddx) and pass it to another template which
This should do it...
a
href=./index.cfm?fuseaction=AddContactinputStruct=#urlSafePacket#Click
Here/a
Having said that, I totally 100% agree with Brian, passing the WDDX packet
on the URL is the last thing you should be doing. It's prone to failure and
a very fragile method of transferring data
On Friday 30 Mar 2007, Rick Root wrote:
I'm currently working on a flex application where the user can set a
variety of preferences. For example, a list of items to be automatically
selected in a certain list control.
OOI, why not use SharedObject() ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to enormously
Thanks Jim, this is very helpful.
Dan
On 3/23/07, Jim Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Dan O'Keefe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 7:54 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: WDDX v.s. CF 7 XML functionality
While having a few legacy apps
I still use WDDX in old and new applications. Not often, but I find it
valuable for storing data in the database that I don't need to be
searchable.
I'm currently working on a flex application where the user can set a variety
of preferences. For example, a list of items to be automatically
While having a few legacy apps myself making use of WDDX, I was wondering if
WDDX still has value that is not currently offered in the XML support of CF
7.02. Seems like opedwddx.org is pretty stale.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Dan
--
Dan O'Keefe
In my opinion value of WDDX today is ability to quickly convert complex data
types to predefined XML format. There are times when you just need query as
XML without paying too much attention how it's actually structured.
Tero
-Original Message-
From: Dan O'Keefe [mailto:[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Dan O'Keefe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 7:54 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: WDDX v.s. CF 7 XML functionality
While having a few legacy apps myself making use of WDDX, I was
wondering if
WDDX still has value that is not currently
Good Morning All! Having issues parsing a WDDX recordset pulled from an Oracle
database. The recordset was created within JavaScript using the WDDX.js, and
then passed to a CF page that inserts it into an Oracle Database. We ran into
a size issue inserting the record, even though it appears
Good Morning All! Having issues parsing a WDDX recordset
pulled from an Oracle database. The recordset was created
within JavaScript using the WDDX.js, and then passed to a CF
page that inserts it into an Oracle Database. We ran into a
size issue inserting the record, even though
can make the config files UTF-8 now.
Today I made the switch; I wrote a couple of functions to read in the ini
files, converting each of them into a structure and then serializing the
structure into a WDDX packet, saving it out as an XML file. I altered my
ReadProfileSection function to determine
I am in the processing of writing a CF application in CF5.
The client I am working with will be sending me an XML packet via an HTTP
POST.
So I assume it's a SOAP packet.
Is it possible to use WDDX to grab that packet and manipulate it as needed?
Is it possible to parse that packet
Well, first WDDX is not in itself a tool, it's standardized XML format. So
for you to use WDDX to grab the file, it would need to be a valid WDDX type
xml file.
When the customer posts the XML file to you Cold Fusion page you will need
to parse out the XML file and as I recall, doing that in CF5
Thanks for the input Alan.
However this is an app for the client, and CF5 is what we are stuck with.
Eventually, we will upgrade to MX7, we all agree, but until then we have to
use what we got to pay the bills and keep everyone's mouths fed.
:-)
If you have any say in the matter I would try
The client I am working with will be sending me an XML packet
via an HTTP POST.
So I assume it's a SOAP packet.
I wouldn't make that assumption. It could be any sort of XML at all, unless
you've specifically agreed to use SOAP.
Is it possible to use WDDX to grab that packet and manipulate
Thanks for the tips Dave,
I'll check those out before continuing on.
You should first confirm exactly what XML you're receiving.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training centers in
I havent used it for a long time, but do people think the WDDX
Javascript libraries are a good way to handle AJAX type functions?
Have people been using this already?
--
Mark Drew
http://www.markdrew.co.uk/blog/
~|
Logware
-Original Message-
From: Mark Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 12:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Thinking Aloud: WDDX AJAX
I havent used it for a long time, but do people think the WDDX
Javascript libraries are a good way to handle AJAX type functions
You can't pass an empty date, but you can pass a null. From
http://livedocs.macromedia.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/xml45.htm
Null values in WDDX are not associated with a type such as number or
string. The cfwddx tag converts WDDX Nulls to empty strings.
On 11/4/05, Chris Velevitch [EMAIL
How do you pass null dates via wddx?
When I try passing:-
var name='resetdate'
datetime/datetime
/var
as part of my wddx data, cfwddx action='wddx2cfml' generates an
invalid WDDX packet error.
This data will be inserted in a database where this column will access nulls.
Any
on to another web app which is outside of my
control. Assume CFMX7 on the local site and some unknown WDDX capable
setup on the remote site.
Using WDDX to transfer the data between the sites I've got it working
right now but the part I am stuck on is authentication.
How do I ensure that only
of the WDDX.js file, so I'm surprised they never updated
the WDDX core files.
They really ought to at least get the latest version of the file posted to
OpenWDDX.org.
In AJAX-style applications it's often simpler to just pass XML back and
forth (to pass raw JS you need to have a container to run that script
WDDX SDK released and noticed it doesn't contain
the most current wddx.js file.
Looking at the code in the SDK, I see they are indeed still using string
concatenation the wddxSerializer_write function.
They really ought to at least put the latest wddx.js file in the SDK. I
wonder if anyone
-Original Message-
From: Dan G. Switzer, II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 12:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: [SOT] Better WDDX JavaScript serializer/deserializer
functions?
Jim,
But the library was browser compatible for Netscape 3
it - the DOM hadn't yet been published. Remember that the JS WDDX library
included in the official SDK was written in what... 1998? 1999?
Not that it really matters, but IE4 had XML support via an ActiveX
object--and that was circa 1998 (or at least very early 1998.) IE5 was
released in 1999 as well--I
-Original Message-
From: Dan G. Switzer, II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 9:40 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: [SOT] Better WDDX JavaScript serializer/deserializer
functions?
Jim,
The reason the wddx.js stuff is so slow is because it's parsing the XML
a speed increase by creating a new WDDX
library that uses the XML object to natively parse the XML document and then
convert that into data.
It would be interesting to see what the speed difference would be. I would
think it would be substantial, but still might be klunky over really large
XML chunks
-Original Message-
From: Dan G. Switzer, II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 12:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: [SOT] Better WDDX JavaScript serializer/deserializer
functions?
The reason the wddx.js stuff is so slow is because it's parsing the XML
On 10/3/05, Jim Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got one... I'm not sure if it's better tho'.
Right now it's sort of embedded in a larger library (the full library does
WDDX, JSON, XML-RPC and YODEL) - I could split it out for you if you like.
It may be faster, it may
-Original Message-
From: wolf2k5 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2005 3:57 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: [SOT] Better WDDX JavaScript serializer/deserializer
functions?
On 10/3/05, Jim Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got one... I'm not sure if it's better
Hi all,
I am developing a web application with ColdFusion MX 6.1.
I added some AJAX features using WDDX as format for exchanging data
between the browser and the server, since it's supported natively by
ColdFusion (e.g. CFCs with remote access).
However the WDDX JavaScript serializer
-Original Message-
From: wolf2k5 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 3:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: [SOT] Better WDDX JavaScript serializer/deserializer functions?
Hi all,
I am developing a web application with ColdFusion MX 6.1.
I added some AJAX features
-Original Message-
From: Roger B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 12:56 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
If you have some time I'd much appreciate you going over my XMLRPC
implementation to see if it measures up
I'm making the assumption (probably a good one) that the problem
is on my end...
Jim: It's not a problem... just confusion brought on by a lack of
explanation. That outer array is the array of params... you can
safely ignore it.
To make things clearer, I added a second CFDUMP that displays
-Original Message-
From: Roger B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 10:50 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
I'm making the assumption (probably a good one) that the problem
is on my end...
Jim: It's
Mostly because I'd never heard of it until you mentioned it. Where have you
been for the past two weeks while I've been ranting about not having
something like this. ;^)
Jim: I only skim the list, in general. I'm surprised I didn't notice
the conversation, though... I have watchlists set up
But
although the system does seem to be well supported it also seems to be
poorly documented. ;^)
Jim: That's a matter of perspective. Some people love Dave Winer's
approach to spec-writing, and some people absolutely *loathe* it. I'm
gonna guess you're in the latter group. :D
-
-Original Message-
From: Roger B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 12:56 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
But
although the system does seem to be well supported it also seems to be
poorly documented
I think I've hit upon an appropriate name... get ready... here
it comes...
YODEL
It stand for Yet another Open Data Exchange Language. Also
Yodeling began
as a method for passing messaged from mountain peak to
mountain peak using
only simple modulations of voice... all told it seems
discussing
his idea of embedding raw data in RSS feeds a couple years ago... not
only is it more lightweight than WDDX or SOAP, there's virtually no
language or environment that doesn't already support it. That kind of
ubiquity is hard to ignore.
--
Roger Benningfield
JournURL
http
-Original Message-
From: Roger B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 10:04 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
Jim: Any reason not to go with the prior art and just use (or extend,
if necessary) XML-RPC?
Mostly because
-Original Message-
From: Roger B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 10:04 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
Jim: Any reason not to go with the prior art and just use (or extend,
if necessary) XML-RPC?
XML-RPC
A slightly new version:
http://www.depressedpress.com/DepressedPress/Test/
This one fixed several string parsing errors - one of which I feel is
interesting enough to talk about:
Apparently IE 6 has a problem with \v (the escape character for Vertical
Tab.
I'm creating a hash table of
ditto and very original.
I think I've hit upon an appropriate name... get ready... here
Jim, that's a *brilliant* name for such a technology. Seriously.
/t
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time
tools. WDDX, for
example, can't be described using an XSD... which may be stupid on the W3C's
part but is true nonetheless. But XML/XSD provides a basic level of
validation that would have to be built from scratch otherwise.
+) Something that's appropriate for both download AND upload traffic
Well - it looks like dataML is already taken for something else anyway...
anybody got a good idea for a new name?
I'm thinking either simple as in dpml (Depressed Press Markup Language)
which says absolutely NOTHING about what it does or esoteric like Rosetta.
Whatcha think?
I know this is
at this point...
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 2:09 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
[Sorry - I posted this in CFCommunity already but all the action seems to be
over here...]
I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Why not dpxl, seeing as it's not a markup language so much as a data
transfer language that happens to an XML application?
Jim Davis wrote:
+) Something that's easy to parse for JavaScript. SOAP is NOT easy to
parse (which is, I think, why there's
At 02:33 AM 8/18/2005, you wrote:
Well - it looks like dataML is already taken for something else anyway...
anybody got a good idea for a new name?
I'm thinking either simple as in dpml (Depressed Press Markup Language)
which says absolutely NOTHING about what it does or esoteric like Rosetta.
Well - it looks like dataML is already taken for
something else anyway...
anybody got a good idea for a new name?
I'm thinking either simple as in dpml (Depressed Press
Markup Language)
which says absolutely NOTHING about what it does or
esoteric like Rosetta.
Whatcha think?
I know
XIEF (XML Information Exchange Format)
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 10:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
Well - it looks like dataML is already taken for something else
-Original Message-
From: Keith Gaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 7:57 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Why not dpxl, seeing as it's not a markup language so
-Original Message-
From: Calvin Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 7:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
Interesting ideas and it seems like a good direction.
The use of the word object seems to trip me up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Davis wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Keith Gaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not quite true. The data typing in JSON is implicit. Of the types listed
below it can unambiguously represent object, array, null, string,
string, boolean, and
-Original Message-
From: Keith Gaughan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 12:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt (was RE: Ajax and CFCs)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Davis wrote:
-Original Message-
From
Here are the names we've come up with so far (with my personal comments):
DPXL: (Depressed Press Transfer Language) - the professional side of me is
leaning here. It puts my company right in the name! But how smart is it to
put a trademark in the name of something you're open-sourcing?
DEML:
MILF
Multiple Information Language Format
yeah, means nothing and has little to nothing to do with your WDDX
replacement...but would get recognition because of the acronym, I
reckon :)
DataSphincter's gonna be hard to beat tho.
On 8/18/05, Jim Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are the names
2:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: WDDX Replacement Attempt - Name?
Here are the names we've come up with so far (with my personal comments):
DPXL: (Depressed Press Transfer Language) - the professional side of me is
leaning here. It puts my company right in the name! But how smart is it to
put
At 04:21 PM 8/18/2005, you wrote:
My personal favorite...
XXL - XML Xchange Language
Or for really big packets, XXXL - XML Xfer and Xchange Language.
--
Phillip Beazley
Onvix -- Website Hosting, Development E-commerce
Visit http://www.onvix.com/ or call 727-578-9600.
I like Adamic... but not because it invloves my name.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adamic_language
Although, I'm not crazy about the religous background.
-Adam
On 8/18/05, Jim Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are the names we've come up with so far (with my personal comments):
DPXL:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Davis wrote:
DPXL: (Depressed Press Transfer Language) - the professional side of me is
leaning here. It puts my company right in the name! But how smart is it to
put a trademark in the name of something you're open-sourcing?
Well, seeing
At 04:21 PM 8/18/2005, you wrote:
My personal favorite...
XXL - XML Xchange Language
Or for really big packets, XXXL - XML Xfer and Xchange
Language.
And pohibited in many states of course... :)
s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without
I'm really leaning towards a non-abbreviated word...
something that means
move or transfer but maybe even with a sense of irony
or humor.
Wormhole perhaps?DataSphincter?
Courier ... or possibly X-Courier...
DataWinch
DataSieve
Windlass
Puny X-Press
PieHole :)
s. isaac dealey
S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
My personal favorite...
XXL - XML Xchange Language
why not just fred or barney?
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and documenting hours
At 05:00 PM 8/18/2005, you wrote:
Courier ... or possibly X-Courier...
DataWinch
DataSieve
Windlass
Puny X-Press
PieHole :)
LOL!
DataBitch
PacketWagon
XMule
XHNA (XHNA Has No Acronym)
--
Phillip Beazley
Onvix -- Website Hosting, Development E-commerce
Visit http://www.onvix.com/ or
S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
My personal favorite...
XXL - XML Xchange Language
why not just fred or barney?
I like Bob for anything that can't be named... or possibly Edgar.
s. isaac dealey 954.522.6080
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open
General Open Architecture Transport Specific Engine
On 8/18/05, S. Isaac Dealey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
My personal favorite...
XXL - XML Xchange Language
why not just fred or barney?
I like Bob for anything that can't be named... or possibly Edgar.
s.
Because barney is already taken. ;)
On 8/18/05, Paul Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
My personal favorite...
XXL - XML Xchange Language
why not just fred or barney?
--
Barney Boisvert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.319.6145
http://www.barneyb.com/
Got Gmail? I have 50
Then I vote for
PDXF (Purple Dinosaur eXchange Format)...
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 5:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt - Name?
Because barney is already taken. ;)
On 8/18/05, Paul
Calvin Ward wrote:
Then I vote for
PDXF (Purple Dinosaur eXchange Format)...
i was actually thinking about the flintstones.
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt - Name?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Davis wrote:
DPXL: (Depressed Press Transfer Language) - the professional side of
me is leaning here. It puts my company right in the name! But how
smart is it to put a trademark in the name
Ruthless. You sir have hit a new low. LOL.
Rey...
Charlie Griefer wrote:
General Open Architecture Transport Specific Engine
On 8/18/05, S. Isaac Dealey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
My personal favorite...
XXL - XML Xchange Language
why not just fred or barney?
I
-Original Message-
From: Adrocknaphobia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 4:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: WDDX Replacement Attempt - Name?
I like Adamic... but not because it invloves my name.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adamic_language
Although, I'm
1 - 100 of 852 matches
Mail list logo
